monitoraeo
AEO Rankings · SaaS

AEO for warehouse automation software: AI search visibility ranking

How AI search engines rank warehouse automation software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Warehouse automation platforms used to orchestrate robotics, picking, replenishment, labor, and fulfillment workflows across modern distribution operations. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

1%
Avg visibility across category
2%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

When asking AI engines about Warehouse automation software, Dematic frequently emerges as the leader in the field, with a visibility percentage of 12.5. Other notable mentions include Locus Robotics and SAP EWM. These brands stand out partly due to their prominence and recognition across various AI responses.

The rankings reflect data pulled from highly cited sources like youtube.com, guideflow.com, and review aggregator sites such as g2.com. These platforms contribute heavily to the visibility of top brands, indicating that public reviews and expert analyses are influential factors in shaping these rankings.

For buyers evaluating warehouse automation software, it's crucial to consider the platforms AI engines rely on, which favor recent reviews and credible third-party validation. Opt for brands that perform well across reputable industry sources to ensure alignment with AI-derived valuations and broader industry expertise.

At a glance

Category leader Dematic 12% visibility · named in 1 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Dematic 12% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in warehouse automation software
Top cited domain youtube.com Referenced by AI across the warehouse automation software query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 12pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 18 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this category

Dematic and Locus Robotics share the top two positions with identical composite scores of 12.5, while the category average visibility sits at just 1.2 percent. This means both leaders are scoring more than ten times the average, yet only two brands out of twenty are achieving any meaningful AI visibility at all. The concentration of AI presence at the very top, with a near-total blackout for ranks four through ten, signals an extremely winner-heavy landscape where most brands have no measurable footprint in Google AI Mode responses.

SAP EWM presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation: it holds zero visibility (0.0 percent) but carries a 12.5 percent citation rate, producing a composite score of just 3.8. This means Google AI Mode references SAP EWM as a source or supporting evidence without actively naming it in direct answer surfaces. Dematic and Locus Robotics show the opposite, with visibility and citation in perfect parity at 12.5 percent each, suggesting they are named and trusted in equal measure rather than one outpacing the other.

Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all twenty brands in this audit, with no outlier engines recorded for any individual brand. The top cited third-party sources include youtube.com, g2.com, gartner.com, and marketsandmarkets.com, pointing to a mix of review platforms, analyst reports, and video content as the primary anchors for AI-generated answers. The presence of logiwa.com and msdynamicsworld.com alongside Gartner suggests the AI is drawing on niche trade and ecosystem sources rather than relying solely on tier-one analyst coverage.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • Locus Robotics 0% → 12% · rank #3 → #2
    +12pp

Biggest visibility fallers

  • Blue Yonder 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #10
    -12pp

The AEO ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
dematic.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

Dematic leads jointly with a 12.5 percent visibility and citation score, both running at more than ten times the 1.2 percent category visibility average.

2
locusrobotics.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

Locus Robotics matches Dematic exactly at 12.5 percent on all metrics and is the category's biggest visibility riser, jumping from zero to 12.5 percent this period.

3
sap.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode

SAP EWM earns a 12.5 percent citation rate despite zero visibility, giving it a composite score of 3.8 and the clearest named-versus-trusted split in the dataset.

4
ocadointelligentautomation.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Ocado Intelligent Automation records zero across all three metrics, placing it among fifteen brands with no measurable AI presence in this audit cycle.

5
inviarobotics.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

inVia Robotics sits at zero visibility, zero citation, and a composite score of 0.0, identical to eleven other brands ranked four through twenty in this category.

6
mujin.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
7
quicktron.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
8
koerber-supplychain.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
9
fortna.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
10
blueyonder.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
11
swisslog.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
manh.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
zebra.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
geekplus.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
symbotic.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
autostoresystem.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
exotec.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
kardex.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
6river.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
greyorange.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on warehouse automation software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

youtube.comlogiwa.comguideflow.comg2.comfinaleinventory.comgartner.commsdynamicsworld.commarketsandmarkets.com

How to read this AEO ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →

AEO rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →

Run an AEO audit on your own warehouse automation software brand

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your warehouse automation software brand → Browse all AEO rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about AEO for warehouse automation software

Who leads AI visibility in warehouse automation software?

Dematic and Locus Robotics share the top position with identical visibility and citation scores of 12.5 percent each, both well above the category average of 1.2 percent.

How concentrated is AI visibility in this category?

Only two of twenty brands achieve any meaningful visibility, and the category average sits at just 1.2 percent, indicating a heavily winner-concentrated landscape in Google AI Mode.

Which brand shows the biggest gap between being cited and being named in AI answers?

SAP EWM has zero visibility but a 12.5 percent citation rate, meaning it is used as a reference source by Google AI Mode without being prominently named in direct answers.

What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for warehouse automation software queries?

The top cited sources include youtube.com, g2.com, gartner.com, marketsandmarkets.com, logiwa.com, and msdynamicsworld.com, combining review platforms, analyst reports, and trade publications.

Which brand has seen the biggest AI visibility movement recently?

Locus Robotics is the biggest riser, gaining 12.5 percentage points in visibility after recording zero in the previous period, while Blue Yonder fell by 12.5 points from rank one to rank ten.

Is any brand in this category performing well outside of Google AI Mode?

No, the audit records Google AI Mode as the top engine for all twenty brands, with no outlier performance on any alternative engine across the dataset.