AEO for UI/UX design agencies: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank UI/UX design agencies by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. UI and UX design agencies focused on product strategy, interface design, user research, prototyping, and digital experience improvement. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask AI engines about UI/UX design agencies, Clay stands out as the leader in this category. It has a visibility rate of 50%, making it a frequent recommendation among AI platforms. Work & Co and Ramotion are other notable names that consistently appear in these discussions, although Clay remains the most recognized brand.
The rankings are primarily shaped by sources like reddit.com, agency.uxplanet.org, and clutch.co, where discussions and reviews influence AI engine responses. Sites like these often aggregate user reviews and expert opinions, providing a thorough overview of agency reputations, which is reflected in the rankings. This deep pool of information helps establish authority and trustworthiness among brands.
For buyers evaluating agencies from this list, one key factor is the emphasis AI engines place on recent reviews and third-party validation. Look for agencies with strong topical authority in subcategories relevant to your project needs. The engines prioritize credibility from trusted sources, so consider brands that maintain a positive presence across multiple review platforms.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Clay dominates this category with a visibility score of 50.0%, more than double the 25.0% held by second-placed Work & Co and Ramotion, against a category average of just 8.8%. That gap is significant because it means Clay appears in AI-generated responses at a rate that no other brand in the set can match. Clay also grew its visibility by 12.5 percentage points from the previous period, confirming that its lead is widening rather than consolidating at a plateau.
Citation rate diverges sharply from visibility across this category. Work & Co and Ramotion both hold 25.0% visibility yet carry 0.0% citation rates, meaning the AI names them but does not link to them as sources. Eleken, ranked fourth with only 12.5% visibility, matches Clay's citation rate of 25.0%, suggesting it earns more source-level trust per mention than brands ranked above it. This named-versus-trusted split is the defining structural tension in this category's AI footprint.
Every brand in the top ten lists Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming this category's AI visibility is concentrated entirely within that single platform. The cited sources list anchors on third-party directories and community platforms, with reddit.com, clutch.co, agency.uxplanet.org, and uiuxagencyrankings.com all appearing alongside clay.global as a direct brand domain. The presence of clay.global in that source list is notable because no other brand domain from the ranked set appears there, reinforcing Clay's structural advantage.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Ramotion 0% → 25% · rank #10 → #3+25pp
-
Clay 38% → 50% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
-
Work & Co 12% → 25% · rank #5 → #2+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
MetaLab 38% → 0% · rank #3 → #10-38pp
-
IDEO 38% → 12% · rank #4 → #6-25pp
-
Neuron 25% → 12% · rank #2 → #5-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
clay.global
|
50% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Clay leads at 50.0% visibility, nearly 6x the 8.8% category average, and is the only ranked brand whose own domain appears in the cited sources list. |
||||
| 2 |
work.co
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Work & Co matches Ramotion at 25.0% visibility but holds a 0.0% citation rate, gaining three rank positions this period while earning no source-level trust from the AI. |
||||
| 3 |
ramotion.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Ramotion jumped seven rank positions with a 25.0 percentage point visibility gain, yet its citation rate fell by 12.5 points, signalling a visibility rise without growing source credibility. |
||||
| 4 |
eleken.co
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Eleken's 25.0% citation rate equals Clay's and outperforms all peers ranked above it, despite having only 12.5% visibility, the lowest of any cited brand in the set. |
||||
| 5 |
neuronux.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Neuron fell three rank positions with a 12.5 point visibility drop and a 37.5 point citation collapse, the steepest citation decline recorded across the entire dataset. |
||||
| 6 |
ideo.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
frog.co
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
gojilabs.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
bynd.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
metalab.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
momentumdesignlab.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
lazarev.agency
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
akqa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
rga.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
hugeinc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
ustwo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
spaceberry.studio
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
createape.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
fantasy.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
design.studio
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on UI/UX design agencies, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own UI/UX design agencies brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for UI/UX design agencies
Who leads AI visibility in the UI/UX design agencies category?
Clay leads with 50.0% visibility, more than double the 25.0% held by the next-ranked brands Work & Co and Ramotion, and well above the 8.8% category average.
Which brand is most cited as a source by Google AI Mode in this category?
Clay and Eleken share the highest citation rate at 25.0% each. Clay is also the only ranked brand whose own domain (clay.global) appears in the top cited sources list for the category.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when responding to UI/UX agency queries?
The top cited sources include reddit.com, agency.uxplanet.org, uiuxagencyrankings.com, clutch.co, linkedin.com, youtube.com, fuselabcreative.com, and clay.global.
Which brand saw the biggest drop in AI visibility this period?
MetaLab fell from 37.5% to 0.0% visibility, a 37.5 percentage point decline, dropping seven rank positions from third to tenth in the process.
Can a brand have high visibility but low citation in this category?
Yes. Work & Co and Ramotion both hold 25.0% visibility with 0.0% citation rates, confirming that being named by the AI does not guarantee being linked as a trusted source.
Is AI visibility in this category spread across multiple engines or concentrated in one?
It is entirely concentrated in one platform. Every brand in the top ten lists Google AI Mode as their top engine, with no other engine appearing in the dataset.