Feature management and experimentation platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank feature management and experimentation platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Platforms used to manage feature flags, progressive rollouts, holdouts, and product experiments across web and app environments. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 13, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Statsig leads this category with 37.5% visibility, more than double LaunchDarkly's 25.0% and far above the category average of 5.0%. That gap is significant because the next ranked brand, Kameleoon, records 0.0% visibility entirely, meaning the top three composite scores are held by brands occupying two completely different visibility tiers. Statsig's composite score of 26.2 versus Kameleoon's 18.8 illustrates how a brand can rank third overall while being entirely absent from named mentions.
The most striking divergence in this dataset is between visibility and citation. Kameleoon has 0.0% visibility but 62.5% citation, the highest citation rate in the category. Harness Feature Flags shows the same pattern at 0.0% visibility and 50.0% citation. Statsig is the inverse, with 37.5% visibility and 0.0% citation. This means Google AI Mode names Statsig frequently in responses but does not link or attribute its domain, while Kameleoon and Harness are trusted as source references without being named as recommended brands.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the audit is concentrated there. The top cited sources include youtube.com, kameleoon.com, harness.io, amplitude.com, vwo.com, launchdarkly.com, gartner.com, and reddit.com. The presence of YouTube and Reddit alongside Gartner suggests the AI is pulling from discussion and review content as much as analyst reports. Kameleoon and Harness appearing as cited sources directly explains their high citation percentages despite zero visibility.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Statsig 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1+38pp
-
LaunchDarkly 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Optimizely 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #5+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
statsig.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Statsig holds 37.5% visibility, 7.5 times the category average of 5.0%, but records 0.0% citation, meaning it is named without being linked as a source. |
||||
| 2 |
launchdarkly.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
LaunchDarkly is the only top-5 brand combining positive visibility (25.0%) and positive citation (12.5%), making it the most balanced performer in the dataset. |
||||
| 3 |
kameleoon.com
|
0% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Kameleoon ranks third overall despite 0.0% visibility, driven entirely by a 62.5% citation rate, the highest of any brand in the category. |
||||
| 4 |
harness.io
|
0% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Harness Feature Flags mirrors Kameleoon's pattern with 0.0% visibility and 50.0% citation, ranking fourth purely on source-trust rather than named mentions. |
||||
| 5 |
optimizely.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Optimizely ties Split and GrowthBook on composite score (8.8) and visibility (12.5%), but records 0.0% citation, giving it no source-authority signal in the AI. |
||||
| 6 |
split.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
growthbook.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
amplitude.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
vwo.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
configcat.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
getunleash.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
abtasty.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
eppo.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
devcycle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
apptimize.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
adobe.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
firebase.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
flagsmith.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
featbit.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
posthog.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on feature management and experimentation platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own feature management and experimentation platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about feature management and experimentation platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in feature management and experimentation platforms?
Statsig leads with 37.5% visibility, more than double LaunchDarkly's 25.0% and well above the category average of 5.0%. Its composite score of 26.2 places it clearly ahead of all other brands.
Which brands are cited most as sources by Google AI Mode in this category?
Kameleoon (62.5% citation) and Harness Feature Flags (50.0% citation) are the most frequently cited sources, both appearing in the top cited sources list alongside youtube.com, gartner.com, and reddit.com.
Can a brand rank highly in this category without being named in AI responses?
Yes. Kameleoon (rank 3) and Harness Feature Flags (rank 4) both have 0.0% visibility but achieve high composite scores through citation rates of 62.5% and 50.0% respectively.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on most when answering queries about this category?
The top cited sources are youtube.com, kameleoon.com, harness.io, amplitude.com, vwo.com, launchdarkly.com, gartner.com, and reddit.com, indicating a mix of vendor sites, analyst content, and community discussion.
Which brands have both visibility and citation, making them the most well-rounded in AI presence?
LaunchDarkly is the only top-5 brand with both meaningful visibility (25.0%) and a positive citation rate (12.5%), making it the sole brand with a balanced AI presence profile.
How concentrated is AI visibility in this category among the top brands?
Visibility is heavily concentrated: only four of the top 10 brands record any visibility at all, and the category average sits at just 5.0% across 20 brands.