Mobile app attribution platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank mobile app attribution platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Mobile attribution platforms used to measure acquisition sources, campaign effectiveness, user journeys, and lifetime value across app growth channels. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When evaluating Mobile app attribution platforms, buyers frequently hear about Adjust, known for its 75% visibility among AI engines. Other prominent brands often mentioned include Branch and AppsFlyer, signaling their strong presence in the industry. Adjust leads with its impressive citation rate of 25%, indicating a top choice for those prioritizing industry leadership.
The rankings reflect data predominantly pulled from domains like cometly.com, businessofapps.com, and airbridge.io. These sources, often aggregator and review sites, significantly impact how brands are perceived. This suggests that user-generated feedback and comparative analysis heavily influence the visibility of top brands, providing a broad perspective across the industry.
For buyers, this compilation underscores the importance of considering factors valued by AI engines, such as recent reviews and third-party validation, when choosing a platform. Prioritizing brands with strong topical authority and comprehensive user feedback on specific subcategories ensures a more informed decision aligned with current industry standards.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Adjust leads the category with a composite score of 60.0, having risen from rank 20 to rank 1 in the current period, a visibility jump of 75 percentage points. AppsFlyer matches Adjust on raw visibility at 75.0% but scores lower overall at 56.2, held back by a citation rate of just 12.5%. The gap between first and fourth place (Tenjin, 33.8) is substantial, meaning the top three brands are capturing a disproportionate share of AI-generated answers compared to the remaining 17 brands in the category.
A clear divergence exists between being named and being cited. AppsFlyer appears in 75.0% of responses but is cited in only 12.5%, while Branch is named less often (62.5%) yet cited in 50.0% of responses. Airbridge shows the sharpest version of this split, with just 12.5% visibility against a 37.5% citation rate, suggesting AI answers reference its domain as a source even when not describing it as a primary platform. Branch Performance, sharing the branch.io domain, records 0.0% visibility alongside a 50.0% citation rate, reinforcing this pattern.
Every brand in the top 10 lists Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming this audit is anchored entirely on that single engine. The top cited sources include third-party domains such as cometly.com, businessofapps.com, improvado.io, and splitmetrics.com alongside brand-owned domains like airbridge.io and branch.io. This indicates Google AI Mode is pulling category context from industry comparison and review sites rather than relying solely on vendor-owned content when constructing attribution-related answers.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Adjust 0% → 75% · rank #20 → #1+75pp
-
AppsFlyer 0% → 75% · rank #7 → #3+75pp
-
Branch 0% → 62% · rank #6 → #2+62pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
adjust.com
|
75% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Adjust leads all brands with a 75.0% visibility score and a composite of 60.0, more than 61 points above the category average visibility of 13.8%. |
||||
| 2 |
branch.io
|
62% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Branch has the highest citation rate among named platforms at 50.0%, double its closest rival Adjust, despite trailing Adjust on composite score by 1.2 points. |
||||
| 3 |
appsflyer.com
|
75% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
AppsFlyer matches Adjust on visibility at 75.0% but its citation rate of 12.5% is the lowest in the top three, pulling its composite score to 56.2. |
||||
| 4 |
tenjin.com
|
38% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Tenjin sits at rank 4 with a composite of 33.8, roughly half that of AppsFlyer, and its 37.5% visibility is still nearly three times the category average. |
||||
| 5 |
airbridge.io
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Airbridge records just 12.5% visibility yet a 37.5% citation rate, the clearest example in the data of a brand being cited as a source more than it is described as a solution. |
||||
| 6 |
branch.io
|
0% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
singular.net
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
adjust.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
appsflyer.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
mixpanel.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
leanplum.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
useinsider.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
kochava.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
revenuecat.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
amplitude.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
firebase.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
clevertap.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
data.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
braze.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
moengage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on mobile app attribution platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own mobile app attribution platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about mobile app attribution platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in mobile app attribution platforms?
Adjust leads with a composite score of 60.0 and a visibility rate of 75.0%, having risen from rank 20 to rank 1 in the current period. AppsFlyer shares the same 75.0% visibility figure but scores lower overall due to a citation rate of only 12.5%.
Which brand is cited most often by Google AI Mode in this category?
Branch and Branch Performance both record a 50.0% citation rate, the highest in the dataset. Branch achieves this alongside 62.5% visibility, while Branch Performance is cited at that same rate despite 0.0% visibility.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when answering mobile app attribution queries?
The top cited sources include third-party sites such as cometly.com, businessofapps.com, improvado.io, and splitmetrics.com, alongside brand-owned domains airbridge.io and branch.io. This mix suggests the AI draws on industry comparison content as much as vendor pages.
How large is the visibility gap between the top brands and the rest of the category?
The category average visibility is 13.8%, while the top two brands both sit at 75.0% visibility, meaning they are appearing in roughly five times as many AI responses as the average brand. Six of the top 10 brands record 0.0% to 12.5% visibility.
Which brands show the biggest divergence between being named and being cited?
Airbridge is the clearest case, with a 12.5% visibility rate but a 37.5% citation rate. AppsFlyer shows the inverse pattern, named in 75.0% of responses but cited in only 12.5%.
Which attribution platforms rose most sharply in AI visibility recently?
Adjust rose from rank 20 to rank 1 with a visibility delta of 75.0 percentage points, the largest single jump in the dataset. AppsFlyer and Branch also moved from near-zero visibility to 75.0% and 62.5% respectively in the same period.