IT asset disposition services: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank it asset disposition services by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. IT asset disposition service providers helping enterprises retire hardware securely with data destruction, remarketing, recycling, and compliance controls. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jul 01, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask AI engines about IT asset disposition services, ERI comes up most often, appearing in 25% of AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI. Iron Mountain and Securis round out the top three. That means if a prospect is using AI to shortlist vendors before reaching out, ERI has a meaningful head start in getting considered.
The sources AI engines cite most when answering ITAD questions include gartner.com and a mix of vendor and aggregator sites such as reconext.com, unduit.com, and greenteksolutionsllc.com. Gartner carries obvious weight as a third-party analyst, but the presence of vendor-adjacent sites suggests AI engines are pulling from wherever structured, topically focused content exists. Brands that publish detailed, credible content about ITAD processes, certifications, and compliance tend to get picked up more consistently.
For a buyer using this page to shortlist providers, the rankings reflect which brands have earned third-party validation and topical authority online, not just marketing spend. Before finalizing a shortlist, check whether a provider has recent reviews on recognized platforms and whether their published content covers your specific concerns, such as data destruction standards, R2 or e-Stewards certification, or chain-of-custody reporting. That is also what AI engines are weighting when they generate their answers.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
ERI leads the IT asset disposition category with a visibility score of 25.0%, more than double the 12.5% held by second-ranked Iron Mountain and Securis. The category average visibility sits at just 3.1%, making ERI's position a significant outlier. Despite this, ERI holds a 0.0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode names the brand frequently but does not anchor responses to its domain as a source. This gap between being named and being trusted as a reference point is the defining tension at the top of this category.
Iron Mountain and Securis both sit at 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation, giving them identical composite scores of 16.2 against ERI's 17.5. CXtec and Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations present the inverse pattern, with 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation each, meaning the AI cites their content without surfacing them in named brand responses. This divergence between citation and visibility suggests Google AI Mode draws on these brands as background sources while reserving named mentions for a narrower shortlist.
Every brand in the top 10 has Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming this is a Google-dominated visibility landscape with no Perplexity or ChatGPT signals apparent in the data. The top cited sources include reconext.com, gartner.com, and ironmountain.com, alongside less prominent domains such as unduit.com and greenteksolutionsllc.com. Gartner's presence as a cited source indicates the AI is anchoring some category-level framing on analyst content rather than vendor sites alone.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
ERI 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1+25pp
-
Iron Mountain 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
-
Securis 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
eridirect.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
ERI leads with 25.0% visibility, eight times the 3.1% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate means it is named without being used as a sourced reference. |
||||
| 2 |
ironmountain.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Iron Mountain matches Securis exactly at 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation, and its domain appears directly in the top cited sources list, reinforcing its dual named-and-cited standing. |
||||
| 3 |
securis.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Securis achieves the same composite score as Iron Mountain (16.2) with identical visibility and citation figures, making it the closest peer competitor in the category by every measured metric. |
||||
| 4 |
simslifecycle.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sims Lifecycle Services holds 12.5% visibility but 0.0% citation, mirroring ERI's pattern at a lower scale and scoring a composite of 8.8, half that of Iron Mountain. |
||||
| 5 |
cxtec.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
CXtec registers 0.0% visibility yet earns 12.5% citation, placing it among brands whose content informs AI responses without the brand itself being surfaced in named recommendations. |
||||
| 6 |
thinkdynamic.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
ingrammicro.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
hobi.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
tes-amm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
aptosolutions.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
redemtech.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
cloudblue.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
techreset.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
pcdisposal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
atlantixglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
exittechnologies.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
wisetek.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
dell.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
hp.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
logisnextamericas.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on it asset disposition services, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own it asset disposition services brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about it asset disposition services AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in IT asset disposition services?
ERI leads with 25.0% visibility, more than double the next-ranked brands. However, its 0.0% citation rate means it is named in responses but not used as a cited source.
Which brands are both named and cited by Google AI Mode in this category?
Iron Mountain and Securis are the only brands achieving both meaningful visibility (12.5% each) and citation (25.0% each), giving them the strongest combined presence in the data.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for IT asset disposition research?
The top cited sources include reconext.com, gartner.com, ironmountain.com, linkedin.com, and several smaller specialist domains such as unduit.com and greenteksolutionsllc.com.
How does the category average compare to the top brands?
The category average visibility is 3.1% and average citation is 3.8%, meaning ERI at 25.0% visibility is roughly eight times above average and Iron Mountain at 25.0% citation is more than six times above average.
Are there brands that are cited but not visible in AI-generated responses?
Yes, CXtec and Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations both have 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation each, indicating their content is used as background reference without those brands being surfaced in named responses.
Which AI engine dominates visibility for this category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the top 10, with no other engine appearing in the data, making this a Google-only visibility story for IT asset disposition at present.