AEO for threat intelligence platforms: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank threat intelligence platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Threat intelligence platforms used to collect, correlate, and operationalize adversary, malware, infrastructure, and campaign data for security teams. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When asked about Threat intelligence platforms, AI engines often highlight Recorded Future as the leader in the space. With a visibility percentage of 50, it stands out in mentions. Other notable brands that frequently appear are CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence and Microsoft Threat Intelligence, which also receive significant attention from AI-driven queries.
The rankings reflect substantial visibility from popular domain sources like Reddit, G2.com, and Shadowdragon.io. These sites are extensively referenced, indicating an aggregation of reviews and discussions that shape the AI's choices. Insights from these sources help explain why certain brands see increased visibility, as they pull from platforms trusted by many users and evaluators.
For buyers, this means considering how AI engines value brand mentions. They prioritize updated reviews, third-party validation, and topical authority. When evaluating options, focus on platforms like G2.com or Reddit to see real-world user experiences and expert opinions. This approach ensures you choose a brand with credible validations from widely recognized sources.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Recorded Future dominates this category with a visibility score of 50.0%, more than double the second-ranked CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence at 25.0%, and far above the category average of 3.8%. This gap is significant because it means Google AI Mode surfaces Recorded Future in half of all sampled queries while most competitors register zero visibility. CrowdStrike rose from rank 4 to rank 2 with a 25.0 percentage point visibility increase, making it the only other brand with any meaningful named presence in AI-generated responses.
A clear divergence exists between being named in AI responses and being cited as a source. Microsoft Threat Intelligence, Anomali, and Unit 42 each hold 0.0% visibility yet each carries a 25.0% citation rate, matching Recorded Future's own citation figure. This means AI Mode is referencing those brands as supporting evidence without surfacing them as primary recommendations. CrowdStrike shows the inverse pattern: its visibility rose 25 points while its citation rate fell 25 points, suggesting it is being named more but linked to less.
The top cited sources in this category are dominated by third-party review and community platforms: reddit.com, g2.com, learn.g2.com, gartner.com, and niche analyst sites such as shadowdragon.io, cloudsek.com, heightscg.com, and underdefense.com. None of these are the vendor domains themselves. This indicates Google AI Mode is anchoring its threat intelligence responses on external review and comparison content rather than pulling directly from vendor sites, which may explain why high-authority brands like Mandiant Advantage and Cisco Talos hold 0.0% on both visibility and citation.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Recorded Future 25% → 50% · rank #1 → #1+25pp
-
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence 0% → 25% · rank #4 → #2+25pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Anomali 12% → 0% · rank #2 → #4-12pp
-
ThreatConnect 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #7-12pp
-
Cybersixgill 12% → 0% · rank #5 → #11-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
recordedfuture.com
|
50% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Recorded Future leads with 50.0% visibility and a composite score of 42.5, more than double CrowdStrike and 13 times the 3.8% category average visibility. |
||||
| 2 |
crowdstrike.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
CrowdStrike climbed two ranks with a 25.0 point visibility gain, but its citation rate fell 25 points simultaneously, creating a split between presence and referencing. |
||||
| 3 |
microsoft.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Microsoft holds 0.0% visibility yet a 25.0% citation rate, matching the top brand on citations alone while never appearing as a named primary recommendation. |
||||
| 4 |
anomali.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Anomali dropped from rank 2 to rank 4 with a 12.5 point visibility loss, yet its citation rate rose 12.5 points, mirroring Microsoft's cited-but-unnamed pattern. |
||||
| 5 |
paloaltonetworks.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Unit 42 holds 0.0% visibility and a composite score of 7.5, identical to Microsoft and Anomali, indicating a cluster of zero-visibility but moderately cited brands at ranks 3 to 5. |
||||
| 6 |
group-ib.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
threatconnect.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
flashpoint.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
mandiant.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
talosintelligence.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
cybersixgill.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
eclecticiq.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
socradar.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
intel471.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
zerofox.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
lookingglasscyber.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
kela.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
greynoise.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
team-cymru.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
searchlightcyber.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on threat intelligence platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own threat intelligence platforms brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for threat intelligence platforms
Who leads AI visibility in threat intelligence platforms?
Recorded Future leads with 50.0% visibility and a composite score of 42.5, far ahead of CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence at 25.0% and the 3.8% category average.
Which brands are cited by Google AI Mode but not named in responses?
Microsoft Threat Intelligence, Anomali, and Unit 42 each hold 0.0% visibility but 25.0% citation rates, meaning AI Mode references them as evidence without surfacing them as primary recommendations.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for threat intelligence research?
The top cited sources are reddit.com, shadowdragon.io, cloudsek.com, g2.com, underdefense.com, gartner.com, heightscg.com, and learn.g2.com, all third-party review or community platforms rather than vendor domains.
Which brands have seen the biggest recent visibility changes in this category?
Recorded Future gained 25 visibility points and CrowdStrike gained 25 points to become the top two risers, while Anomali, ThreatConnect, and Cybersixgill each lost 12.5 points and fell to 0.0% visibility.
How concentrated is AI visibility across the 20 brands in this category?
Visibility is highly concentrated: only two of the top 10 brands hold any visibility at all, with the remaining 8 at 0.0%, and the category average sits at just 3.8%.
Do well-known brands like Mandiant Advantage and Cisco Talos appear in Google AI Mode responses?
No. Both Mandiant Advantage and Cisco Talos hold 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation rates, giving them composite scores of 0.0 despite their market recognition.