monitoraeo
AI Visibility Rankings · Legal

Family lawyers in Adelaide: AI search visibility ranking (2026)

How AI search engines rank family lawyers in adelaide by visibility and citations. 6 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Adelaide family law firms handling divorce, parenting disputes, property settlements, mediation, support issues, and complex domestic relationship matters. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Refreshed Jun 09, 2026
6%
Avg visibility across category
0%
Avg citation rate
6/6
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

At a glance

Category leader Norman Waterhouse 25% visibility · named in 2 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Norman Waterhouse 0% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in family lawyers in adelaide
Top cited domain google.com Referenced by AI across the family lawyers in adelaide query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 25pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 4 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this categoryauto-generated

Norman Waterhouse leads the Adelaide family law category with a visibility score of 25.0%, more than double DBH Lawyers at 12.5%, and four times the category average of 6.2%. The remaining four brands — Stanley & Co. Lawyers, Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers, Moloney & Partners, and Piper Alderman Family Law — all register 0.0% visibility. This is not a competitive landscape; it is a two-brand race with a significant concentration of AI presence at the top and a complete absence of representation for the majority of tracked firms.

Despite Norman Waterhouse and DBH Lawyers holding visible positions in Google AI Mode, both carry a citation rate of 0.0%, matching every other brand in the category. The category average citation rate is also 0.0%. This means Google AI Mode is naming these firms in responses without linking back to their domains, creating a named-but-not-trusted dynamic where brand mention does not translate into verifiable source attribution. Visibility and citation are entirely decoupled across all six brands.

The top cited sources in this category are dominated by third-party and directory platforms — lawconnect.com, adelaidefamilylawyers.com.au, and jffamilylawyers.com.au — alongside general platforms reddit.com and facebook.com. None of the six tracked brands appear in the cited sources list, suggesting Google AI Mode is anchoring its factual sourcing on aggregator and community platforms rather than the individual firm websites it mentions by name. This pattern indicates the AI draws brand recognition from one signal set and citation authority from another.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • Norman Waterhouse 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1
    +25pp
  • DBH Lawyers 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2
    +12pp

The ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
normans.com.au
25% 0% Google AI Mode

Norman Waterhouse leads all tracked brands with 25.0% visibility, four times the 6.2% category average, yet holds a 0.0% citation rate identical to every competitor.

2
dbh.com.au
12% 0% Google AI Mode

DBH Lawyers ranks second with 12.5% visibility, exactly half of Norman Waterhouse's score and double the category average, but shares the universal 0.0% citation rate.

3
stanleyco.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Stanley & Co. Lawyers holds rank 3 with 0.0% visibility and a composite score of 0.0, placing it statistically indistinguishable from the three brands ranked below it.

4
tgb.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers records 0.0% visibility and a composite score of 0.0, offering no AI presence despite being a recognised Adelaide family law firm in traditional search.

5
moloneyandpartners.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Moloney & Partners sits at rank 5 with 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation rate, sharing a zero composite score with both the brand above and below it in this audit.

6
piperalderman.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on family lawyers in adelaide, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

google.comlawconnect.comswanfamilylawyers.com.audirosalawyers.com.aureddit.comfacebook.comjffamilylawyers.com.auadelaidefamilylaw.com.au

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.

Get your own family lawyers in adelaide brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your family lawyers in adelaide brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about family lawyers in adelaide AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility among family lawyers in Adelaide?

Norman Waterhouse leads with 25.0% visibility in Google AI Mode, followed by DBH Lawyers at 12.5%. All four remaining tracked brands record 0.0% visibility.

What is the average AI visibility for family lawyers in Adelaide?

The category average visibility is 6.2%, heavily skewed by Norman Waterhouse and DBH Lawyers, as four of six brands contribute 0.0% to that figure.

Which brands are cited by AI when discussing family lawyers in Adelaide?

No tracked brand holds any citations — every firm in the audit records a 0.0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode does not link back to any of their domains.

What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Adelaide family law queries?

The top cited sources include third-party platforms lawconnect.com, adelaidefamilylawyers.com.au, jffamilylawyers.com.au, reddit.com, and facebook.com — none of which are the websites of the six tracked firms.

Are there brands that have recently entered AI visibility in this category?

Yes — both Norman Waterhouse and DBH Lawyers are identified as the biggest visibility risers, moving from 0.0% to 25.0% and 12.5% respectively since the previous audit period.

Does higher AI visibility translate to higher citation rates for Adelaide family lawyers?

No — Norman Waterhouse and DBH Lawyers have the highest visibility scores in the category but both carry 0.0% citation rates, identical to brands with zero visibility.