Gym management software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank gym management software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Gym management platforms used to run memberships, class schedules, check-ins, billing, staff operations, and retention for fitness businesses. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 10, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
PushPress dominates the gym management software AI visibility landscape with a composite score of 61.2 — more than 50% higher than the next closest brands, ABC Glofox and Exercise.com, both sitting at 40.0. Its visibility of 50.0% is double that of its nearest rivals and stands against a category average of just 7.5%. This gap is structurally significant: PushPress appears in AI responses at a rate that effectively crowds out mid-tier competitors, creating a two-tier market where the leader captures disproportionate AI surface area.
A notable divergence exists between visibility and citation across the category. Mindbody and Wodify each achieve 12.5% visibility but carry 0.0% citation rates, meaning Google AI Mode surfaces them in responses without anchoring to their domains as sources. Conversely, TeamUp and WellnessLiving hold 0.0% visibility yet 25.0% citation rates — present in the source layer but absent from named brand mentions. PushPress shows the strongest alignment between the two metrics at 50.0% visibility and 87.5% citation, suggesting its content is both mentioned and trusted as a reference.
Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all 20 brands in this audit, with no alternative engine registering as a top performer for any brand. The cited sources anchoring AI responses include brand-owned domains — exercise.com, pushpress.com, glofox.com, zenplanner.com — alongside third-party platforms reddit.com, youtube.com, and getkisi.com. The presence of Reddit and YouTube in the top cited sources indicates AI is drawing on community and video content, not solely vendor documentation, to construct its gym management software answers.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility fallers
-
ABC Glofox 38% → 25% · rank #0 → #2-12pp
-
Exercise.com 38% → 25% · rank #0 → #3-12pp
-
TeamUp 12% → 0% · rank #0 → #8-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
pushpress.com
|
50% | 88% | Google AI Mode |
PushPress leads with 50.0% visibility and 87.5% citation — both more than double the next-ranked brands — giving it the category's only composite score above 60. |
||||
| 2 |
glofox.com
|
25% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
ABC Glofox ties Exercise.com at a composite score of 40.0 and 25.0% visibility, but has fallen from 37.5% visibility in the prior period, signalling a downward trajectory. |
||||
| 3 |
exercise.com
|
25% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Exercise.com matches ABC Glofox exactly at 25.0% visibility and 75.0% citation yet also dropped 12.5 visibility points from the prior period, and its domain ranks first in cited sources. |
||||
| 4 |
zenplanner.com
|
12% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Zen Planner's 50.0% citation rate relative to only 12.5% visibility suggests it is referenced as a source more often than it is named, indicating partial but uneven AI recognition. |
||||
| 5 |
gymmaster.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
GymMaster holds 12.5% visibility but only 25.0% citation — the lowest citation rate among ranked brands with any visibility — pointing to weak source authority in AI responses. |
||||
| 6 |
mindbodyonline.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
wodify.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
goteamup.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
wellnessliving.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
virtuagym.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
rhinofit.ca
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
clubready.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
ezfacility.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
momence.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
marianatek.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
pike13.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
hapana.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
vagaro.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
perfectgym.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
ashbourne-memberships.co.uk
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on gym management software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own gym management software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about gym management software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in gym management software?
PushPress leads with 50.0% visibility and a composite score of 61.2, more than 21 points ahead of the next closest brands, ABC Glofox and Exercise.com, both at 40.0.
What is the average AI visibility for gym management software brands?
The category average visibility is just 7.5%, meaning PushPress at 50.0% is more than six times the average, reflecting extreme concentration at the top.
Which brands are cited by AI but not named in responses?
TeamUp and WellnessLiving both carry 25.0% citation rates despite 0.0% visibility, indicating Google AI Mode uses their content as source material without surfacing them as named brands.
What sources does AI cite most for gym management software research?
The top cited sources are exercise.com, pushpress.com, gymdesk.com, glofox.com, reddit.com, youtube.com, zenplanner.com, and getkisi.com, with community platforms Reddit and YouTube notable alongside vendor-owned domains.
Which brands have high visibility but zero citation in this category?
Mindbody and Wodify each appear in AI responses at a 12.5% visibility rate but hold 0.0% citation, meaning AI mentions them without drawing on their domains as trusted sources.
Which brands have seen the largest AI visibility declines recently?
ABC Glofox, Exercise.com, and TeamUp are the only recorded fallers, each dropping 12.5 visibility points from the prior period, with no brands recording visibility gains in this audit.