AEO for orthodontists in New York: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank orthodontists in New York by visibility and citations. 8 providers measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Orthodontic practices serving New York patients with braces, Invisalign, bite correction, pediatric orthodontics, and adult smile alignment treatments. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines are asked about orthodontists in New York, Gramercy Orthodontics leads the conversation, being mentioned in 37.5% of citations. Other notable brands include Rozenberg Dental NYC Orthodontics and Park Orthodontics, making them top choices for potential patients.
The reason Gramercy Orthodontics comes out on top in rankings is largely due to its frequent mentions on key platforms like Google, Zocdoc, and its own site, gramercyorthonyc.com. These sources, including aggregator and review sites, contribute significantly to its visibility, influencing how AI engines perceive its authority.
For buyers visiting this page, it's crucial to consider the emphasis AI engines place on recent reviews and third-party validation. Opting for a provider with strong visibility and ongoing customer feedback, like Gramercy Orthodontics, ensures you are selecting a practice recognized for its expertise and reliability in this specialized healthcare field.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Gramercy Orthodontics is the clear leader in this category, holding a composite score of 11.2 against a category average of 0.0. No other brand in the audited set scores above zero. The gap is not marginal, it is total: Gramercy is the only brand receiving any measurable AI treatment at all. Its citation rate of 37.5% means Google AI Mode references it in more than one in three relevant responses, while every other brand records zero citations and zero visibility.
All eight brands share a visibility score of 0.0, which means none of them appear in the named or described portion of AI-generated answers. Gramercy's composite score derives entirely from its citation rate, not from narrative visibility. This is a meaningful divergence: Gramercy is trusted enough to be cited as a source but not surfaced as a named recommendation in AI prose. The remaining seven brands receive neither treatment, making them effectively invisible to Google AI Mode queries.
Google AI Mode is the only engine recorded across all eight brands. The top cited sources list reveals that AI anchors heavily on aggregator and directory properties, specifically google.com, zocdoc.com, and m.yelp.com, alongside a small cluster of practice-level domains including gramercyorthonyc.com, gibbsortho.com, goodortho.com, felloworthodontist.com, and manhattanfamilyorthodontics.com. Notably, several cited domains do not appear in the ranked brand set at all, suggesting the AI draws on sources beyond the audited brands.
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
gramercyorthonyc.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Gramercy holds the only non-zero composite score (11.2) and a 37.5% citation rate, placing it entirely alone above a category floor of zero across all peers. |
||||
| 2 |
rozdental.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Rozenberg records 0.0 visibility and 0.0 citation, matching the floor shared by all other ranked brands and showing no differentiation from ranks 3 through 8. |
||||
| 3 |
parkorthonyc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Park Orthodontics sits at rank 3 with a composite score of 0.0, identical to five other brands, indicating no measurable AI presence distinguishing it from lower-ranked peers. |
||||
| 4 |
stachelorthodonticsnyc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Jennifer Stachel Orthodontics records zero on every metric, and its domain does not appear in the top cited sources list, suggesting no current AI anchor point. |
||||
| 5 |
cpnbraces.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Central Park North Orthodontics shares the 0.0 composite score with four other brands in ranks 4 through 8, with no citation or visibility data separating them. |
||||
| 6 |
ueso.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
godental365.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
hesseorthodontics.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on orthodontists in New York, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own orthodontists in New York brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for orthodontists in New York
Who leads AI visibility among orthodontists in New York?
Gramercy Orthodontics leads with a composite score of 11.2 and a 37.5% citation rate. Every other audited brand scores 0.0 on both metrics.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most when answering orthodontist queries in New York?
The most cited sources are google.com, zocdoc.com, and m.yelp.com, followed by a small set of practice-level domains including gramercyorthonyc.com and manhattanfamilyorthodontics.com.
Is any brand in this category appearing in AI-generated narrative answers?
No brand in the audited set records a visibility score above 0.0, meaning none are surfaced as named recommendations in AI prose responses.
How does Gramercy Orthodontics appear in AI responses if its visibility score is zero?
Gramercy is cited as a source link at a 37.5% rate but is not described or named in the AI-generated narrative text, which is why visibility remains 0.0 while its composite score is 11.2.
Are any brands outside the audited set being cited in this category?
Yes, domains such as gibbsortho.com, goodortho.com, felloworthodontist.com, and manhattanfamilyorthodontics.com appear in the cited sources list but are not among the eight ranked brands.
Which engine dominates AI citation activity in the New York orthodontist category?
Google AI Mode is the only engine recorded across all eight brands, making it the sole channel driving any AI-level citation or visibility in this category.