AEO for disaster recovery as a service: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank disaster recovery as a service by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Disaster recovery as a service platforms used to replicate workloads, minimize downtime, and recover business systems after outages or cyber incidents. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT and Google AI are asked about Disaster recovery as a service, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery leads the conversation, being referenced in 25% of responses. Close competitors include 11:11 Systems and Azure Site Recovery. AWS's notable mention by AI engines underscores its prominence and reliability in this sector.
The rankings are shaped by top-cited sources such as gartner.com, youtube.com, and cloudian.com. These sources, many of which are aggregator or review sites, heavily influence AI responses by providing comprehensive evaluations and peer reviews. The high citation rate from these domains indicates their role as trusted voices in determining brand visibility.
For a buyer, it's crucial to consider how AI engines prioritize certain brands, often valuing recent reviews, third-party validation, and specific topical authority. Choose a brand that frequently appears in authoritative sources, as this reflects broader industry approval and reliable performance in disaster recovery solutions.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery holds the top composite score of 25.0, rising from rank 8 to rank 1 with a visibility delta of 25.0 percentage points. That movement is the largest in the category and creates a meaningful gap over the nearest competitor, 11:11 Systems at 20.0. Azure Site Recovery matches AWS on raw visibility at 25.0 percent but sits at rank 3, which signals that visibility alone does not determine overall standing when citation performance is factored in.
The visibility-to-citation split reveals a sharp divergence across this category. Azure Site Recovery has 25.0 percent visibility and zero citation share, while Veeam and TierPoint each carry zero visibility but 37.5 percent citation share. This means Google AI Mode names Azure Site Recovery in answers but does not link out to it, whereas Veeam and TierPoint are being cited as source references without appearing as named brands in direct responses. 11:11 Systems is the only brand that scores well on both dimensions simultaneously.
Every brand in the top ten records Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming the dataset reflects a single-engine picture. Among external sources cited in this category, gartner.com leads the list, followed by youtube.com and niche comparison sites including solutionsreview.com and cloudian.com. The presence of 1111systems.com and axcient.com as cited sources alongside independent review platforms suggests the AI is anchoring on a mix of analyst authority and specialist comparison content rather than vendor documentation alone.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery 0% → 25% · rank #8 → #1+25pp
-
Datto 0% → 12% · rank #7 → #8+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Acronis 38% → 12% · rank #1 → #4-25pp
-
Veeam 25% → 0% · rank #2 → #5-25pp
-
Druva 25% → 0% · rank #4 → #13-25pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
aws.amazon.com
|
25% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
AWS leads with a composite score of 25.0, five points clear of second place, after jumping from rank 8 with a visibility gain of 25.0 percentage points this period. |
||||
| 2 |
1111systems.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
11:11 Systems punches above its 12.5 percent visibility with a 37.5 percent citation rate, the joint highest in the top ten, making it the strongest citation-relative-to-visibility performer. |
||||
| 3 |
azure.microsoft.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Azure Site Recovery matches AWS on visibility at 25.0 percent but holds a 0.0 percent citation rate, the starkest visibility-to-citation gap among all ranked brands. |
||||
| 4 |
acronis.com
|
12% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Acronis fell from rank 1 to rank 4 after a 25.0 point visibility drop, though its citation rate rose by 12.5 points, suggesting residual trust in external references despite reduced named appearances. |
||||
| 5 |
veeam.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Veeam dropped from rank 2 to rank 5 with current visibility at 0.0 percent, yet retains a 37.5 percent citation rate, identical to TierPoint and higher than AWS at 25.0 percent. |
||||
| 6 |
tierpoint.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
zerto.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
datto.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
cohesity.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
rubrik.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
arcserve.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
vmware.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
druva.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
cloud.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
commvault.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
sungardas.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
recoverypoint.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
11:11systems.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
unitrends.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
carbonite.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on disaster recovery as a service, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own disaster recovery as a service brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for disaster recovery as a service
Who leads AEO in Disaster recovery as a service right now?
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery leads with a composite score of 25.0 and a visibility share of 25.0 percent, having risen from rank 8 in the previous period. 11:11 Systems sits second with a composite score of 20.0.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Disaster recovery as a service queries?
Gartner.com appears at the top of the cited source list, followed by youtube.com, cloudian.com, axcient.com, and solutionsreview.com, alongside the vendor domain 1111systems.com.
Which brands are cited frequently but not named directly in AI answers?
Veeam and TierPoint both hold 37.5 percent citation rates but 0.0 percent visibility, meaning Google AI Mode references their content without naming them as recommended solutions in direct responses.
Is it possible to have high visibility but low citation in this category?
Yes. Azure Site Recovery records 25.0 percent visibility alongside a 0.0 percent citation rate, showing that appearing in AI answers and being linked as a source are distinct AEO outcomes.
Which brands have lost the most AEO ground in Disaster recovery as a service?
Acronis, Veeam, and Druva are the three biggest visibility fallers, each dropping 25.0 percentage points in visibility. Druva suffered the largest rank change, falling nine positions from rank 4 to rank 13.
How concentrated is AEO performance across this category?
The category average visibility is 5.0 percent and average citation is 10.0 percent, while the top brand holds 25.0 percent on both metrics, indicating that visibility and citation share are heavily concentrated at the top two to three brands.