Last-mile delivery software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank last-mile delivery software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Last-mile delivery platforms used to dispatch drivers, optimize routes, provide live tracking, and orchestrate final-mile delivery operations. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 14, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Shipday leads the last-mile delivery software category with a visibility score of 37.5%, nearly 4.6 times the category average of 8.1%. That gap is significant because Onfleet, Bringg, and Tive all sit at 25.0% and share identical composite scores of 17.5, meaning Shipday holds a clear and uncontested top position rather than leading a tight cluster. The distance between first and fifth place (Routific at 12.5%) reinforces how concentrated AI visibility is at the very top of this category.
A notable divergence exists between being named by the AI and being cited by it. Onfleet, Bringg, and Tive each carry 25.0% visibility but 0.0% citation, showing Google AI Mode mentions them without linking back to their domains. Shipday is the only brand combining meaningful visibility (37.5%) with any citation rate (12.5%). Meanwhile DispatchTrack and Locus show the inverse pattern, appearing at 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation each, suggesting the AI references their content without naming them as category recommendations.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the category's AI visibility landscape is currently a single-engine story. The cited sources include review and analyst platforms such as g2.com and gartner.com alongside niche logistics content sites including onro.io, wodely.com, and cigotracker.com. YouTube also appears in the top cited sources, suggesting video content plays a role in shaping which claims the AI chooses to substantiate in this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Shipday 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1+38pp
-
Onfleet 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Bringg 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
shipday.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Shipday leads all 20 tracked brands with 37.5% visibility and the only non-zero citation rate (12.5%) in the top five, giving it a composite score of 30.0. |
||||
| 2 |
onfleet.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Onfleet matches Bringg and Tive at 25.0% visibility and a composite of 17.5, but carries 0.0% citation, meaning it is named by AI without receiving any source links. |
||||
| 3 |
bringg.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Bringg shares rank 3 with identical scores to Onfleet (25.0% visibility, 0.0% citation, composite 17.5), offering no differentiating signal in current AI output. |
||||
| 4 |
tive.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Tive sits at 25.0% visibility with 0.0% citation and a composite of 17.5, statistically indistinguishable from Onfleet and Bringg across all three metrics in this audit. |
||||
| 5 |
routific.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Routific drops sharply to 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation (composite 8.8), placing it roughly 3 times below the top three and only slightly above the 8.1% category average. |
||||
| 6 |
optimoroute.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
fareye.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
track-pod.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
dispatchtrack.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
locus.sh
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
getcircuit.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
jungleworks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
loginextsolutions.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
route4me.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
shipsy.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
eliteextra.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
parcelperform.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
roadwarrior.app
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
dropon.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
gometroapp.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on last-mile delivery software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own last-mile delivery software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about last-mile delivery software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in last-mile delivery software?
Shipday leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 30.0, well ahead of the next tier (Onfleet, Bringg, Tive) which all sit at 25.0%.
What is the average AI visibility for brands in this category?
The category average visibility is 8.1% and the average citation rate is 1.9%, indicating most of the 20 tracked brands have very limited presence in AI-generated responses.
Which brands are cited by AI but not prominently named in last-mile delivery software?
DispatchTrack and Locus each carry 12.5% citation but 0.0% visibility, meaning AI pulls from their content as a source without recommending them as category solutions.
What sources does AI cite most when answering questions about last-mile delivery software?
The top cited sources include youtube.com, g2.com, gartner.com, and niche logistics sites such as onro.io, wodely.com, and cigotracker.com.
Which AI engine dominates visibility for last-mile delivery software brands?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, making it the only channel that currently drives measurable AI visibility in this category.
Are there brands with high visibility but zero citations in this category?
Yes, Onfleet, Bringg, and Tive all have 25.0% visibility but 0.0% citation, showing Google AI Mode names them without linking to their domains as supporting sources.