monitoraeo
AI Visibility Rankings · Hospitality

Hotels in Edinburgh: AI search visibility ranking (2026)

How AI search engines rank hotels in edinburgh by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Hotels serving Edinburgh travellers across the Old Town, New Town, Princes Street, and city-centre luxury districts with landmark, boutique, and design stays. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Refreshed Jun 16, 2026
11%
Avg visibility across category
0%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

At a glance

Category leader The Balmoral 75% visibility · named in 6 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand The Balmoral 0% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in hotels in edinburgh
Top cited domain google.com Referenced by AI across the hotels in edinburgh query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 75pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 12 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this categoryauto-generated

The Balmoral leads the Edinburgh hotels category with a visibility score of 75%, nearly double that of second-placed The Bonham at 50%. This gap is significant because it means Google AI Mode surfaces The Balmoral in three out of every four relevant queries, while most competitors appear in fewer than one in eight. The category average visibility sits at just 10.6%, so both The Balmoral and The Bonham are statistical outliers pulling the average upward rather than reflecting typical brand performance in this space.

Every brand in the top 10 carries a citation rate of exactly 0.0%, meaning Google AI Mode names these hotels in responses but does not link back to their own domains as sources. This creates a clear divergence between being mentioned (visibility) and being trusted as a reference point (citation). Brands like The Balmoral achieve high narrative presence in AI answers without their own websites being credited, which means the AI is drawing on third-party content to construct its descriptions rather than pulling directly from brand-owned pages.

The top cited sources in this category are google.com, travel.usnews.com, reddit.com, expedia.com, and travel blog abroadwithash.com, among others. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode is anchoring its Edinburgh hotel responses on aggregator platforms, review communities, and editorial travel content rather than hotel brand websites. The presence of community.ricksteves.com and reddit.com alongside OTAs like kayak.com and expedia.ca indicates that conversational and user-generated content carries meaningful weight in shaping how AI describes and recommends Edinburgh hotels.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • The Balmoral 0% → 75% · rank #0 → #1
    +75pp
  • The Bonham 0% → 50% · rank #0 → #2
    +50pp
  • Virgin Hotels Edinburgh 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3
    +25pp

The ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
roccofortehotels.com
75% 0% Google AI Mode

The Balmoral holds 75% visibility, more than seven times the category average of 10.6%, and recorded a full 75-point rise from zero in the previous period.

2
thebonham.com
50% 0% Google AI Mode

The Bonham sits at 50% visibility, roughly five times the category average, but like every ranked brand carries a citation rate of 0%, showing no direct domain credit.

3
virginhotels.com
25% 0% Google AI Mode

Virgin Hotels Edinburgh reaches 25% visibility, more than double the category average, representing a 25-point gain from zero in the prior audit period.

4
thewitchery.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode

The Witchery by the Castle sits at 12.5% visibility, matching the category average exactly and sharing that score with three other brands at ranks 5 through 8.

5
ihg.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode

Kimpton Charlotte Square, hosted under the ihg.com domain, scores 12.5% visibility, the same as three peers, with no citation credit distinguishing it from that cluster.

6
scotsmanhotel.co.uk
12% 0% Google AI Mode
7
prestonfield.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode
8
malmaison.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode
9
gleneagles.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
10
marriott.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
11
hilton.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
chevalcollection.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
ihg.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
marketstreethotel.co.uk
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
hotelduvin.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
fingal.co.uk
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
marriott.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
chevalcollection.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
autograph-hotels.marriott.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
100princes-street.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on hotels in edinburgh, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

google.comabroadwithash.comtravel.usnews.comcommunity.ricksteves.comreddit.comkayak.comexpedia.caexpedia.com

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.

Get your own hotels in edinburgh brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your hotels in edinburgh brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about hotels in edinburgh AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility in Hotels in Edinburgh?

The Balmoral leads with 75% visibility, followed by The Bonham at 50%. Both are well above the category average of 10.6%.

What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Edinburgh hotel research?

The top cited sources include google.com, travel.usnews.com, expedia.com, reddit.com, and abroadwithash.com, indicating a heavy reliance on aggregators, OTAs, and user-generated content.

Do any Edinburgh hotel brands receive citation credit from Google AI Mode?

No. Every brand in the audit carries a citation rate of 0.0%, meaning brand-owned domains are not being credited as sources even when hotels are named in AI responses.

How concentrated is AI visibility in this category?

It is highly concentrated. The Balmoral and The Bonham together account for a large share of AI mentions, while six brands are clustered at just 12.5% visibility and two rank-9 and rank-10 brands sit at zero.

Are there any brands that have fallen in AI visibility in this audit period?

The data shows no biggest visibility fallers in this period. All movement recorded is upward, with The Balmoral, The Bonham, and Virgin Hotels Edinburgh each rising from zero in the previous audit.

How does the Kimpton Charlotte Square's parent domain affect its AI visibility standing?

Kimpton Charlotte Square is indexed under ihg.com rather than a dedicated brand domain, yet its visibility at 12.5% is no different from independently-domained competitors like The Scotsman Hotel, suggesting domain authority is not the differentiating factor here.