E-commerce fraud prevention software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank e-commerce fraud prevention software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. E-commerce fraud prevention software used to detect risky transactions, reduce chargebacks, and protect merchants from account and payment abuse. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 13, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Riskified leads the e-commerce fraud prevention category with a visibility score of 37.5%, more than 12 points clear of the four brands tied at 25% (Sift, Forter, SEON, ClearSale). The category average visibility sits at just 8.1%, meaning Riskified operates at roughly 4.6 times the average, a gap that signals concentrated AI attention on a single brand. That concentration matters because buyers using AI Mode for research will disproportionately encounter Riskified framing before any competitor.
The sharpest divergence between visibility and citation belongs to Fraud.net, which holds 0% visibility yet records a 37.5% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the dataset. Riskified shows the inverse: 37.5% visibility with 0% citations. Sift is the only brand achieving meaningful scores on both dimensions (25% visibility, 25% citation), making it the sole brand that is both named frequently and actively linked as a source. Most brands cluster at zero on at least one axis.
Every brand in the top 10 lists Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming that this category's AI visibility landscape is effectively a single-engine story. The top cited sources include third-party domains such as fingerprint.com, fraud.net, gartner.com, and g2.com alongside brand-owned domains like sift.com and signifyd.com. The presence of Gartner and G2 among the anchoring sources suggests the AI is drawing heavily on analyst and review-site content rather than vendor marketing pages alone.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Riskified 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1+38pp
-
Sift 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Forter 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
riskified.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Riskified leads all 20 brands with 37.5% visibility, nearly 4.6 times the 8.1% category average, yet records zero citation rate, meaning AI names it without linking to it. |
||||
| 2 |
sift.com
|
25% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Sift is the only brand matching its 25% visibility with an equal 25% citation rate, making it the sole dual-presence performer and one of the top cited sources in the category. |
||||
| 3 |
forter.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Forter shares the 25% visibility tier with SEON and ClearSale but holds a 0% citation rate, giving it brand mentions in AI responses without any source-link authority. |
||||
| 4 |
seon.io
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
SEON sits at 25% visibility and 0% citations, statistically identical to Forter and ClearSale, reflecting a mid-tier cluster that AI Mode treats as broadly interchangeable in this category. |
||||
| 5 |
clear.sale
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
ClearSale matches SEON and Forter at 25% visibility and 0% citations, with a composite score of 17.5 placing it in the same tier but trailing Sift's 25.0 composite by a meaningful margin. |
||||
| 6 |
signifyd.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
fraud.net
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
kount.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
accertify.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
stripe.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
ravelin.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
nofraud.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
sardine.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
datadome.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
bolt.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
chargeflow.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
ethoca.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
vesta.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
checkout.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
visa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on e-commerce fraud prevention software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own e-commerce fraud prevention software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about e-commerce fraud prevention software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in e-commerce fraud prevention software?
Riskified leads with 37.5% visibility, well above the category average of 8.1% and more than 12 points ahead of the next tier. However, it records zero citations, so it is named frequently but not linked as a source.
Which brand has the highest citation rate in this category?
Fraud.net holds the highest citation rate at 37.5%, despite having 0% visibility, meaning AI responses link to it as a source without actively naming it as a recommended brand.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for e-commerce fraud prevention research?
The top cited sources include fingerprint.com, fraud.net, bureau.id, gartner.com, shadowdragon.io, sift.com, g2.com, and signifyd.com, suggesting the AI anchors on a mix of analyst sites, review platforms, and specialist vendor domains.
Is any single brand achieving strong performance on both visibility and citation simultaneously?
Only Sift achieves meaningful scores on both dimensions, recording 25% visibility and 25% citation rate, making it the sole brand with dual presence in this category.
Which engine dominates AI visibility in this category?
Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for every brand in the top 10, making the category's AI visibility landscape a single-engine story with no meaningful presence from other AI platforms in this dataset.
How concentrated is AI visibility across the 20 brands in this category?
Visibility is highly concentrated, with the category average at just 8.1% and the top brand (Riskified) at 37.5%. Six of the top 10 brands record either 0% visibility or 0% citations, indicating most brands have very limited AI presence.