Marketing resource management software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank marketing resource management software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Marketing resource management software used to plan campaigns, manage creative workflows, control brand assets, and coordinate distributed marketing teams. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 12, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Aprimo leads the marketing resource management software category with a visibility score of 25.0%, a figure ten times the category average of 2.5%. Monday.com and ClickUp share second place at 12.5% each, meaning the top three brands account for all meaningful visibility in the category. The gap between Aprimo and the remaining 17 brands is stark, with every brand from rank four downward holding either zero or near-zero composite scores, making this a heavily concentrated visibility landscape.
A notable divergence exists between visibility and citation across this category. Aprimo holds the highest visibility at 25.0% but carries a 0.0% citation rate, meaning AI Mode names it without anchoring to its own domain as a source. Sitecore is the only brand with any citation presence (12.5%) despite zero visibility, suggesting AI is drawing on third-party references to Sitecore without surfacing it as a named recommendation. The category average citation rate of just 0.6% confirms that being named and being cited are largely disconnected here.
Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all 20 brands in this audit, with no other engine registering as a top performer for any brand. The top cited sources include g2.com, gartner.com, and trustradius.com, which are review and analyst platforms, alongside less prominent domains like workwithopal.com, soku.ai, and keends.com. This pattern suggests AI Mode is drawing on third-party review and comparison content rather than brand-owned assets when constructing answers in this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Aprimo 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1+25pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
monday.com 38% → 12% · rank #0 → #2-25pp
-
Wrike 25% → 0% · rank #0 → #9-25pp
-
ClickUp 25% → 12% · rank #0 → #3-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
aprimo.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Aprimo leads with 25.0% visibility, ten times the category average, but holds a 0.0% citation rate, meaning AI names it without linking to its domain. |
||||
| 2 |
monday.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Monday.com sits at 12.5% visibility but fell sharply from a prior 37.5%, making it the category's biggest visibility faller alongside Wrike in absolute terms. |
||||
| 3 |
clickup.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
ClickUp matches monday.com at 12.5% visibility but dropped from 25.0% previously, sharing the same 8.8 composite score and 0.0% citation rate as its peer. |
||||
| 4 |
sitecore.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Sitecore is the category's only brand with citation presence (12.5%) despite zero visibility, an unusual split that no other brand in the top five replicates. |
||||
| 5 |
bynder.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Bynder holds rank five but scores zero across visibility, citation, and composite, meaning it has no measurable presence in Google AI Mode responses for this category. |
||||
| 6 |
welcome.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
brandmaker.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
asana.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
wrike.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
adobe.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
coschedule.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
lytho.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
intelligencebank.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
brandfolder.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
adobe.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
canto.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
smartsheet.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
acquia.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
filestage.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
optimizely.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on marketing resource management software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own marketing resource management software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about marketing resource management software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in marketing resource management software?
Aprimo leads with a visibility score of 25.0%, which is ten times the category average of 2.5%. Monday.com and ClickUp follow jointly at 12.5% each.
Which brand is cited most by AI in this category even if not highly visible?
Sitecore holds the only non-zero citation rate in the top ten at 12.5%, despite recording 0.0% visibility, making it the sole brand cited without being named as a top recommendation.
What sources does AI cite most for marketing resource management software research?
The top cited sources include g2.com, gartner.com, and trustradius.com alongside smaller domains such as workwithopal.com and soku.ai, indicating a reliance on third-party review and comparison content.
Which brands have lost the most AI visibility recently in this category?
Monday.com dropped 25.0 percentage points from 37.5% to 12.5%, and Wrike fell 25.0 points from 25.0% to 0.0%, making them the two largest fallers in the audit period.
How concentrated is AI visibility across marketing resource management software brands?
The top three brands (Aprimo, monday.com, ClickUp) hold all meaningful visibility, while the remaining 17 brands in the audit each score 0.0% visibility.
Which AI engine dominates coverage of marketing resource management software?
Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for every brand in this audit, with no other engine recorded as a leading source for any of the 20 brands tracked.