Family lawyers in Adelaide: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank family lawyers in adelaide by visibility and citations. 6 providers measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Adelaide family law firms handling divorce, parenting disputes, property settlements, mediation, support issues, and complex domestic relationship matters. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When asking about Family lawyers in Adelaide, AI engines frequently mention Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers as a leading provider, along with Stanley & Co. Lawyers and Norman Waterhouse. Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers stands out with a citation visibility of 12.5%, affirming its prominence in the legal community.
The rankings are influenced by top cited sources such as google.com, lawconnect.com, and swanfamilylawyers.com.au. These platforms, particularly aggregator and review sites, heavily contribute to the visibility and citation percentages seen among the brands. This reflects their importance in relaying trusted information to AI engines.
For a buyer reading this page, it is important to consider these rankings as they highlight recent reviews and third-party validations. AI engines emphasize topical authority in the family law category, so finding a lawyer recognized on consistently cited platforms could be crucial for ensuring quality and specialized expertise.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers holds the top rank in the Adelaide family law category with a composite score of 3.8, the only brand above zero. Its citation rate of 12.5 percent sits above the category average of 2.1 percent, meaning it is the single brand Google AI Mode has found worth citing. The gap to every other tracked brand is absolute: five brands score 0.0 across visibility, citation, and composite, making this a category where one player has a nominal foothold and the rest have none.
The data reveals a sharp divergence between being named and being trusted by AI. Norman Waterhouse previously held rank 1 with 25.0 percent visibility but has fallen to rank 3 with 0.0 percent visibility and no citation, a drop of 25 visibility points. DBH Lawyers similarly fell from rank 2 to rank 4, losing 12.5 visibility points while also holding 0.0 citation. Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers has no recorded visibility yet carries a 12.5 percent citation rate, suggesting citation and visibility are not moving together in this category.
Google AI Mode is the sole engine recorded across all six brands. The top cited sources in this category are dominated by directories and firms outside the tracked brand set, including lawconnect.com, lawzana.com, swanfamilylawyers.com.au, clarkpanagakos.com.au, and randletaylor.com.au. This pattern indicates Google AI Mode is anchoring its responses on third-party legal directories and untracked smaller firms rather than the established Adelaide family law brands represented in this audit.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Norman Waterhouse 25% → 0% · rank #1 → #3-25pp
-
DBH Lawyers 12% → 0% · rank #2 → #4-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
tgb.com.au
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Holds the only non-zero composite score at 3.8 and the only citation rate at 12.5 percent, while all five rivals sit at 0.0 across every metric. |
||||
| 2 |
stanleyco.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Records 0.0 across visibility, citation, and composite, placing it equal with three other brands and well below the category average citation rate of 2.1 percent. |
||||
| 3 |
normans.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
The steepest faller in the audit, dropping from rank 1 with 25.0 percent visibility to rank 3 with 0.0 percent, the largest single visibility decline recorded. |
||||
| 4 |
dbh.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Fell from rank 2 to rank 4 with a 12.5 point visibility loss and retains 0.0 citation, giving it no measurable AI presence in the current period. |
||||
| 5 |
moloneyandpartners.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sits at 0.0 on all metrics with no rank movement recorded, showing no differentiation from the zero-score cluster occupying ranks 2 through 6. |
||||
| 6 |
piperalderman.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on family lawyers in adelaide, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own family lawyers in adelaide brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about family lawyers in adelaide AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility among family lawyers in Adelaide?
Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers leads with a composite score of 3.8 and a citation rate of 12.5 percent. Every other tracked brand scores 0.0 across all metrics.
What is the average AI citation rate for family lawyers in Adelaide?
The category average citation rate is 2.1 percent. Only Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers exceeds this, at 12.5 percent, while all five other brands sit at 0.0 percent.
Which brands have lost the most AI visibility in this category?
Norman Waterhouse lost 25.0 visibility points, falling from rank 1 to rank 3, and DBH Lawyers lost 12.5 visibility points, falling from rank 2 to rank 4. Both now record 0.0 visibility.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Adelaide family law queries?
The top cited sources include lawconnect.com, lawzana.com, swanfamilylawyers.com.au, clarkpanagakos.com.au, and randletaylor.com.au, none of which are among the six tracked brands.
Is there any brand showing growth in AI visibility in this category?
No. The audit records zero visibility risers for this category, with all movement being negative or flat.
Does high AI citation rate correlate with high visibility in this category?
No. Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers holds a 12.5 percent citation rate but 0.0 percent visibility, indicating citation and visibility are diverging in this category.