Self-storage facilities in Memphis: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank self-storage facilities in memphis by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Self-storage operators serving Memphis renters, homeowners, students, and businesses with climate-controlled units, drive-up storage, vehicle storage, and flexible rental options. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 19, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Extra Space Storage leads the Memphis self-storage category by a substantial margin, holding 75% visibility and a 71.2 composite score against a category average of just 8.8%. The next closest brand, Devon Self Storage, sits at 62.5% visibility, while Public Storage trails at 37.5%. Every other tracked brand registers zero visibility. That concentration means the top two brands account for nearly all AI surface area in this category, leaving the remaining 17 brands effectively invisible to Google AI Mode users.
Devon Self Storage presents a striking divergence between visibility and citation. It appears in 62.5% of AI responses but carries a 0.0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode names it but never links to it as a trusted source. Extra Space Storage and Public Storage both earn citations proportional to their visibility, at 62.5% and 37.5% respectively. Devon is the only brand in the top three where being named does not translate into being cited, which significantly weakens its authority signal in this engine.
The cited sources list reveals that Google AI Mode anchors heavily on aggregator and review platforms alongside brand domains. Google.com itself appears first, followed by extraspace.com and publicstorage.com, then third-party sites including storagecafe.com, reddit.com, m.yelp.com, betterselfstorage.com, and recnationstorage.com. Devon Self Storage's domain does not appear in the cited sources list despite its high visibility, which explains the 0.0% citation rate and confirms the engine is not treating devonselfstorage.com as a reference source for this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Extra Space Storage 62% → 75% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
U-Haul 12% → 0% · rank #4 → #4-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
extraspace.com
|
75% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Extra Space Storage leads all brands with 75% visibility and 62.5% citation rate, both well above the category averages of 8.8% and 5.0%, and its domain appears directly in the cited sources list. |
||||
| 2 |
devonselfstorage.com
|
62% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Devon Self Storage reaches 62.5% visibility, far above the 8.8% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate makes it the only top-three brand with a named-but-never-cited profile in Google AI Mode. |
||||
| 3 |
publicstorage.com
|
38% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Public Storage holds 37.5% visibility and a matching 37.5% citation rate, placing it third overall and confirming its domain is treated as a credible reference source by Google AI Mode. |
||||
| 4 |
uhaul.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
U-Haul dropped from 12.5% visibility in the prior period to 0.0% now, making it the category's biggest faller and leaving it with a zero composite score despite its national brand recognition. |
||||
| 5 |
cubesmart.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
CubeSmart sits at rank 5 with 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation rate, matching six other brands at the bottom and contributing nothing to the category's AI visibility pool. |
||||
| 6 |
lifestorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
istorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
storagemart.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
smartstopselfstorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
securespace.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
go-store-it.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
compassselfstorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
metroselfstorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
storagekingusa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
morningstarstorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
nsastorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
simplyss.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
storespace.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
minimallstorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
primestorage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on self-storage facilities in memphis, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own self-storage facilities in memphis brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about self-storage facilities in memphis AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the Memphis self-storage category?
Extra Space Storage leads with 75% visibility and a 71.2 composite score, far above the category average of 8.8%. It is the only brand in the category showing both high visibility and a strong citation rate.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Memphis self-storage research?
The top cited sources are google.com, extraspace.com, and publicstorage.com, followed by third-party platforms including storagecafe.com, reddit.com, m.yelp.com, betterselfstorage.com, and recnationstorage.com.
Which brand has the biggest gap between visibility and citation in this category?
Devon Self Storage has a 62.5% visibility rate but a 0.0% citation rate, the largest named-versus-cited gap among all tracked brands. Its domain does not appear in the cited sources list for this category.
How concentrated is AI visibility across Memphis self-storage brands?
Three brands hold all measurable visibility: Extra Space Storage at 75%, Devon Self Storage at 62.5%, and Public Storage at 37.5%. The remaining 17 tracked brands, including U-Haul and CubeSmart, all register 0.0% visibility.
Which brand lost the most AI visibility in the most recent period?
U-Haul dropped 12.5 percentage points, falling from 12.5% visibility to 0.0%, making it the category's biggest faller. Its citation rate also remained at 0.0% throughout both periods.
Does high AI visibility in this category guarantee citation by Google AI Mode?
Not for all brands. Devon Self Storage demonstrates that a brand can appear in 62.5% of AI responses without receiving a single citation, indicating Google AI Mode treats visibility and source trustworthiness as separate signals.