Status page software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank status page software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Incident communication platforms used to publish system status, outage updates, maintenance notices, and uptime transparency for customers. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 20, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Hyperping leads the status page software category with a composite score of 56.2, built on a 100% citation rate despite a visibility score of only 37.5%. Instatus sits second with higher visibility at 50% but a 0% citation rate, producing a composite of just 35.0. That gap of 21.2 composite points between first and second place is driven entirely by citation behaviour, not raw mention frequency, making the lead meaningful rather than superficial.
The divergence between visibility and citation is the defining pattern in this category. Instatus is named more often than Hyperping yet is never cited as a source, while Hyperping is cited every time it appears. Atlassian Statuspage, a well-known enterprise brand, registers only 12.5% on both metrics. Brands ranked 4 through 10, including Cachet, Better Stack Status Pages, and Checkly, score zero on both measures, suggesting AI responses largely ignore the majority of the market.
Google AI Mode is the sole engine recorded across all 20 brands, confirming this category's AI visibility is entirely concentrated in one engine. The top cited sources include hyperping.com, github.com, reddit.com, augmentcode.com, and openstatus.dev, indicating the AI anchors on community and open-source reference points alongside vendor content. All three visible brands also recorded falling visibility this period, with Hyperping dropping from 75% to 37.5% and Instatus from 75% to 50%, signalling a contracting AI footprint across the category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Hyperping 75% → 38% · rank #1 → #1-38pp
-
Instatus 75% → 50% · rank #2 → #2-25pp
-
Atlassian Statuspage 25% → 12% · rank #3 → #3-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
hyperping.com
|
38% | 100% | Google AI Mode |
Hyperping holds the top composite score of 56.2 due to a 100% citation rate, well above the category average citation rate of 5.6%, despite visibility of only 37.5%. |
||||
| 2 |
instatus.com
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Instatus has the highest visibility in the category at 50%, nearly ten times the 5% category average, but its 0% citation rate limits its composite score to 35.0. |
||||
| 3 |
atlassian.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Atlassian Statuspage scores 12.5% on both visibility and citation, placing it the only brand other than the top two with any AI presence, but far behind both peers. |
||||
| 4 |
cachethq.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cachet registers zero on visibility, citation, and composite score, matching 16 other brands in the dataset and sitting entirely outside Google AI Mode responses. |
||||
| 5 |
betterstack.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Better Stack Status Pages scores zero across all metrics, a notable absence given its broader uptime monitoring presence and the category's low bar for any AI visibility. |
||||
| 6 |
status.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
hund.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
pulsetic.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
checklyhq.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
uptime.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
freshworks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
sorryapp.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
statuspal.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
statushub.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
pingdom.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
ohdear.app
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
uptrends.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
hetrixtools.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
cachethq.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
cronitor.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on status page software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own status page software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about status page software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in status page software?
Hyperping leads with a composite score of 56.2, driven by a 100% citation rate. Instatus is second at 35.0 despite higher raw visibility of 50%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for status page software research?
The top cited sources are hyperping.com, github.com, reddit.com, augmentcode.com, openstatus.dev, youtube.com, uptimerobot.com, and visualsentinel.com, indicating a mix of vendor, open-source, and community content.
How does citation rate differ from visibility in this category?
Instatus has 50% visibility but 0% citation, while Hyperping has 37.5% visibility and 100% citation, showing that being mentioned and being trusted as a source are separate outcomes in this category.
What share of brands in this category have any AI visibility at all?
Only 3 of the 20 tracked brands, Hyperping, Instatus, and Atlassian Statuspage, register any visibility or citation score. The remaining 17 score zero on both measures.
Is AI visibility in this category growing or shrinking?
Visibility is falling for all three visible brands. Hyperping dropped from 75% to 37.5% and Instatus from 75% to 50%, with no brands recorded as risers this period.
Which AI engine dominates status page software visibility?
Google AI Mode is the only engine recorded across all 20 brands in this category, meaning the entire AI visibility landscape is concentrated in a single engine.