AEO for open banking platforms: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank open banking platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Platforms used to connect bank data, support account aggregation, power payments, and enable regulated open banking products. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When asking AI engines about Open banking platforms, Yapily comes out as the leader, mentioned in 25% of responses. It is frequently highlighted alongside other top brands like Plaid and TrueLayer. Yapily's visibility is driven by its strong presence in AI-generated content, reflecting its 75% citation rate by these engines.
The rankings are influenced by the sources AI engines rely on, with frequent citations from yapily.com and openbankingtracker.com. These sites are often aggregators and review platforms, lending a sense of credibility and authority to the brands they discuss. This means the listed platforms benefit from recognition not just by AI but by a broad online community.
For buyers evaluating Open banking platforms, the page should serve as a guide based on what AI engines prioritize: recent, third-party reviews and a strong online presence. Consider choosing a platform with high visibility and citation rates, reflecting sustained focus and authority in the subcategory, as these are indicators valued by AI in the decision-making process.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Yapily leads the open banking platforms category with a composite score of 40.0, ahead of Plaid at 37.5 and TrueLayer at 30.0. The gap matters because Yapily achieves this rank despite a visibility score of only 25.0 percent, well below the 37.5 percent shared by Plaid, TrueLayer, Tink, and Bud. Its lead is driven almost entirely by citation dominance at 75.0 percent, more than double Plaid's citation rate and six times TrueLayer's, suggesting Google AI Mode treats Yapily as a primary reference source rather than simply a named brand.
A clear divergence exists between named visibility and cited trust across ranks 2 to 5. Plaid, TrueLayer, Tink, and Bud all share identical visibility scores of 37.5 percent, yet their citation rates differ sharply: Plaid at 37.5 percent, TrueLayer at 12.5 percent, and Tink and Bud both at 0.0 percent. This means Tink and Bud are mentioned in AI responses as frequently as Plaid but are never used as cited sources, indicating AI treats them as contextual names rather than authoritative references.
All ten ranked brands share Google AI Mode as their top engine, confirming the audit data reflects a single-engine landscape with no Bing or Perplexity signals recorded. The top cited sources list includes third-party domains such as openbankingtracker.com, backbase.com, and gartner.com alongside brand-owned domains, indicating AI is anchoring citations on a mix of industry trackers, analyst platforms, and a small number of brand sites. Yapily.com and plaid.com are the only brand-owned domains appearing in that cited sources list.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Bud 0% → 38% · rank #18 → #5+38pp
-
Yapily 12% → 25% · rank #4 → #1+12pp
-
MX 0% → 12% · rank #8 → #7+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Plaid 75% → 38% · rank #1 → #2-38pp
-
Tink 50% → 38% · rank #2 → #4-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
yapily.com
|
25% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Yapily leads on composite score (40.0) with a citation rate of 75.0 percent, nearly triple the category average of 6.9 percent, despite visibility sitting at just 25.0 percent. |
||||
| 2 |
plaid.com
|
38% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Plaid holds 37.5 percent visibility and 37.5 percent citation rate, but dropped from rank 1 after its visibility fell 37.5 points from the previous period despite citation improving by the same margin. |
||||
| 3 |
truelayer.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
TrueLayer matches Plaid's visibility at 37.5 percent but trails sharply on citations at 12.5 percent versus Plaid's 37.5 percent, producing a composite score of 30.0 compared to Plaid's 37.5. |
||||
| 4 |
tink.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Tink shares 37.5 percent visibility with three peers but records zero citations, and its visibility declined 12.5 points from the prior period alongside a 12.5-point drop in citation rate. |
||||
| 5 |
budfinancial.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Bud is the biggest riser in the dataset, jumping 13 ranks from 18th to 5th with a 37.5-point visibility gain, but its citation rate remains at zero, keeping composite score equal to Tink at 26.2. |
||||
| 6 |
finicity.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
mx.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
nordigen.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
gocardless.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
akoya.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
trustly.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
flinks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
basiq.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
hellozai.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
aiia.eu
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
belvo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
brankas.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
railsr.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
saltedge.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
token.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on open banking platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own open banking platforms brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for open banking platforms
Who leads AI visibility in open banking platforms?
Yapily leads with a composite score of 40.0, driven by a 75.0 percent citation rate. Plaid ranks second at 37.5 composite despite higher name-level visibility.
Which brands are mentioned frequently by AI but never cited as sources?
Tink and Bud both have 37.5 percent visibility scores but 0.0 percent citation rates, meaning AI responses name them without linking to their domains as references.
What sources does AI cite most for open banking platform research?
The top cited sources include yapily.com, openbankingtracker.com, gartner.com, plaid.com, and backbase.com, combining brand-owned domains with third-party industry trackers and analyst platforms.
Which brand made the biggest move in AI visibility this period?
Bud rose 13 ranks from 18th to 5th, with visibility jumping from 0.0 to 37.5 percent. However, its citation rate did not change, remaining at 0.0 percent.
How does the category average compare to the leading brands?
The category average visibility is 10.6 percent and average citation is 6.9 percent. The top 5 brands all exceed the visibility average, but only Yapily and Plaid exceed the citation average.
Which engine dominates AI visibility data in this category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for all ten ranked brands in the dataset, with no other engine recorded as a primary driver of visibility or citations.