Single sign-on software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank single sign-on software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Single sign-on platforms used to centralize authentication, streamline employee access, and secure login flows across business applications and devices. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 12, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Okta leads the single sign-on software category with a visibility score of 50.0%, more than 12 percentage points ahead of second-ranked Microsoft Entra ID at 37.5%. Both brands sit far above the category average of 6.9%, meaning the remaining 18 tracked brands are largely absent from AI-generated responses. That concentration at the top signals that Google AI Mode has formed strong associations with a small number of vendors, making the gap between leaders and the rest structurally significant for any brand trying to enter the visible tier.
The most striking divergence between visibility and citation is found in miniOrange, which holds only 12.5% visibility yet carries a 37.5% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the dataset. Microsoft Entra ID shows the opposite pattern, achieving 37.5% visibility with zero citations recorded. Okta is the only brand where both metrics are meaningfully positive, at 50.0% visibility and 12.5% citations. This split suggests that being named in an AI response and being used as a source reference are distinct and not reliably correlated outcomes in this category.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, indicating that citation and visibility data here is anchored almost entirely on that single surface. Among the top cited external sources, youtube.com and miniorange.com appear alongside review aggregator capterra.com and community platform reddit.com. The presence of smaller specialist domains such as oloid.com, cloudeagle.ai, scalekit.com, and getkisi.com in the cited sources list suggests that AI is drawing on a mix of niche technical content and user-generated discussion rather than relying solely on vendor or major publisher domains.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Okta 38% → 50% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
-
Microsoft Entra ID 25% → 38% · rank #3 → #2+12pp
-
WorkOS 0% → 12% · rank #6 → #4+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
JumpCloud 25% → 12% · rank #4 → #5-12pp
-
OneLogin 12% → 0% · rank #5 → #7-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
okta.com
|
50% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Okta leads all 20 tracked brands with 50.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, both figures well above the category averages of 6.9% and 3.1% respectively. |
||||
| 2 |
microsoft.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Microsoft Entra ID holds 37.5% visibility after a 12.5-point gain from its previous period, but records zero citation, the sharpest visibility-to-citation gap among the top five. |
||||
| 3 |
miniorange.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
miniOrange has only 12.5% visibility yet its 37.5% citation rate is the highest in the entire dataset, making it the category's most-cited source relative to its named presence. |
||||
| 4 |
workos.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
WorkOS entered the visible tier this period, rising from 0.0% to 12.5% visibility, though its citation rate dropped by 12.5 points simultaneously, suggesting inconsistent AI treatment. |
||||
| 5 |
jumpcloud.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
JumpCloud fell one rank after losing 12.5 visibility points from the prior period, and records zero citations, leaving it tied on composite score with Auth0 at 8.8. |
||||
| 6 |
auth0.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
onelogin.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
pingidentity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
duo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
cyberark.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
sailpoint.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
secureauth.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
manageengine.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
rippling.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
keepersecurity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
lastpass.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
fusionauth.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
frontegg.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
descope.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
keycloak.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on single sign-on software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own single sign-on software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about single sign-on software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in single sign-on software?
Okta leads with 50.0% visibility and a composite score of 38.8, more than 12 points ahead of second-placed Microsoft Entra ID at 37.5%.
What is the average AI visibility for single sign-on software brands?
The category average visibility is 6.9% and the average citation rate is 3.1%, indicating that most of the 20 tracked brands have near-zero presence in AI-generated responses.
Which brand has the highest citation rate despite low visibility in this category?
miniOrange holds a 37.5% citation rate while its visibility sits at just 12.5%, meaning it is referenced as a source far more often than it is named as a recommended brand.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for single sign-on software research?
The top cited sources include youtube.com, miniorange.com, capterra.com, reddit.com, and several niche domains such as oloid.com, cloudeagle.ai, scalekit.com, and getkisi.com.
Which brands are gaining AI visibility momentum in this category?
Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and WorkOS each gained 12.5 visibility points in the most recent period, with WorkOS rising from 0.0% to enter the visible tier for the first time.
Are any established SSO vendors absent from AI-generated responses?
Yes, OneLogin, Ping Identity, Duo Security, and CyberArk all record 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation, meaning Google AI Mode currently does not name or cite them in SSO-related responses.