AEO for shift planning software: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank shift planning software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Shift planning software used to schedule hourly teams, optimize rosters, manage availability, handle labor compliance, and keep frontline operations staffed efficiently. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask AI engines about shift planning software, Homebase consistently emerges as the leading brand. With a 50% visibility rate, Homebase is mentioned most often, followed by Deputy and Connecteam. This reflects the prominence and trust Homebase has established within the industry, making it a top choice among evaluators.
The ranking of these brands is heavily influenced by citations from sources like YouTube, Homebase's own site, and Reddit. The presence of aggregator and review sites, such as Zapier, also play a role, suggesting that these rankings are based on a combination of expert reviews and user feedback, providing a balanced view of the software landscape.
For buyers, the visibility and citation percentage highlights the importance of recent and validated third-party reviews when selecting a tool from the list. AI engines value these insights, which can guide you to software with strong community backing and authoritative feedback, ensuring informed decision-making in choosing the right shift planning tool for your needs.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Homebase leads the shift planning software category with a composite score of 53.8, ahead of Deputy (46.2) and Connecteam (38.8). The gap between first and fourth place is meaningful: When I Work scores just 30.0, and 7shifts drops to 26.2. Homebase also recorded the largest visibility jump in the audit period, rising from 12.5% to 50.0% visibility and climbing from rank 3 to rank 1, signalling a sharp and recent change in how Google AI Mode is weighting this brand.
Visibility and citation do not move in lockstep across this category. Connecteam sits at rank 3 with 50.0% visibility but only 12.5% citation, suggesting it is named frequently but rarely trusted enough to be sourced directly. Shiftboard shows the reverse pattern, with just 12.5% visibility but 25.0% citation. Sling and Zoho Shifts both hold 0.0% visibility yet each carry a 12.5% citation rate, meaning the AI references them without surfacing them as primary answers.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the category's AI visibility is effectively a single-engine competition. The top cited sources include youtube.com, joinhomebase.com, reddit.com, and zapier.com, pointing to a mix of user-generated content, brand-owned domains, and third-party review or integration content. The presence of soon.works, easyclocking.com, and mangoapps.com among cited sources suggests the AI is drawing on niche or adjacent HR content sites rather than only mainstream software review platforms.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Homebase 12% → 50% · rank #3 → #1+38pp
-
When I Work 0% → 38% · rank #5 → #4+38pp
-
Deputy 25% → 50% · rank #2 → #2+25pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
joinhomebase.com
|
50% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Homebase leads all brands with a 53.8 composite score and a 62.5% citation rate, the highest in the category, more than four times the 8.8% category average citation rate. |
||||
| 2 |
deputy.com
|
50% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Deputy matches Homebase on visibility at 50.0% but trails on citation at 37.5%, a 25-point gap that costs it the top composite score despite holding rank 2 throughout the audit. |
||||
| 3 |
connecteam.com
|
50% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Connecteam achieves 50.0% visibility, on par with the top two, but its 12.5% citation rate is the lowest among the top three, pulling its composite score down to 38.8. |
||||
| 4 |
wheniwork.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
When I Work rose from 0.0% to 37.5% visibility in the audit period, a gain of 37.5 points, yet its citation rate remains at 12.5%, leaving it with a composite score of 30.0. |
||||
| 5 |
7shifts.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
7shifts holds 37.5% visibility, above the 11.9% category average, but records a 0.0% citation rate, the only top-5 brand with no direct AI citations in this period. |
||||
| 6 |
shiftboard.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
getsling.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
zoho.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
planday.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
findmyshift.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
partech.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
ukg.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
workday.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
dayforce.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
tcpsoftware.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
humanity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
skedulo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
papershift.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
quinyx.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
teamsense.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on shift planning software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own shift planning software brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for shift planning software
Who leads AI visibility in shift planning software?
Homebase leads with a composite score of 53.8, a visibility rate of 50.0%, and a category-high citation rate of 62.5%. It also recorded the largest visibility gain in the audit period, rising 37.5 percentage points.
Which shift planning brands are named by AI but rarely cited as sources?
Connecteam has 50.0% visibility but only 12.5% citation, and 7shifts has 37.5% visibility with 0.0% citation, indicating both are mentioned in AI responses but not used as reference sources.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for shift planning software research?
The top cited sources in this category are youtube.com, joinhomebase.com, reddit.com, zapier.com, and a set of niche sites including soon.works, easyclocking.com, and mangoapps.com.
Which brands have citation rates above their visibility rates in this category?
Shiftboard (12.5% visibility, 25.0% citation), Sling (0.0% visibility, 12.5% citation), and Zoho Shifts (0.0% visibility, 12.5% citation) all show citation rates exceeding their visibility scores.
How concentrated is AI visibility in the shift planning software category?
Visibility is highly concentrated at the top: the category average visibility is just 11.9%, while the top three brands each reach 50.0%, and brands ranked 9 and 10 score 0.0% on both visibility and citation.
Which engine dominates AI visibility for shift planning software brands?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, making this category's AI visibility landscape a single-engine competition with no meaningful contribution recorded from other engines.