monitoraeo
AI Visibility Rankings · Healthcare

Dental imaging software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)

How AI search engines rank dental imaging software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Dental imaging software used to capture, manage, enhance, and review intraoral, panoramic, cephalometric, and CBCT images across dental practices. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Refreshed Jun 15, 2026
2%
Avg visibility across category
2%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

At a glance

Category leader Apteryx 25% visibility · named in 2 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Planmeca 12% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in dental imaging software
Top cited domain youtube.com Referenced by AI across the dental imaging software query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 25pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 17 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this categoryauto-generated

Apteryx leads the dental imaging software category with a visibility score of 25.0%, which is ten times the category average of 2.5% and roughly double the scores of second-ranked DEXIS and third-ranked DentiMax, both at 12.5%. All three of these top-visibility brands entered the rankings from zero in the previous period, meaning the entire visible tier is newly emerged. That gap between first and second place is meaningful because it suggests Google AI Mode is consolidating brand mentions around a single dominant name rather than distributing them evenly.

A clear divergence exists between which brands are named in AI responses and which are trusted enough to be cited as sources. Apteryx, DEXIS, and DentiMax each hold positive visibility scores yet carry a citation rate of 0.0%. Planmeca, Dentsply Sirona, Midmark, and XDR Radiology show the opposite pattern: zero visibility but a 12.5% citation rate each. This means AI is referencing some brands as source material without surfacing them as named recommendations, and naming others without linking back to their domains.

The top cited sources in this category are not dominated by the high-visibility brands. YouTube, softsmile.com, healthcaremarketing.podbean.com, and oryxdental.com all appear in the citation list alongside xdrradiology.com and dentsplysirona.com. This suggests Google AI Mode is drawing on a mix of video content, podcast material, and smaller specialist sites rather than anchoring exclusively on the leading vendors' own domains. The presence of overjet.com and ekimit.com in the citation list further indicates AI is pulling from adjacent AI-in-dentistry sources.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • Apteryx 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1
    +25pp
  • DEXIS 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2
    +12pp
  • DentiMax 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3
    +12pp

The ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
apteryx.com
25% 0% Google AI Mode

Apteryx holds a 25.0% visibility score, ten times the 2.5% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate means AI names it without linking its domain as a source.

2
dexis.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode

DEXIS matches DentiMax exactly at 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation, placing both brands at half the visibility of category leader Apteryx with no source-citation presence.

3
dentimax.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode

DentiMax shares rank-tier with DEXIS at 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation, a composite score of 8.8 that is less than half of Apteryx's 17.5 composite score.

4
planmeca.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode

Planmeca records 0.0% visibility but a 12.5% citation rate, the inverse of the top three brands, meaning AI cites its domain as a source while omitting it from named recommendations.

5
dentsplysirona.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode

Dentsply Sirona mirrors Planmeca with 0.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, and its domain appears directly in the top cited sources list alongside the wider citation cohort.

6
midmark.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
7
xdrradiology.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
8
carestreamdental.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
9
vatech.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
10
owandy.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
11
acteongroup.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
airtechniques.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
sotaimaging.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
morita.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
instrumentariumdental.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
kavo.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
mouthwatch.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
prexion.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
carestack.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
curvedental.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on dental imaging software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

youtube.comsoftsmile.comhealthcaremarketing.podbean.comxdrradiology.comdentsplysirona.comoryxdental.comoverjet.comekimit.com

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.

Get your own dental imaging software brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your dental imaging software brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about dental imaging software AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility in dental imaging software?

Apteryx leads with a 25.0% visibility score, which is ten times the category average of 2.5% and double the score of second-placed DEXIS and DentiMax. All three entered from zero visibility in the prior period.

Which dental imaging software brands are cited as sources by Google AI Mode?

Planmeca, Dentsply Sirona, Midmark, and XDR Radiology each carry a 12.5% citation rate, and dentsplysirona.com and xdrradiology.com appear directly in the top cited sources list for the category.

Are the most visible brands also the most cited in this category?

No. The top three visible brands, Apteryx, DEXIS, and DentiMax, each have a 0.0% citation rate, while the brands that do earn citations, such as Planmeca and Midmark, have 0.0% visibility.

What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for dental imaging software queries?

The top cited sources include youtube.com, softsmile.com, healthcaremarketing.podbean.com, overjet.com, and ekimit.com, indicating AI is drawing on video, podcast, and adjacent AI-in-dentistry content rather than major vendor sites exclusively.

How concentrated is AI visibility in this category?

Visibility is highly concentrated: Apteryx alone holds 25.0% against a 2.5% category average, and eight of the top ten ranked brands have 0.0% visibility, with seven of those also scoring 0.0% citation.

Which brands are rising in AI visibility for dental imaging software?

Apteryx, DEXIS, and DentiMax are the only recorded risers, each moving from 0.0% to their current visibility scores, with no brands recorded as fallers in this audit period.