AEO for med spas in Seattle: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank med spas in Seattle by visibility and citations. 14 providers measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Medical spas serving Seattle clients with injectables, laser treatments, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and advanced aesthetic skincare services. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When asking AI engines about med spas in Seattle, buyers often hear about Glow Medispa as the top choice, securing a leader visibility of 37.5 percent. Skinlogic Med Spa and Blue Haven Medical Spa also frequently appear in these discussions, showcasing their strong presence in the market.
The rankings are heavily influenced by sources such as google.com, skinlogicmedspa.com, and glowspaseattle.com. These platforms, including review aggregators like vagaro.com and m.yelp.com, drive citations by providing comprehensive insights into user experiences and service quality.
For buyers, this means prioritizing med spas with recent reviews and third-party validation is crucial. AI engines value these factors along with a provider's topical authority in specific subcategories, helping you find trustworthy options for your needs.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Glow Medispa dominates this category with a visibility score of 37.5%, more than six times the category average of 6.2%, and a composite score of 45.0 against the next closest brand at 23.8. That gap is material because nine of the fourteen tracked brands score zero visibility, meaning AI responses in this category are effectively concentrated in one or two names. Glow Medispa also grew visibility by 12.5 points from its previous reading, reinforcing rather than softening that lead.
Skinlogic Med Spa presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation authority. Its citation rate of 50.0% is only 12.5 points behind Glow Medispa despite a visibility score of 12.5%, which is one-third of Glow Medispa's. Skin Synthesis shows the opposite pattern, earning 12.5% visibility with a citation rate of exactly 0.0%, meaning it appears in AI responses but is not being linked or sourced. Blue Haven Medical Spa and Bellora Medical Aesthetics are symmetric at 12.5% on both metrics, suggesting limited but consistent treatment.
All ten ranked brands share Google AI Mode as their top engine, indicating the audit data reflects a single-engine landscape with no cross-engine variation to analyse. Among the top cited sources, third-party platforms including vagaro.com, m.yelp.com, dashboard.boulevard.io, and medicalspalocator.com appear alongside brand domains. The presence of these booking and directory platforms in the citation list suggests Google AI Mode is pulling structured listing data as well as direct brand content when constructing responses for this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Glow Medispa 25% → 38% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
-
Skin Synthesis 0% → 12% · rank #5 → #5+12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
glowspaseattle.com
|
38% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Glow Medispa leads all 14 brands with 37.5% visibility and 62.5% citation rate, both figures standing well above every competitor and the category averages of 6.2% and 9.8%. |
||||
| 2 |
skinlogicmedspa.com
|
12% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Skinlogic Med Spa achieves a citation rate of 50.0% on only 12.5% visibility, meaning AI trusts it as a source far more often than it mentions it unprompted. |
||||
| 3 |
bluehavenmedicalspa.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Blue Haven Medical Spa sits at 12.5% on both visibility and citation, matching rank-4 Bellora exactly and offering no differentiation signal between the two brands in AI responses. |
||||
| 4 |
belloramedicalaesthetics.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Bellora Medical Aesthetics mirrors Blue Haven's identical 12.5% visibility and 12.5% citation scores, placing both brands at a composite of 12.5 with no measurable advantage over each other. |
||||
| 5 |
skinsynthesis.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Skin Synthesis grew from 0% to 12.5% visibility in the latest period but holds a 0.0% citation rate, suggesting AI mentions it without treating its domain as a citable source. |
||||
| 6 |
elementmedicalspa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
medspaofseattle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
swedishspa.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
simplicitymedspa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
seattleaesthetics.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
skinmdseattle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
seattleaestheticinjector.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
maintenancebar.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
numeaesthetics.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on med spas in Seattle, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own med spas in Seattle brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for med spas in Seattle
Who leads AI visibility in Med spas in Seattle?
Glow Medispa leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 45.0, more than six times the category average of 6.2% and nearly double the score of the second-ranked brand, Skinlogic Med Spa at 23.8.
What sources does AI cite most for Med spas in Seattle research?
Google AI Mode cites a mix of brand domains (glowspaseattle.com, skinlogicmedspa.com) and third-party platforms including vagaro.com, m.yelp.com, dashboard.boulevard.io, and medicalspalocator.com.
How concentrated is AI visibility across brands in this category?
Visibility is highly concentrated: nine of fourteen tracked brands score 0.0% visibility, and the top brand alone accounts for 37.5% against a category average of just 6.2%.
Which brand shows the biggest gap between being mentioned and being cited?
Skin Synthesis appears in AI responses with 12.5% visibility but has a 0.0% citation rate, while Skinlogic Med Spa shows the reverse with a 50.0% citation rate on only 12.5% visibility.
Which brands gained AI visibility in the most recent period?
Glow Medispa grew visibility by 12.5 points (from 25.0% to 37.5%) and Skin Synthesis entered the visible set entirely, rising from 0.0% to 12.5%, making them the only two risers in the audit data.
Does AI visibility in this category vary across search engines?
The audit data shows all ten ranked brands share Google AI Mode as their sole top engine, with no cross-engine variation recorded in this dataset.