Public affairs firms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank public affairs firms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Public affairs firms helping organizations shape policy narratives, stakeholder strategy, government engagement, media pressure, and reputation in regulated environments. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jul 03, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines are asked to recommend public affairs firms, Edelman comes up most often, appearing in 12.5% of relevant AI responses across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI. FleishmanHillard and Burson follow as the next most frequently named firms. These three dominate AI-generated shortlists, meaning buyers who rely on AI research will encounter them repeatedly before finding smaller specialists.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines trust most. The top cited domains include odwyerpr.com (a long-running PR industry trade publication), clutch.co (a B2B review aggregator), and reddit.com alongside amraandelma.com and leveragewithmedia.com. Because aggregators and trade directories carry heavy weight here, firms with strong profiles on those platforms earn disproportionate AI visibility, regardless of actual client outcomes or niche expertise.
For a buyer using this list, the most important thing to understand is that AI visibility rewards third-party validation on specific platforms, not firm size or reputation alone. If you are evaluating a mid-sized firm that specializes in your sector, check whether it has a current Clutch profile with recent reviews and coverage in O'Dwyer's. Firms with that kind of footprint are more likely to appear when AI engines are asked follow-up questions about your specific industry or geography.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Edelman, FleishmanHillard, Burson, and Weber Shandwick each hold a 12.5% visibility score and a composite score of 8.8, placing them in a four-way tie at the top of the public affairs firms category. Every other brand in the audit, including FGS Global, Brunswick Group, APCO Worldwide, and Teneo, scores 0.0 across all metrics. This creates a sharp binary split: four brands account for all measurable AI visibility while the remaining 16 brands in the 20-brand set are entirely absent from Google AI Mode responses.
The most striking divergence in this data is that all four visible brands carry a citation rate of 0.0%, matching the category average of 0.0%. This means Google AI Mode names these firms in responses but does not link back to their owned domains as sources. The brands are being referenced as known entities, not as authoritative sources. This named-but-not-cited pattern suggests AI is treating these firms as factual fixtures drawn from training data rather than live, citable content.
The top cited sources in this category are third-party directories and commentary sites: odwyerpr.com, clutch.co, everything-pr.com, and reddit.com appear alongside leveragewithmedia.com, amraandelma.com, prezly.com, and the-square.co. None of these are the owned domains of the ranked brands. Google AI Mode is anchoring its sourcing on PR industry directories and aggregator content rather than on the firms themselves, which explains the zero citation rates even for the four brands with meaningful visibility scores.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Edelman 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #1+12pp
-
FleishmanHillard 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
-
Burson 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
edelman.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Edelman holds 12.5% visibility and a composite score of 8.8, matching the top tier exactly, but its citation rate of 0.0% means its domain earns no direct sourcing credit from Google AI Mode. |
||||
| 2 |
fleishmanhillard.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
FleishmanHillard shares an identical 12.5% visibility and 8.8 composite score with Edelman, offering no differentiation on any metric and a citation rate of 0.0% like every peer in this audit. |
||||
| 3 |
bursonglobal.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Burson matches the 12.5% visibility and 8.8 composite score of the two brands above it, representing a new entrant from 0.0% previously, with no citation activity recorded against its domain. |
||||
| 4 |
webershandwick.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Weber Shandwick sits at 12.5% visibility and 8.8 composite score, the lowest position within the four-way top tier, with a 0.0% citation rate identical to all other ranked brands in this category. |
||||
| 5 |
fgsglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
FGS Global scores 0.0% on visibility and 0.0 composite, placing it below the category average of 2.5% visibility and entirely absent from Google AI Mode responses in this audit period. |
||||
| 6 |
brunswickgroup.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
apcoworldwide.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
teneo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
kekstcnc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
alpinegrouppartners.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
bgrdc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
ballardpartners.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
dentonsglobaladvisors.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
mclartyassociates.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
rasky.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
mercuryllc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
sevenletter.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
publicfirst.co.uk
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
hanovercomms.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
grayling.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on public affairs firms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own public affairs firms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about public affairs firms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the public affairs firms category?
Edelman, FleishmanHillard, Burson, and Weber Shandwick each hold 12.5% visibility and a composite score of 8.8, forming a four-way tie at the top. All other tracked brands score 0.0% visibility.
What is the average AI visibility for public affairs firms?
The category average visibility is 2.5%, which reflects the fact that only 4 of the 20 tracked brands register any visibility at all, each at 12.5%.
Which public affairs firms are being cited as sources by Google AI Mode?
No public affairs firm domain is being cited. The citation rate is 0.0% across all 20 brands, including the four with visible scores.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when responding to public affairs research queries?
The top cited sources are third-party sites including odwyerpr.com, clutch.co, reddit.com, and everything-pr.com. None of the cited sources are owned domains of the ranked firms.
Is there a gap between being named in AI responses and being cited as a source in this category?
Yes. Edelman, FleishmanHillard, Burson, and Weber Shandwick are all named by Google AI Mode at 12.5% visibility, but all four have a citation rate of 0.0%, meaning their domains are not being used as sources.
Which public affairs firms saw the biggest improvement in AI visibility in this audit period?
Edelman, FleishmanHillard, and Burson are the three biggest risers, each moving from 0.0% to 12.5% visibility, a delta of 12.5 percentage points each.