AEO for dermatologists in New York: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank dermatologists in New York by visibility and citations. 10 providers measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Dermatology practices serving New York patients with medical dermatology, cosmetic dermatology, skin cancer screening, laser treatments, and advanced skincare services. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When you ask AI engines about Dermatologists in New York, 'The Dermatology Specialists' frequently comes up as the leader. Park Avenue Dermatology and Spring Street Dermatology also appear at the top. The Dermatology Specialists holds a 12.5% visibility rate among AI answers, highlighting its prominence in this category.
The rankings are heavily influenced by sources like google.com and castleconnolly.com. These platforms are aggregators and review sites, meaning they collect diverse opinions and expert recommendations. Their influence suggests that AI engines weigh both the breadth and credibility of available information.
For anyone choosing from this list, consider recent reviews and third-party validation. AI engines prioritize dermatologists with strong topical authority and positive, recent client feedback. Ensuring these factors can help you make a more informed decision tailored to your specific dermatological needs.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
The Dermatology Specialists holds the only non-zero visibility score in the category at 12.5%, against a category average of just 1.2%. Its composite score of 8.8 is the highest recorded, and it recently rose from rank 3 to rank 1 with a visibility delta of 12.5 percentage points. Seven of the ten tracked brands score zero on both visibility and citation, which means the gap between the leader and the rest of the field is effectively absolute rather than marginal.
Park Avenue Dermatology presents the clearest divergence between visibility and citation in this dataset. It holds 0.0% visibility but a 25.0% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the category, giving it a composite score of 7.5. Spring Street Dermatology follows the same pattern with 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation. This means AI is referencing these brands as sources without surfacing them in named brand responses, a distinction that matters for how each brand is perceived versus trusted by the model.
Google AI Mode is the top engine recorded for all ten brands, with no engine diversity in the data. The top cited sources in this category include google.com, castleconnolly.com, nyulangone.org, zocdoc.com, and instagram.com, alongside parkderm.com itself. The presence of Castle Connolly and NYU Langone signals that the AI is anchoring heavily on institutional and directory authority rather than practice websites, which likely explains why brands with strong directory or hospital affiliations earn citations even with zero direct visibility.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
The Dermatology Specialists 0% → 12% · rank #3 → #1+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Schweiger Dermatology Group 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #5-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
thedermspecs.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
The only brand with non-zero visibility at 12.5%, it scores 8.8 composite after rising two ranks, but its citation rate dropped 12.5 points in the same period. |
||||
| 2 |
parkderm.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Zero visibility but a category-leading 25.0% citation rate, with its domain appearing directly in the top cited sources list, making it the most trusted but least surfaced brand. |
||||
| 3 |
springstderm.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Mirrors the Park Avenue pattern with 0.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, scoring 3.8 composite, roughly half the score of Park Avenue despite the same zero-visibility status. |
||||
| 4 |
clearforme.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Records zero on all three metrics, visibility, citation, and composite score, placing it among seven brands with no measurable AI presence in this audit period. |
||||
| 5 |
schweigerderm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
The biggest faller in the category, dropping four rank positions from 1 to 5 with a visibility delta of negative 12.5 points, now recording zero on all metrics. |
||||
| 6 |
nydermatologygroup.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
silvermirror.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
manhattandermatologistsnyc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
dinastrachanmd.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
donnelleydermatology.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on dermatologists in New York, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own dermatologists in New York brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for dermatologists in New York
Who leads AI visibility in the Dermatologists in New York category?
The Dermatology Specialists leads with 12.5% visibility and a composite score of 8.8, the only brand in the tracked set with a non-zero visibility figure.
Which brand is cited most often by Google AI Mode in this category?
Park Avenue Dermatology has the highest citation rate at 25.0%, and its domain parkderm.com appears directly in the list of top cited sources for the category.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when responding to dermatologist queries in New York?
The audit data shows google.com, castleconnolly.com, nyulangone.org, zocdoc.com, and instagram.com as leading cited sources, alongside two individual practice domains.
How many brands in this category have zero AI visibility?
Nine of the ten tracked brands record 0.0% visibility, meaning only one brand, The Dermatology Specialists, is being surfaced by name in Google AI Mode responses.
Which brand has fallen the most in AI visibility recently?
Schweiger Dermatology Group dropped from rank 1 to rank 5 with a visibility delta of negative 12.5 points, losing all previously recorded visibility and citation in this period.
Can a brand have high citation but zero visibility in Google AI Mode for this category?
Yes, Park Avenue Dermatology and Spring Street Dermatology both record 0.0% visibility alongside citation rates of 25.0% and 12.5% respectively, showing the two metrics can diverge sharply.