IT asset disposition companies: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank it asset disposition companies by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. IT asset disposition companies helping enterprises decommission hardware, securely erase data, remarket equipment, and manage electronics recycling and compliance. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jul 05, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini answer questions about IT asset disposition companies, ERI comes up most often, appearing in 50% of AI-generated responses across the engines tracked. Iron Mountain and Sims Lifecycle Services round out the top three. That level of visibility puts ERI meaningfully ahead of the other 17 brands ranked on this page.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines cite most when building their answers. The top cited domains include goworkwize.com, reconext.com, gartner.com, unduit.com, and reworxrecycling.org. Gartner functions as an analyst and review platform, while the others are aggregators, vendor comparison sites, or industry-specific directories. Brands that appear consistently across these third-party sources earn higher AI visibility than brands relying only on their own website content.
For a buyer using this page, the practical takeaway is that AI visibility correlates with third-party validation, not just brand size or marketing spend. When evaluating a provider, check whether they appear in review platforms like Gartner and aggregator sites covering ITAD specifically. A brand with strong recent reviews and citations across multiple independent sources is more likely to surface in the AI answers your own team or colleagues are already consulting.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
ERI leads the IT asset disposition category with a visibility score of 50.0%, compared to a category average of just 3.8%. That gap is substantial. Iron Mountain sits second at 25.0% visibility. Every other brand in the top 10 registers 0.0% visibility, meaning only two brands are actively surfacing in Google AI Mode responses. The concentration of AI presence in two names suggests the category is effectively a two-brand landscape for AI-generated answers.
Iron Mountain presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset. Its visibility is 25.0% but its citation rate reaches 62.5%, the highest citation figure in the category. ERI shows the inverse pattern, with 50.0% visibility but only 25.0% citation. Sims Lifecycle Services is cited at 25.0% despite zero visibility, meaning AI sources reference it without surfacing it as a named answer. Named presence and trusted sourcing are not the same signal here.
All top brands anchor on Google AI Mode as their primary engine, with no other engine appearing in the data. The top cited sources in the category include goworkwize.com, reconext.com, gartner.com, and ironmountain.com directly. Gartner's presence in the citation list suggests AI is pulling from analyst and aggregator content to validate answers, not solely from vendor domains. Reconext and goworkwize appearing above many established ITAD brands indicates third-party listicle and workflow content is influencing AI sourcing heavily.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
ERI 0% → 50% · rank #0 → #1+50pp
-
Iron Mountain 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
eridirect.com
|
50% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
ERI leads all 20 brands with 50.0% visibility, more than 13 times the category average, but its 25.0% citation rate trails Iron Mountain by 37.5 percentage points. |
||||
| 2 |
ironmountain.com
|
25% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Iron Mountain holds the highest citation rate in the category at 62.5%, despite visibility of only 25.0%, suggesting AI treats it as a trusted source more than a primary answer. |
||||
| 3 |
simslifecycle.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Sims Lifecycle Services earns a 25.0% citation rate with zero visibility, meaning AI references it in supporting content but does not surface it as a direct category answer. |
||||
| 4 |
aptosolutions.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Apto Solutions sits at 0.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, matching three other brands at rank 4 through 7, reflecting no meaningful AI differentiation at this tier. |
||||
| 5 |
thinkdynamic.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations shares an identical composite score of 3.8 with Apto Solutions and two other brands, indicating no distinguishing AI signal separates these mid-tier players. |
||||
| 6 |
cascade-assets.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
techreset.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
hobi.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
sipi.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
sagese.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
compucom.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
redemtech.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
planitroi.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
wisetek.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
3stepit.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
procurri.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
completeit.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
cxtec.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
ingrammicro.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
tes-amm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on it asset disposition companies, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own it asset disposition companies brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about it asset disposition companies AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the IT asset disposition category?
ERI leads with 50.0% visibility in Google AI Mode, more than double the second-ranked brand Iron Mountain at 25.0%. Every other brand in the top 10 records 0.0% visibility.
Which ITAD brand is cited most often by Google AI Mode?
Iron Mountain has the highest citation rate at 62.5%, exceeding ERI's 25.0% citation rate despite having lower visibility, suggesting AI treats Iron Mountain as a reference source rather than a primary answer.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for ITAD category research?
The top cited sources include goworkwize.com, reconext.com, gartner.com, and ironmountain.com directly. Third-party aggregator and workflow sites appear alongside analyst platforms like Gartner.
How concentrated is AI visibility across the 20 ITAD brands audited?
Extremely concentrated. Only two of the 20 brands, ERI and Iron Mountain, have any visibility above 0.0%, and the category average visibility sits at just 3.8%.
Can an ITAD brand be cited by AI without appearing as a visible answer?
Yes. Sims Lifecycle Services is cited 25.0% of the time but has 0.0% visibility, confirming that citation and named-answer visibility are distinct and do not move together in this category.
Which AI engine dominates sourcing for the IT asset disposition category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset. No other engine appears as a leading source across any of the 20 brands audited.