Vector databases: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank vector databases by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Vector databases used to store embeddings, run similarity search, and support retrieval-heavy AI applications and semantic discovery. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 18, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Pinecone, pgvector, and Qdrant each hold 25.0% visibility, placing them well above the category average of 5.6% and creating a clear three-way tier at the top. The next group, Redis, Milvus, and Chroma, sits at 12.5% each, roughly half the leaders' share. Below rank 6, brands including Weaviate, MongoDB Atlas, and Elastic record zero visibility, meaning more than half the 20 tracked brands are entirely absent from Google AI Mode responses in this category.
Every brand in this audit records a citation rate of 0.0%, meaning no brand's own domain is being cited even when it is named in AI responses. The top cited sources are youtube.com, reddit.com, zenml.io, and community.openai.com, indicating Google AI Mode draws supporting evidence from community and tutorial content rather than vendor sites. This creates a direct split between which brands are named as options and which domains are actually trusted as sources.
All top engines listed in the data point exclusively to Google AI Mode, confirming this audit captures a single-engine landscape with no cross-engine variation to report. Milvus and Chroma are the biggest risers, each gaining 12.5 visibility points from a previous base of zero. Pinecone and pgvector are the biggest fallers, each dropping 12.5 points from 37.5%, though both retain the joint-top position, suggesting the category's upper tier is compressing rather than reshuffling.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Milvus 0% → 12% · rank #5 → #5+12pp
-
Chroma 0% → 12% · rank #11 → #6+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Pinecone 38% → 25% · rank #1 → #1-12pp
-
pgvector 38% → 25% · rank #2 → #2-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
pinecone.io
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Pinecone leads jointly at 25.0% visibility but has fallen from 37.5%, while its citation rate remains 0.0%, matching every other brand in the category. |
||||
| 2 |
pgvector.org
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
pgvector shares the top 25.0% visibility score with Pinecone and Qdrant but also fell from 37.5%, and its 0.0% citation rate offers no differentiation on trust signals. |
||||
| 3 |
qdrant.tech
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Qdrant holds 25.0% visibility at rank 3 without any recorded decline, making it the most stable of the three joint leaders against the 5.6% category average. |
||||
| 4 |
redis.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Redis sits at 12.5% visibility, exactly half the top-tier score, with a 0.0% citation rate that mirrors every other brand and no movement in the risers or fallers data. |
||||
| 5 |
milvus.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Milvus rose from 0.0% to 12.5% visibility, making it the joint biggest riser, though its citation rate dropped 12.5 points, creating an unusual gain-in-mentions, loss-in-citations pattern. |
||||
| 6 |
trychroma.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
elastic.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
mongodb.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
weaviate.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
vald.vdaas.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
zilliz.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
datastax.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
vespa.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
neo4j.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
singlestore.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
lancedb.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
couchbase.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
marqo.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
typesense.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on vector databases, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own vector databases brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about vector databases AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the vector databases category?
Pinecone, pgvector, and Qdrant share the top position, each at 25.0% visibility, well above the category average of 5.6%. No single brand holds a clear solo lead.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most when responding to vector database queries?
The top cited sources are youtube.com, reddit.com, zenml.io, and community.openai.com. No brand's own domain is cited, indicating AI responses rely on community and tutorial content rather than vendor sites.
Is there any brand in this category with meaningful citation rates?
No. Every brand in the audit records a citation rate of 0.0%, meaning being named in an AI response does not translate to the brand's domain being cited as a source.
Which brands have gained the most AI visibility recently in vector databases?
Milvus and Chroma are the biggest risers, both jumping from 0.0% to 12.5% visibility. Chroma also moved from rank 11 to rank 6 in the process.
Are established brands like Weaviate and MongoDB Atlas visible in Google AI Mode for this category?
No. Both Weaviate and MongoDB Atlas record 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation rate, placing them among the majority of tracked brands with no current AI Mode presence.
How concentrated is AI visibility in the vector databases category?
The top three brands account for 75.0% of total visibility collectively, while more than half the 20 tracked brands record zero visibility, making this a heavily top-concentrated category.