Influencer analytics platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank influencer analytics platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Influencer analytics platforms used to evaluate creators, measure audience quality, benchmark campaigns, and improve ROI for influencer marketing programs. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about influencer analytics platforms, AI engines frequently point to HypeAuditor as the industry leader. This brand, along with Modash and Tagger, consistently tops the list of recommendations. HypeAuditor leads with a visibility percentage of 37.5 percent, making it a prominent choice among those seeking comprehensive influencer analytics solutions.
The rankings reflect the predominance of insights drawn from top-cited sources like youtube.com, influencer-hero.com, and influee.co. These sites function as aggregators and review hubs, greatly influencing the visibility of prominent brands. The reliance on such platforms suggests an emphasis on user reviews and peer comparisons in shaping AI recommendations.
For buyers examining this list, it is essential to consider what AI engines prioritize, such as recent reviews and third-party validation. These factors contribute to a brand’s perceived authority within this niche sector. Evaluating platforms through this lens can provide meaningful insights into which service might offer the best fit for a company’s specific influencer marketing needs.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
HypeAuditor leads the influencer analytics platforms category with a visibility score of 37.5%, more than four times the category average of 9.4%. Modash sits second at 25.0%, and both brands held their ranks from the previous period while growing visibility by 12.5 percentage points each. The gap between HypeAuditor and the third-ranked brand, Tagger at 12.5%, is substantial, meaning AI responses in this category are disproportionately shaped by two brands while the remaining 18 compete for a narrow share.
The data reveals a sharp divergence between visibility and citation across several brands. Tagger holds only 12.5% visibility yet carries a 37.5% citation rate, matching Sprout Social Influencer Marketing which has 0.0% visibility but also 37.5% citation. GRIN shows the inverse pattern with 25.0% visibility and 0.0% citations. This means AI responses mention GRIN regularly without linking to it as a source, while Tagger and Sprout Social are trusted as references even when not prominently named in answer text.
Every brand in the top ten records Google AI Mode as its top engine, indicating this category's AI visibility landscape is almost entirely concentrated on a single engine. The top cited sources include youtube.com, influencer-hero.com, influee.co, sproutsocial.com, and dashsocial.com, none of which are the primary domains of the highest-visibility brands. This suggests Google AI Mode is pulling citations from third-party review and comparison content rather than anchoring directly on the platforms being evaluated.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
HypeAuditor 25% → 38% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
-
Modash 12% → 25% · rank #2 → #2+12pp
-
Tagger 0% → 12% · rank #5 → #3+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
hypeauditor.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
HypeAuditor leads at 37.5% visibility, four times the 9.4% category average, but its citation rate dropped 12.5 points to match Modash at just 12.5%. |
||||
| 2 |
modash.io
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Modash doubled its visibility from 12.5% to 25.0% period over period, yet its citation rate also fell 12.5 points, leaving it named often but referenced less frequently. |
||||
| 3 |
sproutsocial.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Tagger holds the highest citation rate in the top five at 37.5%, three times its visibility score of 12.5%, signalling AI treats it as a trusted source more than a named answer. |
||||
| 4 |
grin.co
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
GRIN achieves 25.0% visibility, well above the 9.4% average, but records 0.0% citations, meaning AI mentions it without ever linking to its domain as a reference. |
||||
| 5 |
upfluence.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Upfluence sits at 12.5% visibility and 12.5% citation, both at the category average, with no standout strength or weakness separating it from peers ranked 7 through 10. |
||||
| 6 |
sproutsocial.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
meltwater.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
creatoriq.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
traackr.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
klear.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
later.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
later.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
brandwatch.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
aspire.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
heepsy.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
captiv8.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
influencity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
creator.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
iqfluence.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
juliusworks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on influencer analytics platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own influencer analytics platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about influencer analytics platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in influencer analytics platforms?
HypeAuditor leads with 37.5% visibility, more than four times the category average of 9.4%. Modash ranks second at 25.0%, and no other brand exceeds 12.5%.
Which influencer analytics platform is cited most often by AI as a source?
Tagger and Sprout Social Influencer Marketing each carry a 37.5% citation rate, the highest in the category, despite Tagger having only 12.5% visibility and Sprout Social having 0.0% visibility.
What sources does AI cite most for influencer analytics platform research?
The top cited sources in this category are youtube.com, influencer-hero.com, influee.co, sproutsocial.com, and dashsocial.com, which are third-party or comparison sites rather than the platforms themselves.
Which engine dominates AI visibility for this category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the top ten, indicating the category's AI visibility is almost entirely concentrated on a single engine with no meaningful presence elsewhere in the data.
Are there brands with high visibility but no citations in this category?
Yes. GRIN records 25.0% visibility but 0.0% citations, and Meltwater, CreatorIQ, Traackr, and Klear each show 12.5% visibility with 0.0% citations, meaning AI names them without referencing their domains.
Which brands grew AI visibility the most in the latest period?
HypeAuditor, Modash, and Tagger each grew visibility by 12.5 percentage points, with Tagger making the largest rank jump, moving from fifth to third place.