LinkedIn marketing agencies: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank linkedin marketing agencies by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. LinkedIn marketing agencies helping B2B teams run paid social, founder-led content, prospecting, retargeting, and pipeline generation on LinkedIn. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jul 05, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity answer questions about LinkedIn marketing agencies, Impactable comes up most often, appearing in 25% of all AI responses and earning citations in 37.5% of relevant answers. B2Linked and Gripped round out the top three. Across 20 ranked brands, that gap between Impactable and the rest is meaningful enough to treat it as the current consensus pick among AI-recommended options.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines trust most when forming answers. The top cited domains include salesbread.com, outreachbloom.com, and promiseclick.com alongside impactable.com and linkedin.com itself. Several of those are aggregator or roundup sites that publish ranked lists of LinkedIn agencies, which means brands appearing consistently across those lists get amplified in AI outputs. A strong presence on third-party review and listicle sites drives visibility here more than any single brand-owned property.
For a buyer using this page, the most practical signal is third-party validation. Brands that rank well here appear repeatedly across independent sources, not just their own websites. When evaluating any agency on this list, check whether their recent client reviews and case studies show up on external sites, not just their own. AI engines weight that kind of distributed, corroborated evidence, and it often reflects real-world credibility in the subcategory.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Impactable leads the LinkedIn marketing agencies category with a composite score of 28.8, compared to a category average of just 2.5 for both visibility and citation. B2Linked shares the same 25.0 visibility percentage but scores only 17.5 composite, making the gap between first and second place meaningful despite identical raw visibility. The remaining 18 brands in the dataset register zero visibility, confirming that AI recognition in this category is concentrated in an extremely small number of players.
The divergence between visibility and citation is most stark with B2Linked, which holds 25.0 percent visibility but a 0.0 citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode names it but does not link back to it as a trusted source. Impactable, by contrast, pairs 25.0 percent visibility with a 37.5 percent citation rate, making it the only brand that is both named and actively cited. Gripped presents the inverse pattern, scoring 0.0 visibility but 12.5 citation, suggesting it earns source-level trust without appearing in direct brand mentions.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, indicating no meaningful differentiation by engine across this category. The top cited sources list is dominated by third-party and niche domains such as salesbread.com, outreachbloom.com, theb2bplaybook.com, and linkedist.com, alongside impactable.com and linkedin.com itself. This pattern suggests the AI is anchoring its answers on specialist roundup and review content rather than the agencies' own domains, except in Impactable's case.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Impactable 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1+25pp
-
B2Linked 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
impactable.com
|
25% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Impactable is the only brand above the 2.5 percent category average for both metrics, with 25.0 percent visibility and a category-high 37.5 percent citation rate. |
||||
| 2 |
b2linked.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
B2Linked matches Impactable on visibility at 25.0 percent but records a 0.0 citation rate, producing a composite score of 17.5 versus Impactable's 28.8. |
||||
| 3 |
gripped.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Gripped achieves a 12.5 percent citation rate despite zero visibility, giving it a composite score of 3.8 and a citation-only presence no other zero-visibility brand matches. |
||||
| 4 |
cleverly.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cleverly registers 0.0 across visibility, citation, and composite score, placing it among the majority of brands that have no measurable AI presence in this category. |
||||
| 5 |
directiveconsulting.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Directive also scores 0.0 on all three metrics, sharing rank 5 with several peers and sitting entirely below the already low 2.5 percent category average. |
||||
| 6 |
singlegrain.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
nogood.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
skale.so
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
growthrhino.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
wearesculpt.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
justglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
tiltmetrics.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
metadata.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
hawksem.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
npdigital.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
powerdigitalmarketing.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
tuffgrowth.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
velocitypartners.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
amsive.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
refinelabs.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on linkedin marketing agencies, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own linkedin marketing agencies brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about linkedin marketing agencies AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the LinkedIn marketing agencies category?
Impactable leads with a composite score of 28.8, a visibility rate of 25.0 percent, and a citation rate of 37.5 percent, placing it well above the category average of 2.5 percent for both metrics.
How concentrated is AI visibility across LinkedIn marketing agencies?
Only two of the 20 audited brands, Impactable and B2Linked, register any visibility at all, and only three including Gripped record any citation activity, making this one of the most concentrated categories in the dataset.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for LinkedIn marketing agency research?
The most cited sources include third-party and niche domains such as salesbread.com, outreachbloom.com, theb2bplaybook.com, and linkedist.com, alongside impactable.com and linkedin.com, suggesting the AI relies heavily on roundup and review content.
Can a brand be cited by Google AI Mode without appearing in its named brand mentions?
Yes. Gripped records a 12.5 percent citation rate with 0.0 percent visibility, indicating Google AI Mode links to its domain as a source without naming it as a brand recommendation.
Is there a meaningful difference between being named and being cited in this category?
The B2Linked case illustrates the gap clearly: it matches Impactable on 25.0 percent visibility but holds a 0.0 citation rate, meaning it is named but not linked, which reduces its composite score from a potential 28.8 to 17.5.
Which AI engine dominates citation and visibility for LinkedIn marketing agencies?
Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for every brand in the audit, with no other engine producing measurable results for any brand in this category.