Vulnerability scanning software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank vulnerability scanning software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Vulnerability scanning software used to identify exposed assets, detect weaknesses, prioritize remediation, and support ongoing security hygiene. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 17, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Tenable leads the vulnerability scanning software category with a visibility score of 37.5%, more than 12 points ahead of Qualys and Rapid7, who are tied at 25.0%. The category average sits at just 5.0%, meaning Tenable's presence is 7.5 times the average, a gap that signals a strongly concentrated AI recognition landscape. Greenbone registers a distant 12.5%, while the remaining 16 tracked brands score zero, confirming that AI Mode is surfacing only a narrow set of established players.
Every brand in the dataset carries a 0.0% citation rate, including the four brands that do register meaningful visibility scores. This creates a clear divergence: Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7, and Greenbone are named frequently enough to accumulate visibility, but none of their owned domains are being cited as source material. Being recognised as a vendor in AI narratives and being trusted enough to anchor a cited source are entirely separate outcomes in this category.
The top cited sources for this category are third-party and community destinations: youtube.com, gartner.com, owasp.org, redcanary.com, apiiro.com, ox.security, reddit.com, and cycognito.com. None are vendor-owned domains of the ranked brands. Google AI Mode appears to anchor its answers on analyst, open-source standards, and community platforms rather than on brand-controlled content, which explains why high-visibility brands still record zero citation.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Tenable 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1+38pp
-
Qualys 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Rapid7 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
tenable.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Tenable holds a 37.5% visibility score, 7.5 times the 5.0% category average, yet records 0.0% citation, matching every other brand in the dataset. |
||||
| 2 |
qualys.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Qualys sits joint second with Rapid7 at 25.0% visibility and a composite score of 17.5, trailing Tenable by 12.5 percentage points with identical zero citation performance. |
||||
| 3 |
rapid7.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Rapid7 matches Qualys exactly at 25.0% visibility and 17.5 composite score, sharing second place with no differentiation in citation rate between the two brands. |
||||
| 4 |
greenbone.net
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Greenbone registers 12.5% visibility and a composite score of 8.8, placing it as the only mid-tier brand with any AI presence between the top three and the zero-score majority. |
||||
| 5 |
intruder.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Intruder scores 0.0% on both visibility and citation despite holding rank 5, meaning its position reflects relative standing among brands with no measurable AI Mode presence. |
||||
| 6 |
acunetix.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
detectify.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
invicti.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
fortra.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
microsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
wiz.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
orca.security
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
manageengine.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
snyk.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
veracode.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
secpod.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
syxsense.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
beyondtrust.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
huntress.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
vulcan.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on vulnerability scanning software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own vulnerability scanning software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about vulnerability scanning software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in vulnerability scanning software?
Tenable leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 26.2, well ahead of Qualys and Rapid7, who are tied at 25.0% and 17.5 respectively.
What is the typical AI visibility level for brands in this category?
The category average is just 5.0%, and 16 of the 20 tracked brands score 0.0%, showing that meaningful AI presence is concentrated in only four vendors.
Which sources does Google AI Mode cite most for vulnerability scanning software research?
The top cited sources are youtube.com, gartner.com, owasp.org, redcanary.com, apiiro.com, ox.security, reddit.com, and cycognito.com, none of which are owned domains of the ranked vendors.
Do any vulnerability scanning brands earn citation credit in Google AI Mode?
No. Every brand in the dataset records a 0.0% citation rate, including Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7, and Greenbone, which all have positive visibility scores.
How large is the gap between named visibility and actual citation in this category?
The gap is absolute: four brands are named in AI responses at rates between 12.5% and 37.5%, yet all carry zero citation, confirming that vendor domains are not being used as source references.
Are there any brands that recently gained AI visibility in this category?
Tenable, Qualys, and Rapid7 are listed as the biggest visibility risers, each moving from 0.0% to their current scores, suggesting this category is newly entering measurable AI Mode coverage.