Financial advisors in Redlands: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank financial advisors in redlands by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Financial advisory firms serving Redlands households, business owners, retirees, and professionals with wealth planning, retirement advice, investment strategy, insurance, and holistic financial guidance across the Redlands Coast and greater south-east Queensland catchment. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 29, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Count (count.com.au) holds the only non-zero composite score in this category, sitting at 35.0 with 50.0% visibility against a category average of just 2.5%. Every other ranked brand, including Morgans, Ord Minnett, Findex, and Shadforth Financial Group, records 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation. That gap is not marginal. Count is the sole brand Google AI Mode acknowledges at all, meaning the entire competitive field is effectively invisible in AI-generated responses for this local category.
Across all 20 brands, citation percentage is 0.0% without exception, including Count despite its 50.0% visibility score. This means Count is named in AI responses but not cited as a source link, a meaningful divergence. No brand in this category has converted AI visibility into a trusted, hyperlinked citation. The named-versus-trusted gap is absolute here, and it applies uniformly regardless of brand size or rank.
The top cited sources in this category are google.com, m.yelp.com, kwbwealth.com, nerdwallet.com, youtube.com, stifel.com, usbank.com, and thumbtack.com. Notably, none of these are Australian financial advisory brand domains. The AI is anchoring on directory and review platforms plus US-based financial brands, which explains why local Australian firms like Morgans, Findex, and Shadforth generate zero visibility. The source layer driving AI answers does not reflect the local competitive set.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Count 0% → 50% · rank #0 → #1+50pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
count.com.au
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Count holds a 50.0% visibility score and composite score of 35.0, placing it 20 times above the 2.5% category average, though its citation rate remains 0.0%. |
||||
| 2 |
morgans.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Morgans sits at rank 2 but records 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation, meaning it holds no measurable presence in Google AI Mode responses for this category. |
||||
| 3 |
ords.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Ord Minnett matches Morgans with a 0.0% composite score, offering no differentiation in AI visibility despite its established market presence outside this audit. |
||||
| 4 |
findex.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Findex records 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation, indistinguishable from the 16 other zero-scoring brands in a category where only Count registers any AI presence. |
||||
| 5 |
shadforth.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Shadforth Financial Group scores 0.0% on all metrics, sharing the same flat profile as ranks 2 through 20, with no signal separating it from lower-ranked peers. |
||||
| 6 |
shawandpartners.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
wilsonsadvisory.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
fitz.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
stanfordbrown.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
insightwealth.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
lifespanfp.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
riadvice.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
investblue.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
infocus.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
oreana.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
rhombusadvisory.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
mercer.com/en-au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
wtfglimited.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
aia.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
centrepointalliance.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on financial advisors in redlands, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own financial advisors in redlands brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about financial advisors in redlands AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility among financial advisors in Redlands?
Count (count.com.au) is the sole leader with 50.0% visibility and a composite score of 35.0. Every other brand in the audit records 0.0% visibility.
What is the average AI visibility for financial advisors in Redlands?
The category average visibility is 2.5%, pulled entirely by Count's 50.0% score, as all other 19 brands contribute 0.0%.
Which brands are cited as sources by AI for financial advisor queries in Redlands?
No Australian financial advisory brand in this audit is cited. The top cited sources are google.com, m.yelp.com, nerdwallet.com, and US-based platforms like usbank.com and stifel.com.
Does any brand in this category earn both visibility and citation in Google AI Mode?
No. Count achieves 50.0% visibility but 0.0% citation, and all other brands score 0.0% on both metrics, meaning the named-versus-cited gap affects every brand.
Why do most local financial advisor brands in Redlands have zero AI visibility?
The AI is anchoring on directory and review sites such as m.yelp.com and thumbtack.com plus US-based financial domains, none of which are local Australian advisory brand sites.
Has any brand shown a significant recent change in AI visibility for this category?
Count is the only brand listed as a visibility riser, jumping from 0.0% to 50.0% visibility in the most recent period. No brands appear in the fallers list.