Radiology information systems: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank radiology information systems by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Radiology information systems used to manage imaging orders, workflows, reporting, scheduling, and operational coordination across radiology practices and health systems. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about Radiology information systems, AI engines frequently highlight RamSoft as the leading brand. With a visibility percentage of 37.5, RamSoft is often recommended alongside Sectra and Intelerad. These brands have established a strong presence in the industry and are often cited in AI engine responses.
The rankings appear as they do primarily due to the sources AI engines rely on most, such as LinkedIn and adsc.com. These domains are known for aggregating user reviews and expert opinions. This means that brands frequently discussed or reviewed on these platforms tend to rank higher in AI-generated answers.
For a buyer exploring this list, focusing on recent reviews and third-party validation is crucial. AI engines place high value on recent and credible insights, highlighting the importance of ongoing relevance in topical authority within the Radiology information systems category. This should guide your consideration of each brand's strengths and industry influence.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
RamSoft leads the radiology information systems category with a composite score of 41.2, ahead of second-placed Sectra at 26.2. Both brands share identical visibility at 37.5%, well above the category average of 8.1%, but RamSoft's 50% citation rate versus Sectra's 0% drives the gap in composite performance. That citation advantage is significant because it signals Google AI Mode treats RamSoft as a trusted source, not just a named brand, which has real consequences for buyer influence.
The divergence between visibility and citation is the defining pattern in this category. Sectra and Epic both appear in AI responses at 37.5% and 25% respectively, yet both carry 0% citation rates. Conversely, Philips has zero visibility but a 25% citation rate, as does MedInformatix at 12.5% visibility against a 25% citation rate. This split means several brands are referenced in AI narratives without their own content being sourced, while others are cited as evidence without being named in answers.
Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all 20 brands in this audit, with no brand recording a top engine outside it. The cited source list is notably fragmented, featuring linkedin.com, sourceforge.net, and third-party sites like devopsschool.com and myhospitalnow.com alongside brand-owned domains such as ramsoft.com and medinformatix.com. The presence of comparison and community platforms in the citation set suggests AI is anchoring on aggregated review and directory content rather than vendor websites alone.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
RamSoft 0% → 38% · rank #3 → #1+38pp
-
Sectra 0% → 38% · rank #6 → #2+38pp
-
Intelerad 0% → 25% · rank #9 → #3+25pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Philips 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #8-12pp
-
Siemens Healthineers 12% → 0% · rank #2 → #9-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ramsoft.com
|
38% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
RamSoft leads with a composite score of 41.2 and a 50% citation rate, the highest in the category, against an average citation rate of 5.6%. |
||||
| 2 |
sectra.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sectra matches RamSoft on visibility at 37.5% but records 0% citations, producing a composite score of 26.2 and signalling a named-but-not-trusted dynamic. |
||||
| 3 |
intelerad.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Intelerad climbed six rank positions to third, reaching 25% visibility and a 12.5% citation rate, both above the category averages of 8.1% and 5.6%. |
||||
| 4 |
epic.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Epic holds fourth place at 25% visibility but carries a 0% citation rate, leaving its composite score at 17.5 despite strong name recognition in AI responses. |
||||
| 5 |
medinformatix.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
MedInformatix punches above its visibility rank with a 25% citation rate against only 12.5% visibility, giving it a citation-to-visibility ratio that outperforms Sectra and Epic. |
||||
| 6 |
gehealthcare.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
changehealthcare.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
philips.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
siemens-healthineers.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
healthcare.fujifilm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
carestream.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
merge.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
novarad.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
agfa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
mckesson.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
kmbs.konicaminolta.us
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
infinittna.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
visageimaging.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
paxerahealth.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on radiology information systems, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own radiology information systems brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about radiology information systems AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in radiology information systems?
RamSoft leads with a composite score of 41.2, a visibility rate of 37.5%, and a citation rate of 50%, all well above category averages.
Which brands are named in AI responses but not cited as sources?
Sectra and Epic both appear in AI responses at 37.5% and 25% visibility respectively, yet both record 0% citation rates in this audit.
Which brands are cited by AI without appearing in AI answers?
Philips records a 25% citation rate despite 0% visibility, meaning its content is used as a source even though the brand is not named in AI-generated answers.
What sources does AI cite most for radiology information systems research?
The top cited sources include linkedin.com, sourceforge.net, adsc.com, and third-party sites like devopsschool.com, alongside brand domains ramsoft.com and medinformatix.com.
Which brands have risen most in AI visibility recently?
RamSoft, Sectra, and Intelerad are the biggest risers, each moving from 0% visibility previously to 37.5%, 37.5%, and 25% respectively in the current period.
Which major brands have lost AI visibility in this category?
Philips and Siemens Healthineers both fell seven rank positions, dropping from 12.5% visibility to 0%, making them the two biggest fallers in the audit.