monitoraeo
AEO Rankings · SaaS

AEO for warehouse robotics software: AI search visibility ranking

How AI search engines rank warehouse robotics software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Robotics and orchestration platforms used to automate picking, movement, storage, and fulfillment inside warehouses and distribution centers. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

2%
Avg visibility across category
8%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

When buyers inquire about Warehouse robotics software, AI engines consistently highlight inVia Robotics as the leader. With a citation rate of 62.5%, inVia Robotics stands out significantly. Other prominent brands in this space include Locus Robotics and Symbotic, which also frequently appear in AI-generated recommendations.

The rankings are largely based on robust sources that AI engines pull data from, such as youtube.com and g2.com. These aggregator and review sites play a central role, indicating an emphasis on user experience and peer reviews. This aggregation means that rankings align closely with platforms where user opinions and expert analyses intersect.

For buyers using this page to evaluate Warehouse robotics software, it is essential to consider the weight AI engines place on recent reviews and third-party validation. Assessing how each brand is perceived on major review sites can offer valuable insights into its reliability and performance in specific subcategories.

At a glance

Category leader Locus Robotics 12% visibility · named in 1 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand inVia Robotics 62% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in warehouse robotics software
Top cited domain youtube.com Referenced by AI across the warehouse robotics software query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 12pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 17 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this category

inVia Robotics holds the top composite score at 18.8, with a citation rate of 62.5 percent despite a visibility score of 0.0 percent. Locus Robotics sits second at a composite of 16.2, with 12.5 percent visibility and 25.0 percent citation. The gap between first and second is 2.6 composite points, which is relatively narrow, but inVia's citation dominance over every other brand in the category is striking and suggests the AI is pulling its domain content into answers without surfacing it in direct brand mentions.

Several brands show a divergence between being named in AI responses and being trusted as a cited source. inVia Robotics and Geek+ both carry 0.0 percent visibility yet hold citation rates of 62.5 and 25.0 percent respectively, meaning the AI references their content or domain without explicitly naming them in surface-level brand mentions. Brands ranked 8 through 10, including Zebra Fetch, Seegrid, and Berkshire Grey, score zero on both metrics, indicating complete absence from AI-generated responses across all measured queries.

Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, with no other engine credited in the top engine column. The top cited sources include youtube.com and g2.com alongside inviarobotics.com, marketsandmarkets.com, and several smaller specialist domains such as trossenrobotics.com and atomixrobot.com. This suggests the AI is anchoring its warehouse robotics software answers on a mix of video content, review platforms, brand-owned pages, and market research reports rather than on any single authoritative trade publication.

The AEO ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
inviarobotics.com
0% 62% Google AI Mode

inVia leads with a composite score of 18.8 and a category-high citation rate of 62.5 percent, yet records 0.0 percent visibility, a rare citation-without-mention pattern.

2
locusrobotics.com
12% 25% Google AI Mode

Locus Robotics scores 16.2 composite with balanced metrics of 12.5 percent visibility and 25.0 percent citation, making it the only top-5 brand with meaningful presence on both measures.

3
symbotic.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

Symbotic ties GreyOrange at a composite score of 12.5 with identical visibility and citation rates of 12.5 percent each, placing it mid-tier and well above the category average citation of 8.1 percent.

4
greyorange.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

GreyOrange matches Symbotic exactly at 12.5 percent visibility and 12.5 percent citation, sharing rank 3 composite parity and sitting above the 1.9 percent category average for visibility.

5
geekplus.com
0% 25% Google AI Mode

Geek+ records 0.0 percent visibility but a 25.0 percent citation rate, giving it a composite of 7.5 and indicating the AI uses its content as a source without surfacing it as a named brand.

6
ocadointelligentautomation.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
7
exotec.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
8
zebra.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
9
seegrid.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
10
berkshiregrey.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
11
addverb.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
tompkinsrobotics.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
vecnarobotics.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
swisslog.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
6river.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
autostore.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
hairobotics.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
quicktron.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
koerber-supplychain.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
dematic.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on warehouse robotics software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

youtube.comg2.cominviarobotics.commodula.usmarketsandmarkets.comlandbase.comtrossenrobotics.comatomixrobot.com

How to read this AEO ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →

AEO rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →

Run an AEO audit on your own warehouse robotics software brand

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your warehouse robotics software brand → Browse all AEO rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about AEO for warehouse robotics software

Who leads AI visibility in warehouse robotics software?

inVia Robotics holds the top composite score at 18.8, driven almost entirely by a citation rate of 62.5 percent rather than direct brand visibility. Locus Robotics ranks second with a composite of 16.2.

What is the average visibility for brands in warehouse robotics software?

The category average visibility is just 1.9 percent, and the average citation rate is 8.1 percent, indicating extremely limited AI surface area across the 20 brands audited.

Which brands appear in AI answers for warehouse robotics software but are not directly cited?

inVia Robotics and Geek+ both show 0.0 percent visibility alongside citation rates of 62.5 and 25.0 percent respectively, meaning their domains are referenced without explicit brand naming in AI responses.

What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for warehouse robotics software research?

The top cited sources include youtube.com, g2.com, inviarobotics.com, marketsandmarkets.com, and several smaller specialist domains such as trossenrobotics.com and atomixrobot.com.

Which warehouse robotics software brands have zero AI presence?

Zebra Fetch, Seegrid, and Berkshire Grey all record 0.0 percent on both visibility and citation, giving them a composite score of 0.0 and no measurable presence in Google AI Mode responses.

Is there any engine other than Google AI Mode driving visibility in this category?

No. Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for every brand in the dataset, with no alternative engine credited for any brand across the top 10 ranked results.