AEO Rankings · Finance

AEO for FP&A consulting firms: AI search visibility ranking

By monitoraeo Last updated August 16, 2026 Refreshed every 90 days

How AI search engines rank FP&A consulting firms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. FP&A consulting firms that help finance teams with planning, forecasting, reporting, scenario modeling, and enterprise performance improvement. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Avg visibility across category

Avg citation rate

20/20

Brands successfully audited

X LinkedIn

When AI engines are asked about FP&A consulting firms, EY emerges as the leader, mentioned in 62.5% of responses. Deloitte and PwC also appear regularly but trail behind EY's prominence in AI visibility. This recognition underscores EY's dominance in the consulting landscape according to AI-generated answers.

The rankings reflect data sourced from sites like cbh.com, Reddit, and LinkedIn, alongside content from YouTube and The Hackett Group. These aggregators and social platforms influence AI visibility, highlighting the importance of diverse sources in shaping perceptions. An emphasis on community-driven and third-party content helps explain the high visibility of these brands.

For a buyer considering an FP&A consulting firm, it's crucial to understand how AI engines prioritize. They value recent reviews, third-party validation, and authority in specific subcategories. Evaluating how consistently a brand is cited across these diverse sources can provide insights into its reputation and credibility in the industry.

At a glance

Category leader EY 62% visibility · named in 5 of 8 AI answers

Most cited brand CrossCountry Consulting 38% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in FP&A consulting firms

Top cited domain cbh.com Referenced by AI across the FP&A consulting firms query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category

Visibility spread 62pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 14 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this category

EY leads the FP&A consulting firms AEO landscape with a visibility score of 62.5%, more than double Deloitte's 25.0% and nearly five times the category average of 6.9%. That gap is significant because it means Google AI Mode surfaces EY in responses far more consistently than any competitor. However, EY's citation rate sits at 0.0%, meaning the AI mentions the brand without linking to its domain, which limits the direct referral value of that visibility advantage.

CrossCountry Consulting presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset. It holds 0.0% visibility yet earns a 37.5% citation rate, the highest in the category, suggesting Google AI Mode pulls CrossCountry as a trusted source in answers even without naming it prominently in brand lists. Armanino shows a similar pattern with 0.0% visibility and 25.0% citation. PwC is the only top-five brand achieving both metrics simultaneously, at 12.5% each, though it also recorded a visibility decline of 12.5 points from the prior period.

Google AI Mode is the sole engine recorded across all 20 brands in this audit, confirming that AEO performance in this category is effectively a single-engine question for now. The top cited external sources include reddit.com, linkedin.com, youtube.com, and specialist sites such as thehackettgroup.com and fpnaconsulting.com. This pattern suggests the AI anchors its FP&A responses on community discussion and niche practitioner content rather than on the consulting firms' own domains, which explains the near-zero citation rates for even the highest-visibility brands.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility fallers

EY 88% → 62% · rank #1 → #1
-25pp
KPMG 25% → 0% · rank #4 → #18
-25pp
PwC 25% → 12% · rank #3 → #3
-12pp

The AEO ranking

#	Brand	Visibility	Citation	Top engine
1	EY ey.com	62%	0%	Google AI Mode
EY leads with 62.5% visibility, nine times the 6.9% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate means Google AI Mode names it without linking to ey.com.
2	Deloitte deloitte.com	25%	0%	Google AI Mode
Deloitte holds 25.0% visibility, well above average, yet also records 0.0% citations, placing it in the same named-but-not-linked position as the category leader EY.
3	PwC pwc.com	12%	12%	Google AI Mode
PwC is the only top-three brand earning both visibility and citations at 12.5% each, though its visibility fell 12.5 points from the prior period per the faller data.
4	CrossCountry Consulting crosscountry-consulting.com	0%	38%	Google AI Mode
CrossCountry achieves the highest citation rate in the dataset at 37.5% despite 0.0% visibility, indicating AI treats its content as a trusted source rather than a named brand.
5	CFGI cfgi.com	12%	0%	Google AI Mode
CFGI matches Alvarez and Marsal and Accenture with a 12.5% visibility score and 0.0% citations, producing a composite of 8.8, the lowest among the top five ranked brands.
6	Alvarez & Marsal alvarezandmarsal.com	12%	0%	Google AI Mode
7	Accenture accenture.com	12%	0%	Google AI Mode
8	Armanino armanino.com	0%	25%	Google AI Mode
9	Embark embarkwithus.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
10	Grant Thornton grantthornton.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
11	Baker Tilly bakertilly.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
12	RSM rsmus.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
13	BPM bpm.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
14	Connor Group connorgp.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
15	RGP rgp.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
16	Citrin Cooperman citrincooperman.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
17	BDO bdo.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
18	KPMG kpmg.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
19	Riveron riveron.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
20	E78 Partners e78partners.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on FP&A consulting firms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

cbh.comreddit.comyoutube.comthehackettgroup.comlinkedin.comseidmanfinancial.comfpnaconsulting.comvault.com

How to read this AEO ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →

AEO rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →

Run an AEO audit on your own FP&A consulting firms brand

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your FP&A consulting firms brand → Browse all AEO rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about AEO for FP&A consulting firms

Who leads AEO in FP&A consulting firms?

EY leads with a visibility score of 62.5% and a composite score of 43.8, both well above the next-ranked brand Deloitte at 25.0% visibility and 17.5 composite.

Which FP&A consulting brand is cited most by AI despite low visibility?

CrossCountry Consulting earns a 37.5% citation rate while recording 0.0% visibility, the largest gap between the two metrics in the dataset.

What sources does AI cite most for FP&A consulting research?

Google AI Mode anchors FP&A answers on third-party and community sources including reddit.com, linkedin.com, youtube.com, thehackettgroup.com, and specialist sites such as fpnaconsulting.com, rather than on consulting firm domains.

Which FP&A consulting brands have seen the biggest AEO visibility drops?

EY fell 25.0 points from 87.5% to 62.5%, KPMG dropped 25.0 points from 25.0% to 0.0% and fell from rank 4 to rank 18, and PwC declined 12.5 points from 25.0% to 12.5%.

Is Google AI Mode the only engine that matters for AEO in this category?

Based on this audit, yes. Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for all 20 brands in the dataset, making it the single engine shaping AEO outcomes in FP&A consulting right now.

How do visibility and citation scores differ in FP&A consulting AEO?

Visibility measures how often a brand is mentioned in AI responses, while citation measures how often its domain is linked. In this category the two diverge sharply, with CrossCountry and Armanino earning strong citation rates of 37.5% and 25.0% respectively while holding 0.0% visibility.