Location intelligence software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank location intelligence software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Location intelligence platforms used to analyze geospatial data, map audiences, study foot traffic, and improve site, territory, or expansion decisions. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask AI engines about Location intelligence software, HERE emerges as the leader with a visibility percentage of 37.5. Esri and Mapbox also appear frequently among the top brands in this category. These brands gain attention due to their comprehensive tools and solutions in the analytics space, making them popular choices for businesses seeking advanced location insights.
The rankings reflect data gathered from domains frequently cited by AI engines. Sources such as growthfactor.ai and smappen.com provide robust information on this category, with some being aggregator or review sites. This means the rankings are influenced by the visibility and review quality these sites offer, impacting how AI engines perceive and present brand authority.
For buyers evaluating location intelligence software brands on this page, consider what AI engines value: the number and quality of recent reviews, third-party validation, and topical authority on this subcategory. These elements matter when choosing a brand, as they reflect how well each software has been received and endorsed by industry experts and users alike.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
HERE leads the location intelligence software category with a 37.5% visibility score, more than 12 points ahead of Esri and Mapbox, both at 25.0%. That gap is significant because HERE holds rank 1 despite a 50-point visibility drop from its previous 87.5%, indicating a sharp contraction rather than a stable lead. The category average visibility sits at just 6.2%, meaning the top three brands account for nearly all of the AI-generated surface area across the tracked queries.
The visibility-to-citation divergence is pronounced here. HERE appears in AI responses frequently but carries a 0.0% citation rate, meaning it is named but its domain is not linked or sourced. Esri is the only top-three brand where visibility and citation are aligned at 25.0% each, suggesting AI treats it as both a recognized and trusted reference. Brands like Precisely, Unacast, Targomo, and Buxton achieve citation rates of 12.5% each with zero visibility, meaning they appear as sources but are not described as category players.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the audit is entirely concentrated on that single surface. The top cited sources in the category are third-party sites including g2.com, growthfactor.ai, and caliper.com, none of which are the primary brand domains of the leading vendors. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode anchors its category descriptions on review and directory content rather than on the vendors' own documentation or product pages.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Mapbox 0% → 25% · rank #10 → #3+25pp
-
Geoblink 0% → 12% · rank #12 → #6+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
HERE 88% → 38% · rank #1 → #1-50pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
here.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
HERE leads with 37.5% visibility, six times the 6.2% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate means it is named without being sourced, and its visibility fell 50 points from the prior period. |
||||
| 2 |
esri.com
|
25% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Esri is the only top-five brand where visibility and citation are equal at 25.0%, making it the most balanced presence and the only vendor AI appears to both describe and reference as a source. |
||||
| 3 |
mapbox.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Mapbox jumped from rank 10 to rank 3 with a 25-point visibility gain, but its citation rate remains 0.0%, suggesting rapid AI name recognition without any corresponding sourcing trust. |
||||
| 4 |
carto.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
CARTO holds rank 4 with matching visibility and citation rates of 12.5% each, a proportional profile similar to Esri but at roughly half the score of the top two brands. |
||||
| 5 |
placer.ai
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Placer.ai shares rank 5 with Geoblink at 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation, putting it above the 6.2% category average for visibility but with no sourcing presence in AI responses. |
||||
| 6 |
geoblink.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
precisely.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
unacast.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
targomo.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
buxtonco.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
near.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
safegraph.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
foursquare.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
gapmaps.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
nextbillion.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
loqate.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
orbitalinsight.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
galigeo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
deweydata.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
spatial.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on location intelligence software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own location intelligence software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about location intelligence software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in location intelligence software?
HERE leads with 37.5% visibility, ahead of Esri and Mapbox at 25.0% each. The category average is just 6.2%, so the top three brands dominate almost all AI-generated mentions.
Which location intelligence brand is most cited as a source by AI?
Esri has the highest citation rate among top brands at 25.0%. Precisely, Unacast, Targomo, and Buxton each carry 12.5% citation rates despite having zero visibility, meaning they appear as background sources only.
What sources does AI cite most for location intelligence software research?
The top cited sources include g2.com, growthfactor.ai, caliper.com, and smappen.com. None of these are the primary domains of the leading vendors, indicating AI relies on third-party review and directory sites for this category.
Which brands have the biggest disconnect between visibility and citation in this category?
HERE and Mapbox both have 0.0% citation rates despite visibility scores of 37.5% and 25.0% respectively, the largest visibility-to-citation gaps in the dataset.
Which brand showed the biggest recent movement in AI visibility?
Mapbox rose from rank 10 to rank 3, gaining 25 visibility points from a previous score of 0.0%. Geoblink also moved from rank 12 to rank 6 with a 12.5-point gain.
Has the overall AI visibility for the top brand in this category been stable?
No. HERE remains rank 1 but its visibility dropped 50 points, from 87.5% to 37.5%, making it the biggest faller in absolute terms despite holding the top position.