Digital asset delivery networks: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank digital asset delivery networks by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. CDN and edge delivery platforms used to accelerate websites, apps, media, and static assets globally. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about Digital asset delivery networks from AI engines, Cloudinary consistently emerges as the leader. With a visibility rating of 25%, it outpaces competitors like Cloudflare and Fastly, making it a top choice for many. This prominence suggests that Cloudinary is frequently recommended and cited by AI models when discussing this infrastructure service.
The rankings are shaped by frequently cited sources like aprimo.com, medium.com, and youtube.com. These platforms often aggregate expert reviews and user feedback, serving as comprehensive resources for AI to draw information from. This reliance on authoritative and popular domains ensures that the suggested brands are backed by a wide range of insights and evaluations.
For buyers examining this page, it is crucial to consider what factors AI engines prioritize, such as recent reviews and third-party validation. Brands excelling in these areas, like Cloudinary, tend to rank higher due to their demonstrated topical authority and credibility within specific subcategories of digital asset delivery networks.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Cloudinary leads the digital asset delivery networks category with a composite score of 25.0, the only brand where visibility and citation are perfectly aligned at 25.0% each. Cloudflare matches Cloudinary on visibility at 25.0% but records zero citation, pulling its composite down to 17.5. That 7.5-point composite gap between the top two brands illustrates how named presence and trusted citation are being measured differently by Google AI Mode, and why raw visibility alone overstates a brand's actual AI authority.
The visibility-versus-citation divergence is the defining pattern in this category. Cloudflare and Akamai both hold meaningful visibility scores (25.0% and 12.5% respectively) yet carry 0.0% citation rates, meaning the AI mentions them without anchoring to their content. ImageKit is the sharpest counter-example, scoring 0.0% visibility but 25.0% citation, ranking fifth overall on composite. This inverted profile suggests Google AI Mode is drawing on ImageKit as a source reference without surfacing it in direct brand mentions.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, indicating the audit is concentrated on that single surface. The top cited sources in this category, including aprimo.com, brandfolder.com, bynder.com, and thedigitalprojectmanager.com, are mostly digital asset management platforms and editorial sites rather than CDN vendor domains. This signals that Google AI Mode is anchoring its category responses on DAM-adjacent content and third-party editorial sources rather than on the infrastructure vendors' own domains.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Cloudinary 12% → 25% · rank #3 → #1+12pp
-
Cloudflare 12% → 25% · rank #1 → #2+12pp
-
Fastly 0% → 12% · rank #4 → #3+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Bunny.net 12% → 0% · rank #2 → #20-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
cloudinary.com
|
25% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Cloudinary is the only top-5 brand with perfectly matched visibility and citation at 25.0% each, placing it 6.6 times above the category average composite of 3.8. |
||||
| 2 |
cloudflare.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cloudflare ties Cloudinary on visibility at 25.0% but its zero citation rate drops its composite to 17.5, a 7.5-point penalty versus the category leader. |
||||
| 3 |
fastly.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Fastly holds a composite of 12.5 with equal visibility and citation scores, having risen from zero visibility in the previous period, matching the rank-3 position. |
||||
| 4 |
akamai.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Akamai mirrors Cloudflare's pattern with 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation, yielding a composite of 8.8 and confirming a recurring zero-citation issue among legacy CDN brands. |
||||
| 5 |
imagekit.io
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
ImageKit records 0.0% visibility yet 25.0% citation, the highest citation rate in the dataset, suggesting AI is referencing its content without naming it in brand-level responses. |
||||
| 6 |
aws.amazon.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
cloud.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
azure.microsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
edg.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
gcore.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
keycdn.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
imperva.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
cdn77.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
leaseweb.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
cachefly.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
medianova.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
alibabacloud.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
vercel.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
netlify.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
bunny.net
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on digital asset delivery networks, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own digital asset delivery networks brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about digital asset delivery networks AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in digital asset delivery networks?
Cloudinary leads with a composite score of 25.0, the highest in the category, driven by equal visibility and citation rates of 25.0% each. Cloudflare ties on visibility but its zero citation rate places it second at a composite of 17.5.
Which brand has the biggest gap between visibility and citation in this category?
ImageKit has the most extreme divergence, recording 0.0% visibility alongside a 25.0% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the entire dataset. Cloudflare and Akamai show the opposite gap, with strong visibility and zero citation.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for digital asset delivery network research?
The top cited sources include aprimo.com, brandfolder.com, bynder.com, and thedigitalprojectmanager.com. These are predominantly DAM platforms and editorial sites rather than the infrastructure vendors themselves.
Which brand experienced the largest drop in AI visibility recently?
Bunny.net fell 18 rank positions, dropping from rank 2 to rank 20, with visibility declining from 12.5% to 0.0% and citation falling by 12.5 percentage points.
How concentrated is AI visibility across brands in this category?
Visibility is heavily concentrated, with the category average sitting at just 3.8% and only four brands recording any visibility above zero. The remaining brands in the 20-brand dataset score 0.0% on both visibility and citation.
Does being mentioned more often in AI responses mean a brand is also cited more?
Not in this category. Cloudflare and Akamai both have above-average visibility but zero citation rates, while ImageKit achieves the highest citation rate with no visibility at all, showing that mention frequency and source citation are tracked separately.