In-app messaging software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank in-app messaging software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Platforms used to deliver targeted in-app messages, onboarding prompts, nudges, announcements, and lifecycle campaigns inside products. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines discuss In-app messaging software, Userpilot often emerges as the leader, mentioned in 37.5% of relevant outputs. Other notable brands like OneSignal and Pushwoosh also appear frequently. Userpilot's strong presence indicates its recognized authority and reliability in the field, making it a key contender for those seeking dependable solutions.
The rankings are shaped by citations from leading sources such as pushwoosh.com, guideflow.com, and learn.g2.com. These are primarily aggregator and review sites, providing a consensus view that emphasizes brands with consistent user positive feedback and reliability. This influences AI engines to rank them higher due to the detailed, user-oriented content available.
For buyers evaluating these software solutions, understanding what AI engines prioritize is crucial. Brands with recent reviews and strong third-party validations tend to rank higher. So, as you consider options on this list, pay attention to those backed up by up-to-date testimonials and independent authority, highlighting their relevance and user satisfaction.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Userpilot and OneSignal share the top visibility score at 37.5% each, far above the category average of 6.2%. That gap is significant: the next tier of brands (Pushwoosh, CleverTap, Braze) sits at 12.5% visibility, and half of the top ten brands record 0.0% visibility. Userpilot holds a composite score of 33.8 against OneSignal's 30.0, giving it the rank-one position despite identical visibility, because its citation rate (25.0%) is double OneSignal's (12.5%).
Pushwoosh presents the sharpest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset. Its visibility is only 12.5%, yet its citation rate reaches 37.5%, the highest in the category. CleverTap shows a similar pattern at 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation. By contrast, OneSignal is the inverse case: 37.5% visibility but only 12.5% citation. This means AI surfaces OneSignal frequently in responses but does not anchor source links to its domain at the same rate.
Every brand in this audit records Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming that this category's AI visibility is concentrated entirely within one engine. Among the top cited sources, pushwoosh.com and userpilot.com both appear, alongside third-party domains including learn.g2.com, guideflow.com, zapier.com, and refiner.io. The presence of review and how-to platforms in the citation list suggests AI is drawing on editorial and comparison content, not just vendor sites, when constructing answers.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
OneSignal 0% → 38% · rank #7 → #2+38pp
-
Userpilot 12% → 38% · rank #4 → #1+25pp
-
Pushwoosh 0% → 12% · rank #6 → #3+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Sendbird 25% → 0% · rank #2 → #8-25pp
-
Braze 25% → 12% · rank #1 → #5-12pp
-
Intercom 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #9-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
userpilot.com
|
38% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Userpilot leads with a composite score of 33.8, holding 37.5% visibility and 25.0% citation, both well above the category averages of 6.2% and 6.9%. |
||||
| 2 |
onesignal.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
OneSignal matches Userpilot's 37.5% visibility but its citation rate of 12.5% is half that of Userpilot, pulling its composite score down to 30.0. |
||||
| 3 |
pushwoosh.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Pushwoosh holds the highest citation rate in the dataset at 37.5%, yet its visibility is only 12.5%, producing a composite score of 20.0. |
||||
| 4 |
clevertap.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
CleverTap records 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation, making it the second-highest cited brand despite sitting at rank four by composite score (16.2). |
||||
| 5 |
braze.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Braze has fallen from rank one to rank five, losing 12.5 percentage points of visibility to sit at 12.5%, with a composite score of 12.5. |
||||
| 6 |
appcues.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
moengage.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
sendbird.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
intercom.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
customer.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
iterable.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
airship.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
pendo.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
webengage.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
batch.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
wonderpush.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
hubspot.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
salesforce.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
useinsider.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
leanplum.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on in-app messaging software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own in-app messaging software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about in-app messaging software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in in-app messaging software?
Userpilot and OneSignal are tied at 37.5% visibility, but Userpilot holds rank one due to a higher citation rate of 25.0% compared to OneSignal's 12.5%.
Which brand is cited most often by AI in this category?
Pushwoosh has the highest citation rate at 37.5%, ahead of Userpilot at 25.0% and CleverTap at 25.0%, despite Pushwoosh's visibility being only 12.5%.
What sources does AI cite most for in-app messaging software research?
The top cited sources include pushwoosh.com, userpilot.com, learn.g2.com, guideflow.com, zapier.com, and refiner.io, showing a mix of vendor and third-party editorial domains.
Which brands have lost the most AI visibility recently?
Sendbird and Intercom each fell six rank positions and now record 0.0% visibility, while Braze dropped from rank one to rank five with a visibility loss of 12.5 percentage points.
Which engine drives AI visibility in the in-app messaging software category?
Every brand in the audit lists Google AI Mode as its top engine, meaning the entire category's AI visibility is currently concentrated in that single engine.
How concentrated is AI visibility across the 20 brands in this category?
The category average visibility is only 6.2%, and half of the top ten brands record 0.0% visibility, indicating that AI attention is heavily concentrated in two or three brands.