Radiology information systems: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank radiology information systems by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Radiology information systems used to manage imaging orders, workflows, reporting, scheduling, and operational coordination across radiology practices and health systems. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 15, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Philips and Siemens Healthineers share the top two positions with identical visibility scores of 12.5 percent and composite scores of 8.8, both entering the ranked set from zero in the previous period. This joint entry at the top is notable because no other brand in the top 10 records any visibility at all, creating a sharp two-tier structure. The average category visibility sits at just 1.2 percent, meaning these two brands are already running at more than ten times the category average after a single measurement period.
RamSoft presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset, recording zero percent visibility but a 25 percent citation rate, the highest citation figure across all ranked brands. MedInformatix shows a similar but weaker pattern, with zero visibility and a 12.5 percent citation rate. Philips and Siemens Healthineers show the opposite pattern, named frequently in AI responses but not cited as a source link. This means Google AI Mode is describing large vendors by name while sourcing its answers from smaller, specialist domains.
The top cited sources for this category include linkedin.com, g2.com, radsource.us, ccdcare.com, and aiopsschool.com, alongside the domains of RamSoft and MedInformatix directly. The presence of a software review platform (g2.com), a radiology education site (radsource.us), and a LinkedIn presence in the citation list indicates Google AI Mode is anchoring on third-party review and professional network content rather than vendor-owned pages when constructing answers about radiology information systems.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Philips 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #1+12pp
-
Siemens Healthineers 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
philips.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Philips leads with 12.5 percent visibility and a composite score of 8.8, more than ten times the 1.2 percent category average, but records zero citation share. |
||||
| 2 |
siemens-healthineers.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Siemens Healthineers matches Philips exactly at 12.5 percent visibility and 8.8 composite score, making these two brands the only ones with any AI visibility in the dataset. |
||||
| 3 |
ramsoft.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
RamSoft holds rank 3 with zero visibility but the highest citation rate in the category at 25 percent, meaning AI answers source its domain without naming it prominently. |
||||
| 4 |
medinformatix.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
MedInformatix records zero visibility but a 12.5 percent citation rate, placing it second among cited sources and well above the 1.9 percent category average for citations. |
||||
| 5 |
gehealthcare.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
GE HealthCare ranks fifth but records zero on both visibility and citation, giving it a composite score of 0.0 despite being a major market player. |
||||
| 6 |
sectra.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
healthcare.fujifilm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
carestream.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
intelerad.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
merge.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
novarad.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
agfa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
changehealthcare.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
mckesson.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
kmbs.konicaminolta.us
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
infinittna.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
visageimaging.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
paxerahealth.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
epic.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on radiology information systems, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own radiology information systems brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about radiology information systems AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in radiology information systems?
Philips and Siemens Healthineers share the top position, each with 12.5 percent visibility and a composite score of 8.8. Every other tracked brand records zero visibility.
Which brands are cited most by Google AI Mode in this category?
RamSoft leads all brands with a 25 percent citation rate, followed by MedInformatix at 12.5 percent. Both Philips and Siemens Healthineers record zero citations despite leading on visibility.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for radiology information systems research?
The top cited sources include linkedin.com, g2.com, radsource.us, ccdcare.com, and ramsoft.com, indicating a reliance on third-party review, professional network, and specialist education content over vendor sites.
How does category-level visibility compare to individual brand performance?
The average visibility across the category is 1.2 percent, while Philips and Siemens Healthineers each sit at 12.5 percent, more than ten times that average.
Can a brand have high citation share but low visibility in this category?
Yes. RamSoft is the clearest example, with 25 percent citation share and zero percent visibility, showing Google AI Mode links to its domain without naming it prominently in responses.
Are there any brands that have both strong visibility and strong citation in this category?
No brand in the current dataset combines both metrics. Philips and Siemens Healthineers lead on visibility with zero citations, while RamSoft and MedInformatix lead on citations with zero visibility.