Plastic surgeons in Dallas: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank plastic surgeons in dallas by visibility and citations. 22 providers measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Plastic surgeons serving Dallas patients with facial procedures, breast surgery, body contouring, reconstructive work, and cosmetic surgery expertise. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity answer questions about plastic surgeons in Dallas, Rachel Walker MD: Plastic Surgery Center Of Dallas comes up most consistently, appearing in 75% of AI-generated citations across the engines tracked here. Dr. Rod J. Rohrich and Bradley Hubbard, MD round out the top three, showing up regularly but at notably lower frequencies than Walker.
The rankings reflect what sources AI engines trust most. Google.com dominates as a citation source, meaning business profiles, reviews, and Maps presence carry real weight. The remaining top sources include practice-specific domains like cosmeticsurgerydallas.com and usaplasticsurgery.com, alongside PR distribution via prnewswire.com. Practices with strong individual web presences and consistent press coverage tend to outrank those relying on aggregator listings alone.
For buyers, the AI citation rate is a useful proxy for third-party validation. A provider cited frequently across multiple AI engines has typically accumulated recent patient reviews, maintained an authoritative web presence, and built credibility in specific procedure categories. Before booking a consultation, cross-check the AI-recommended names against current Google reviews and verify that their published work covers your specific procedure, not just general plastic surgery.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Rachel Walker MD leads the Dallas plastic surgery category with a composite score of 22.5 and a citation rate of 75.0%, far ahead of the second-ranked Dr. Rod J. Rohrich at 15.0 and 50.0%. The gap between first and second place is meaningful: Walker's citation rate is 1.5 times higher than Rohrich's and six times higher than the category average of 8.5%. Every brand in the top 10 records 0.0% visibility, which means the scoring hierarchy is driven entirely by citation differences, not named-answer appearances.
Visibility and citation are fully decoupled across this category. All 22 brands show 0.0% visibility, yet citation rates range from 75.0% at the top to 0.0% for the majority of tracked brands. This means Google AI Mode references these practices as sources without surfacing them as named answers. Ranks 6 through 10 each carry a 0.0 citation rate, creating a hard cliff below P. Craig Hobar at 12.5%, which suggests a small cluster of brands is absorbing nearly all citation activity while most tracked practices receive none.
Google AI Mode is the sole engine recorded across all 22 brands, indicating the audit captured no meaningful signal from other AI engines in this category. The top cited sources list shows google.com appearing alongside individual practice domains such as cosmeticsurgerydallas.com and drrohrich.com, but also third-party domains including usaplasticsurgery.com, prnewswire.com, and navmds.com. This pattern suggests AI is drawing on a mix of practice-owned sites and external directory or news sources rather than anchoring on any single reference type.
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
cosmeticsurgerydallas.com
|
0% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Rachel Walker MD holds a 75.0% citation rate and a composite score of 22.5, nearly 50% higher than the second-ranked brand and almost 9 times the category average citation rate of 8.5%. |
||||
| 2 |
drrohrich.com
|
0% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Dr. Rohrich sits at 50.0% citation and a composite of 15.0, placing his domain drrohrich.com among the directly cited sources list, confirming it functions as both a ranked brand and a reference source. |
||||
| 3 |
bradleyhubbardmd.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Bradley Hubbard MD and Sam Jejurikar MD share an identical citation rate of 25.0% and composite score of 7.5, placing them in a tied third position with no differentiating signal from the available data. |
||||
| 4 |
dallasplasticsurgery.pro
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Sam Jejurikar MD matches Bradley Hubbard at 25.0% citation and 7.5 composite, making these two practices statistically interchangeable at this tier based solely on the current audit figures. |
||||
| 5 |
drhobar.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
P. Craig Hobar holds a 12.5% citation rate and a composite of 3.8, sitting just above the cutoff where citation drops to zero for all remaining tracked brands in the category. |
||||
| 6 |
dryashplasticsurgery.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
drjhopkins.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
pownell.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
drnicholashaddock.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
parkcitiescosmeticsurgery.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
drweider.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
paulpinmd.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
advancedfacialplastic.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
elevatemedicalspa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
amirlakplasticsurgery.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
dauweplasticsurgery.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
drpero.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
drcocco.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
jimgilmore.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
haplasticsurgery.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 21 |
karleesmith.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 22 |
drjasonpotter.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on plastic surgeons in dallas, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own plastic surgeons in dallas brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about plastic surgeons in dallas AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the Dallas plastic surgery category?
Rachel Walker MD leads with a composite score of 22.5 and a 75.0% citation rate, which is nearly 9 times the category average of 8.5%.
Why do all brands show 0.0% visibility if some have high citation rates?
In this audit, visibility and citation are fully decoupled: Google AI Mode cites practice domains as sources but does not surface any brand as a named answer, producing 0.0% visibility across all 22 tracked brands.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Dallas plastic surgery research?
The top cited sources include google.com, cosmeticsurgerydallas.com, drrohrich.com, usaplasticsurgery.com, prnewswire.com, and navmds.com, indicating a mix of practice-owned and third-party reference domains.
How concentrated is AI citation activity in this category?
Citation is highly concentrated: the top two brands capture 75.0% and 50.0% citation rates respectively, while ranks 6 through 10 each record 0.0%, showing a sharp drop-off below the top five.
Which AI engine dominates this category's audit data?
Google AI Mode is the only engine recorded across all 22 brands, meaning no meaningful signal from other AI platforms was captured in this audit.
How does Dr. Rohrich's domain factor into the citation picture?
drrohrich.com appears both as a ranked brand at 50.0% citation and as a directly listed cited source in the category, suggesting it functions as a reference point for the AI beyond its own brand queries.