Family lawyers in New York: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank family lawyers in new york by visibility and citations. 17 providers measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. New York family law firms handling divorce, custody, support, mediation, and matrimonial matters for individuals and families. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When searching for Family lawyers in New York, AI engines frequently mention Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan LLP as a leader in the field. Alongside Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan LLP, firms such as Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco LLP and Stanick & El-Naggar LLC are also highlighted. Although Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan LLP has no measurable visibility percentage, they lead with a 12.5% citation rate.
The rankings are influenced by the sources AI engines draw from, with top-cited domains being Google.com, Justia.com, and Berkbot.com. These sources frequently collect and publish reviews and ratings, affecting which law firms stand out in search results. Aggregator and review sites play a significant role in how these rankings are presented to those seeking legal services.
For buyers, this means that evaluating recent reviews and third-party validation is crucial when choosing from this list. AI engines favor firms with consistent, positive feedback and recognized expertise in specific areas of family law. As you consider your options, pay close attention to how firms are characterized in these top-cited sources to inform your decision.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Aronson Mayefsky and Sloan LLP holds rank 1 in this category with a composite score of 3.8, making it the sole brand to register any meaningful AI presence. The gap between it and every other tracked brand is absolute: ranks 2 through 10 all carry composite scores of 0.0. This is not a competitive landscape with a clear leader and a trailing pack. It is a category where AI visibility is almost entirely absent, with one partial exception at the top.
The divergence between visibility and citation is sharp for the rank 1 brand. Aronson Mayefsky and Sloan LLP records a 12.5 percent citation rate but a 0.0 percent visibility score, meaning the AI cites the firm in responses without it registering as a visible, described entity in those outputs. Every other brand in the top 10 scores 0.0 on both metrics. The category average citation rate is just 0.7 percent, confirming that being cited at all is an outlier outcome here.
The top cited sources for this category are dominated by third-party directories and aggregators, including justia.com, attorneys.superlawyers.com, and berkbot.com, alongside google.com and youtube.com. Firm-owned domains appear only sporadically, with levoritzlaw.com and clementlaw.com listed. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode is anchoring its responses on directory and review platforms rather than on the websites of the 17 tracked firms, which helps explain why brand-level visibility scores are uniformly zero.
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
amsllp.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Category leader at 0% visibility — named in roughly 0 of every 8 AI answers. Citation rate of 12% means the brand wins both recommendation and trust. |
||||
| 2 |
ppid.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
0pp behind the leader on visibility but with a similar citation rate (0% vs 12%) — closer to being the AI's trusted source than its top recommendation. |
||||
| 3 |
stanickelnaggar.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Third tier at 0% visibility. Roughly tracks the category average on citation rate (0% vs 1% average). |
||||
| 4 |
mshahlaw.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 5 |
turnerdivorcemediation.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 6 |
agarunovlaw.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
penakahn.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
mandellawfirm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
schpoontcavallo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
lawsb.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
wmllp.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
malikpopiel.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
jlglaw.nyc
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
bhattalaw.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
turturrolawpc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
wbny.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
aidalalaw.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on family lawyers in new york, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own family lawyers in new york brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about family lawyers in new york AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the Family Lawyers in New York category?
Aronson Mayefsky and Sloan LLP leads with a composite score of 3.8. Every other tracked brand scores 0.0, making this the only firm with any measurable AI presence.
What is the average AI visibility score for Family Lawyers in New York?
The average visibility score across all 17 tracked brands is 0.0 percent, with an average citation rate of just 0.7 percent.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Family Lawyers in New York research?
The most cited sources are third-party platforms including justia.com, attorneys.superlawyers.com, berkbot.com, and google.com, rather than individual law firm websites.
Is there a meaningful gap between the top-ranked and second-ranked firms in this category?
Yes. Rank 1 (Aronson Mayefsky and Sloan LLP) has a composite score of 3.8 and a 12.5 percent citation rate, while rank 2 through rank 10 all score 0.0 on every metric.
Can a firm be cited by AI without having any visibility score in this category?
Yes. Aronson Mayefsky and Sloan LLP has a 12.5 percent citation rate but a 0.0 percent visibility score, showing that citation and described visibility are recorded separately and do not always align.
Are any brands showing rising or falling AI visibility trends in this category?
No. The audit data records no biggest visibility risers and no biggest visibility fallers, indicating the category is static with no tracked movement across brands.