Radiology PACS systems: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank radiology pacs systems by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Radiology PACS systems used to store, retrieve, view, and share medical images across hospitals, imaging centers, teleradiology groups, and enterprise radiology teams. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 16, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Sectra holds the dominant position in this category with 50% visibility, more than double the 25% scored by Visage Imaging and GE HealthCare in joint second place. The category average visibility sits at just 6.9%, making Sectra's score roughly seven times the norm. That gap is significant because it means Sectra appears in AI-generated responses far more consistently than any competitor, giving it a structural advantage in the consideration stage for buyers researching PACS systems through Google AI Mode.
A striking pattern across all 20 brands is the near-total absence of citation activity. Every brand in the top six records 0% citation, and the only brand with any citation presence is Intelerad at 12.5%, despite having zero visibility. This means Intelerad is being referenced as a source or linked entity without appearing in named recommendations, while brands like Philips and Siemens Healthineers, both major market players, register 0% on both measures, showing a clear disconnect between market prominence and AI visibility.
The top cited sources in this category are radiologybusiness.com, klasresearch.com, and engage.klasresearch.com, alongside community platforms like reddit.com and linkedin.com. KLAS Research appearing twice in the source list suggests Google AI Mode is anchoring heavily on third-party analyst and review content when generating PACS-related responses. The presence of reddit.com and linkedin.com indicates the AI is also drawing on peer discussion forums, which are less controlled channels for any brand attempting to manage its AI presence.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Visage Imaging 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
GE HealthCare 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
-
Sectra 38% → 50% · rank #0 → #1+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
sectra.com
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sectra leads with 50% visibility and a composite score of 35.0, more than double the next closest brands and roughly seven times the 6.9% category average. |
||||
| 2 |
visageimaging.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Visage Imaging ties GE HealthCare at 25% visibility and 17.5 composite score, having risen from 0% previously, making it the biggest new entrant in AI visibility this period. |
||||
| 3 |
gehealthcare.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
GE HealthCare matches Visage Imaging at 25% visibility but carries far greater brand recognition outside AI Mode, suggesting its broader market presence does not convert to AI citation advantage. |
||||
| 4 |
carestream.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Carestream sits at 12.5% visibility with a composite score of 8.8, above the 6.9% category average but recording zero citations, limiting its AI presence to named mentions only. |
||||
| 5 |
agfa.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Agfa HealthCare matches Carestream at 12.5% visibility and 8.8 composite score, with zero citations, placing it in a cluster of mid-tier brands that appear occasionally but are never sourced. |
||||
| 6 |
infinittna.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
intelerad.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
philips.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
siemens-healthineers.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
healthcare.fujifilm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
novarad.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
ramsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
merge.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
paxerahealth.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
mach7t.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
meddream.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
aycan.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
laurelbridge.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
konicaminolta.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on radiology pacs systems, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own radiology pacs systems brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about radiology pacs systems AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in Radiology PACS systems on Google AI Mode?
Sectra leads with 50% visibility and a composite score of 35.0, well ahead of the next ranked brands Visage Imaging and GE HealthCare, both at 25%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Radiology PACS research?
The most cited sources are radiologybusiness.com, klasresearch.com, and engage.klasresearch.com, alongside reddit.com and linkedin.com, indicating a reliance on analyst reports and peer discussion forums.
Which PACS brands have citation presence despite low or zero visibility?
Intelerad is the only brand in this position, recording 12.5% citation and a composite score of 3.8 while having zero visibility in AI-generated responses.
How do major vendors like Philips and Siemens Healthineers perform in AI visibility for PACS?
Both Philips and Siemens Healthineers record 0% visibility and 0% citation, giving them a composite score of 0.0 despite their scale in the broader radiology market.
What is the average visibility across Radiology PACS brands in this audit?
The category average visibility is 6.9% and average citation is 0.6%, indicating that most brands in this category have minimal or no presence in Google AI Mode responses.
Which brands recorded the biggest visibility gains in the most recent period?
Visage Imaging and GE HealthCare both rose from 0% to 25% visibility, while Sectra grew from 37.5% to 50%, making all three the biggest risers in this audit period.