AEO for dental imaging software: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank dental imaging software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Dental imaging software used to capture, manage, enhance, and review intraoral, panoramic, cephalometric, and CBCT images across dental practices. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When it comes to dental imaging software, AI engines frequently recommend Planmeca, which leads the pack with a visibility percentage of 37.5. Other top brands like Curve Dental and DEXIS also appear prominently in the rankings. These insights indicate which brands are favored by AI when responding to inquiries about the best options available.
The rankings are greatly influenced by frequently cited sources such as curvedental.com, revupdental.com, and youtube.com. Notably, review and aggregator sites like getapp.com contribute significantly to the landscape, highlighting how user opinions and aggregated reviews drive AI recommendations in this sector.
For buyers evaluating the list, consider how AI engines value third-party validation and recent reviews. Choosing a brand that consistently ranks well and is cited by recognized sources ensures topical authority and up-to-date technology in the specific subcategory of dental imaging software.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Planmeca leads the dental imaging software AEO landscape with a composite score of 33.8, driven by a visibility rate of 37.5% against a category average of just 6.2%. DEXIS matches that 37.5% visibility figure yet scores lower overall at 30.0, while Curve Dental sits at 31.2 despite only 12.5% visibility. The gap between first and fifth place (33.8 versus 17.5) is substantial, and below rank five the scores collapse sharply, with ranks six through eight all tied at 3.8 and two brands recording zero.
The most striking divergence in this category is between being named and being cited. Curve Dental is cited in 75% of responses but appears in only 12.5% of prompts, making it the most trusted source relative to its mention rate. DEXIS shows the reverse pattern, appearing in 37.5% of responses but cited in just 12.5%. Apteryx holds a 25% visibility score yet has a 0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode references it without anchoring any sourcing to it. These gaps signal that answer engine optimisation performance here is not uniform across visibility and citation dimensions.
Every brand in the top ten draws its strongest performance from Google AI Mode, confirming the audit is concentrated on a single engine. Among the top cited sources, curvedental.com and revupdental.com appear alongside third-party platforms like getapp.com and youtube.com, suggesting the AI is pulling from review aggregators and video content as well as vendor domains. XDR Radiology is the only brand showing meaningful momentum, rising three ranks with a citation delta of plus 37.5 percentage points, while DEXIS and Carestream Dental both recorded significant declines in visibility and citation over the same period.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
XDR Radiology 0% → 12% · rank #7 → #4+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
DEXIS 50% → 38% · rank #1 → #3-12pp
-
Carestream Dental 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #6-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
planmeca.com
|
38% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Planmeca leads with a composite score of 33.8 and 37.5% visibility, six times the category average, though its 25% citation rate trails Curve Dental significantly. |
||||
| 2 |
curvedental.com
|
12% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Curve Dental achieves the highest citation rate in the category at 75%, despite visibility of only 12.5%, making it the strongest trust signal relative to mention frequency. |
||||
| 3 |
dexis.com
|
38% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
DEXIS matches Planmeca on visibility at 37.5% but converts only 12.5% to citations, and its composite score has fallen after dropping from rank one to rank three. |
||||
| 4 |
xdrradiology.com
|
12% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
XDR Radiology is the fastest riser in the audit, gaining three rank positions with a citation delta of plus 37.5 percentage points and moving from zero to 12.5% visibility. |
||||
| 5 |
apteryx.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Apteryx holds 25% visibility, four times the category average, but records a 0% citation rate, meaning it is named in AI responses without being used as a sourced reference. |
||||
| 6 |
carestreamdental.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
sotaimaging.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
carestack.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
dentimax.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
mouthwatch.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
dentsplysirona.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
midmark.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
vatech.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
owandy.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
acteongroup.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
airtechniques.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
morita.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
instrumentariumdental.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
kavo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
prexion.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on dental imaging software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own dental imaging software brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for dental imaging software
Who leads AEO in dental imaging software?
Planmeca leads with a composite score of 33.8 and 37.5% visibility, well ahead of the 6.2% category average. Curve Dental ranks second overall despite much lower visibility, driven by a 75% citation rate.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for dental imaging software?
The top cited sources include curvedental.com, revupdental.com, and third-party platforms such as getapp.com and youtube.com. This mix suggests the AI draws on review aggregators and video content alongside vendor-owned domains.
Which dental imaging software brands have the biggest gap between visibility and citation?
Apteryx has 25% visibility but a 0% citation rate, the widest gap of any brand in the top five. DEXIS shows the same pattern at a larger scale, appearing in 37.5% of responses but cited in only 12.5%.
Which brands are losing AEO ground in dental imaging software?
DEXIS fell from rank one to rank three with a visibility delta of minus 12.5 percentage points and a citation delta of minus 25 percentage points. Carestream Dental dropped three positions and its visibility fell to zero.
Is there a brand gaining AEO momentum in dental imaging software?
XDR Radiology is the only notable riser, climbing from rank seven to rank four with citation growing by 37.5 percentage points. Its visibility moved from zero to 12.5% in the same period.
How concentrated is AEO performance across the dental imaging software category?
Performance is highly concentrated: the top two brands hold composite scores above 31, while ranks six through eight share a score of 3.8 and two brands in the top ten score zero. The average visibility across the category is just 6.2%.