Top 20 push notification software by AI search visibility (2026)
Platforms used to send web and mobile push notifications, trigger lifecycle messaging, personalize campaigns, and drive retention across devices. Ranked by a composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 06, 2026At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
OneSignal and Braze share the top visibility position at 62.5% each, more than four times the category average of 15.0%. Despite identical visibility scores, a meaningful separation exists in their composite scores — 51.2 for OneSignal versus 43.8 for Braze — driven entirely by OneSignal's 25.0% citation rate against Braze's 0.0%. This gap matters because citation converts named mentions into sourced authority, suggesting AI treats OneSignal as a reference point while Braze is acknowledged but not substantiated.
The visibility-to-citation divergence is stark across this category. Of the top 10 brands, only two — OneSignal and MoEngage — receive any citations at all, at 25.0% and 12.5% respectively. Brands like Airship (37.5% visibility), WebEngage, and Firebase (both 25.0%) are named frequently in AI Overviews but carry 0.0% citation rates, meaning AI surfaces them as options without anchoring those claims to any source. The category average citation rate of 1.9% confirms this is a structurally low-citation environment.
Google AI Overviews is the dominant engine for every brand in the top 10 without exception. The top cited external sources include guideflow.com, g2.com, reddit.com, and businessofapps.com, alongside onesignal.com itself — indicating AI is drawing heavily on review aggregators and community discussion rather than vendor documentation. The presence of onesignal.com as a cited source directly likely contributes to OneSignal's citation advantage over peers who do not appear in the source list.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
OneSignal 0% → 62% · rank #0 → #1+62pp
-
Braze 0% → 62% · rank #0 → #2+62pp
-
Airship 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #3+38pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
onesignal.com
|
62% | 25% | Google AI Overviews |
OneSignal leads all brands with a 51.2 composite score, the only top-ranked brand combining peak 62.5% visibility with a non-zero 25.0% citation rate. |
||||
| 2 |
braze.com
|
62% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
Braze matches OneSignal's 62.5% visibility but holds a 0.0% citation rate, leaving its composite score 7.4 points below OneSignal's despite equal named presence. |
||||
| 3 |
airship.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
Airship reaches 37.5% visibility — 2.5x the category average — yet records 0.0% citations, making it frequently named but never sourced in AI responses. |
||||
| 4 |
webengage.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
WebEngage sits at 25.0% visibility and 0.0% citations, tying Firebase for rank 4 on composite score 17.5 but trailing all top-3 brands significantly. |
||||
| 5 |
firebase.google.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
Firebase matches WebEngage at 25.0% visibility and a 17.5 composite score despite being a Google-owned product, with no citation advantage from that affiliation. |
||||
| 6 |
moengage.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Overviews |
| 7 |
clevertap.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 8 |
leanplum.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 9 |
customer.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 10 |
wonderpush.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 11 |
expo.dev
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 12 |
batch.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 13 |
iterable.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 14 |
pushwoosh.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 15 |
notifyvisitors.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 16 |
truepush.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 17 |
kumulos.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 18 |
notificare.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 19 |
sendpulse.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
| 20 |
pusher.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Overviews |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on push notification software, these are the domains Google AI Overviews cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own push notification software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about push notification software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in push notification software?
OneSignal and Braze are tied for highest visibility at 62.5% each, but OneSignal leads overall with a composite score of 51.2 versus Braze's 43.8, due to its 25.0% citation rate.
Which push notification brands are named by AI but never cited as sources?
Braze, Airship, WebEngage, Firebase, CleverTap, Leanplum, Customer.io, and WonderPush all carry 0.0% citation rates despite appearing in AI Overviews, meaning they are mentioned without being sourced.
What sources does AI cite most for push notification software research?
The most cited sources include guideflow.com, g2.com, reddit.com, businessofapps.com, and onesignal.com itself, indicating AI anchors primarily on review platforms and community content rather than vendor sites.
Which AI engine dominates visibility for push notification software brands?
Google AI Overviews is the top engine for every brand in the top 10, with no other engine appearing as the primary visibility driver for any brand in this category.
How does the average citation rate compare to individual brand performance in this category?
The category average citation rate is just 1.9%, and only two of the top 10 brands — OneSignal at 25.0% and MoEngage at 12.5% — receive any citations at all.
Is high visibility in AI Overviews reliably paired with high citation rates in this category?
No — Braze demonstrates this disconnect most clearly, sharing OneSignal's peak 62.5% visibility while holding a 0.0% citation rate, showing named presence and sourced authority are decoupled here.