Supply chain planning software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank supply chain planning software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Planning platforms used to forecast demand, balance inventory, coordinate suppliers, optimize replenishment, and improve supply chain resilience. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 10, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
OMP dominates Google AI Mode visibility in supply chain planning software with a perfect 100% visibility score, against a category average of just 10%. That 62.5-percentage-point gap to second-placed Kinaxis (37.5%) is substantial, and the drop to the third-ranked brand Netstock at 25% continues sharply. Only five of the top ten brands register any visibility at all, meaning the majority of tracked brands are effectively invisible in AI-generated responses for this category.
A notable divergence exists between which brands are named and which are cited as sources. OMP leads on visibility yet holds a 0% citation rate, as do o9 Solutions at rank five. By contrast, Slimstock ranks fourth on visibility at 12.5% but achieves the highest citation rate in the top five at 37.5%. SAP IBP, ToolsGroup, and RELEX Solutions each hold 0% visibility yet each carry a 25% citation rate, meaning AI responses reference their content without naming them as recommended solutions.
Google AI Mode is the dominant — and apparently sole — engine driving all brand appearances in this audit, with every brand listing it as their top engine. The external sources the AI anchors on for category research skew toward third-party review and analyst platforms: Gartner and G2 appear alongside niche supply chain outlets such as supplychaindigital.com, datup.ai, and lokad.com. YouTube also features as a top cited source, suggesting AI responses in this category draw on video content alongside written editorial.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
OMP 0% → 100% · rank #0 → #1+100pp
-
Kinaxis 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #2+38pp
-
Netstock 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
omp.com
|
100% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
OMP holds a category-leading 100% visibility score — ten times the 10% category average — yet its 0% citation rate means AI names it without anchoring on its own content. |
||||
| 2 |
kinaxis.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Kinaxis sits 62.5 percentage points below OMP on visibility (37.5%) but matches Netstock's 12.5% citation rate, making it the strongest all-round performer outside the category leader. |
||||
| 3 |
netstock.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Netstock's 25% visibility is 2.5x the category average, and its 12.5% citation rate puts it ahead of higher-composite-scored peers like o9 Solutions, which cites at 0%. |
||||
| 4 |
slimstock.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Slimstock presents the sharpest visibility-citation divergence in the top five: only 12.5% visibility yet the highest citation rate among them at 37.5%, suggesting strong third-party content presence. |
||||
| 5 |
o9solutions.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
o9 Solutions matches Netstock's 25% visibility but records 0% citations, indicating AI surfaces it by name without drawing on any o9-linked or o9-referencing sources. |
||||
| 6 |
sap.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
toolsgroup.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
relexsolutions.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
logility.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
anaplan.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
johngalt.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
arkieva.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
blueyonder.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
coupa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
e2open.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
planettogether.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
infor.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
3ds.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
aeratechnology.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on supply chain planning software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own supply chain planning software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about supply chain planning software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in supply chain planning software?
OMP leads with a 100% visibility score in Google AI Mode, far ahead of second-ranked Kinaxis at 37.5% and a category average of just 10%.
Which brands are cited most by AI in supply chain planning software despite low visibility?
SAP IBP, ToolsGroup, and RELEX Solutions each hold 0% visibility yet all carry a 25% citation rate, meaning AI uses their content as a source without naming them as top solutions.
What sources does AI cite most for supply chain planning software research?
The most cited external sources include Gartner, G2, supplychaindigital.com, datup.ai, lokad.com, and YouTube, indicating AI anchors on analyst, review, and niche editorial content.
Is there a gap between which brands AI names and which brands AI trusts as sources?
Yes — OMP and o9 Solutions both have 0% citation rates despite visible AI mentions, while Slimstock's 37.5% citation rate far exceeds its 12.5% visibility, showing named and cited brands are not the same.
How concentrated is AI visibility in this category?
Visibility is highly concentrated: only 5 of the top 10 tracked brands appear in any AI responses, and the category average visibility sits at just 10% across all 20 brands.
Which AI engine dominates supply chain planning software responses?
Google AI Mode is the sole top engine recorded for every brand in this audit, with no other engine contributing to any brand's leading visibility position.