Mobile attribution platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank mobile attribution platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Mobile attribution platforms used to measure app installs, optimize acquisition channels, fight fraud, and connect campaign spend to in-app outcomes. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about Mobile attribution platforms, AI engines frequently name AppsFlyer as the leader. It has a significant visibility percentage of 62.5. Adjust and Branch are also often mentioned as top contenders in this category. These recognitions indicate their prominence in the industry according to AI evaluations.
The rankings are shaped by how often AI engines draw information from leading sources like cometly.com, businessofapps.com, and affise.com. These are often aggregator or review sites, which provide comprehensive analyses and comparisons. Consequently, platforms with frequent mentions and positive evaluations on these sites typically rank higher.
For buyers, the presence in AI-generated rankings underscores the importance of recent reviews and third-party validations. Whenever choosing from this list, consider brands with high topical authority and recent credible reviews, as these traits are valued by AI as indicators of quality and reliability in the mobile attribution space.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
AppsFlyer and Adjust share the top position with identical visibility scores of 62.5% and citation rates of 12.5%, both recording a composite score of 47.5. That joint lead is striking against a category average visibility of just 11.2%, meaning these two brands appear roughly five and a half times more often than the typical brand in AI-generated responses. The gap between rank 2 and rank 3 (Branch at 50.0%) is smaller than the gap between rank 3 and rank 4 (Singular at 25.0%), suggesting a clear three-brand tier at the top.
Branch presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset. Its citation rate of 25.0% is the highest in the category, yet its visibility of 50.0% trails the two leaders. Kochava sits at 25.0% visibility but records a 0.0% citation rate, meaning AI responses mention it without linking to it as a source. Airbridge and Amplitude show the inverse pattern, scoring 0.0% visibility alongside a 12.5% citation rate each, indicating AI cites their domains as reference sources even when not naming them as featured platforms.
Every brand in the dataset lists Google AI Mode as its top engine, which confirms the audit reflects a single-engine landscape with no Perplexity or Bing AI distribution splitting the signal. The top cited sources are third-party review and industry commentary sites, led by cometly.com, businessofapps.com, and affise.com. None of the top cited sources are the brand domains themselves, which means AI is anchoring its answers on independent editorial content rather than vendor-owned pages when constructing responses about this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
AppsFlyer 12% → 62% · rank #1 → #1+50pp
-
Adjust 12% → 62% · rank #2 → #2+50pp
-
Branch 0% → 50% · rank #4 → #3+50pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Tenjin 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #8-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
appsflyer.com
|
62% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
AppsFlyer holds a 62.5% visibility rate, over five times the 11.2% category average, and recorded a visibility delta of plus 50 points versus the prior period. |
||||
| 2 |
adjust.com
|
62% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Adjust matches AppsFlyer exactly on visibility (62.5%) and citation (12.5%), but its citation delta of plus 12.5 points shows it gained citation presence that AppsFlyer did not. |
||||
| 3 |
branch.io
|
50% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Branch leads all brands on citation rate at 25.0%, double the rate of AppsFlyer and Adjust, despite trailing them on visibility by 12.5 percentage points. |
||||
| 4 |
singular.net
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Singular sits at 25.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, scoring a composite of 21.2, placing it sharply below the top three but ahead of Kochava on both metrics. |
||||
| 5 |
kochava.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Kochava reaches 25.0% visibility but records a 0.0% citation rate, the only top-five brand with zero citations, giving it the lowest composite score (17.5) in the tier. |
||||
| 6 |
airbridge.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
amplitude.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
tenjin.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
firebase.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
mixpanel.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
braze.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
clevertap.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
moengage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
useinsider.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
remerge.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
liftoff.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
unity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
appmetrica.yandex.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
adobe.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
mparticle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on mobile attribution platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own mobile attribution platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about mobile attribution platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in mobile attribution platforms?
AppsFlyer and Adjust are joint leaders, both at 62.5% visibility and 12.5% citation with composite scores of 47.5. No other brand comes close to matching that combined score.
Which brand gets cited most often by AI in this category?
Branch records the highest citation rate at 25.0%, which is double the rate of AppsFlyer and Adjust, even though its overall visibility of 50.0% is lower than theirs.
What sources does AI cite most for mobile attribution research?
The top cited sources are third-party sites including cometly.com, businessofapps.com, affise.com, and hockeystack.com. None of the vendor domains appear in the top cited sources list.
How large is the gap between top brands and the category average?
The category average visibility is 11.2%, while AppsFlyer and Adjust sit at 62.5%, meaning the top two brands appear at roughly five and a half times the average rate.
Are any brands cited by AI without being named as featured platforms?
Yes, Airbridge and Amplitude both record 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation each, indicating AI references their domains as sources without featuring them as named platforms in responses.
Which brands saw the biggest visibility changes in the latest audit period?
AppsFlyer, Adjust, and Branch each recorded a visibility delta of plus 50 percentage points, while Tenjin fell five rank positions and dropped from 12.5% to 0.0% visibility.