monitoraeo
AI Visibility Rankings · Security

Top 20 data loss prevention software by AI search visibility (2026)

Data loss prevention platforms used to discover sensitive information, prevent exfiltration, enforce policy, and monitor data movement across endpoints, cloud apps, and email. Ranked by a composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Refreshed Jun 06, 2026
1%
Avg visibility across category
14%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited

At a glance

Category leader Forcepoint 12% visibility · named in 1 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Forcepoint 75% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in data loss prevention software
Top cited domain forcepoint.com Referenced by AI across the data loss prevention software query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 12pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 18 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this categoryauto-generated

Forcepoint dominates this category with a composite score of 31.2 — more than double the second-ranked brand, Cyberhaven at 15.0. Its 12.5% visibility score is matched only by Safetica, but its 75% citation rate is in a different league from every other brand in the set, making it the clear anchor brand in AI-generated DLP responses. With the category average visibility at just 1.2% and average citation at 14.4%, the gap between Forcepoint and the rest of the field is not marginal — it is structural.

Cyberhaven's position exposes a sharp divergence between being named and being cited as a source. It ranks second with a 50% citation rate yet holds 0% visibility, meaning AI surfaces it frequently as a reference but does not feature it prominently in direct responses. Proofpoint follows the same pattern: 37.5% citation, 0% visibility. Safetica is the only brand besides Forcepoint where visibility and citation are aligned, both at 12.5%, suggesting its content is being consumed and surfaced rather than just referenced.

Every brand in the top 10 records Google AI Mode as its top engine, confirming the dataset is entirely anchored on a single engine. The top cited sources list reveals the AI is drawing on a mix of vendor domains — forcepoint.com and cyberhaven.com — alongside analyst and aggregator sources including gartner.com, and community platforms such as reddit.com. The presence of lesser-known domains like teramind.co, strac.io, and kickidler.com in the citation list suggests AI responses in this category are synthesising from a broad, non-obvious source pool beyond the leading vendors.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • Forcepoint 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #1
    +12pp
  • Safetica 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3
    +12pp

The ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
forcepoint.com
12% 75% Google AI Mode

Forcepoint leads the category with a 75% citation rate and 12.5% visibility, both the highest recorded, yielding a composite score of 31.2 versus a category average of roughly 4–5 for most peers.

2
cyberhaven.com
0% 50% Google AI Mode

Cyberhaven holds a 50% citation rate — second only to Forcepoint — yet records 0% visibility, a stark gap indicating AI references but does not directly surface its content in responses.

3
safetica.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

Safetica is the only brand besides Forcepoint with positive visibility (12.5%), but its citation rate matches that figure exactly, giving it a balanced if modest composite score of 12.5.

4
proofpoint.com
0% 38% Google AI Mode

Proofpoint achieves a 37.5% citation rate despite 0% visibility, placing it third for citations while ranking fourth overall, reflecting brand authority without direct AI-surface presence.

5
trellix.com
0% 25% Google AI Mode

Trellix ties ranks 6 and 7 on composite score (7.5) with a 25% citation rate and 0% visibility, offering no differentiation from Nightfall AI or Endpoint Protector in this AI landscape.

6
nightfall.ai
0% 25% Google AI Mode
7
endpointprotector.com
0% 25% Google AI Mode
8
netskope.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
9
fortra.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
10
microsoft.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
11
digitalguardian.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
zscaler.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
gtbtechnologies.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
fidelissecurity.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
egress.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
code42.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
manageengine.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
spirion.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
mimecast.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
broadcom.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on data loss prevention software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

forcepoint.comteramind.cogoogle.comgartner.comstrac.ioreddit.comkickidler.comcyberhaven.com

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.

Get your own data loss prevention software brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your data loss prevention software brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about data loss prevention software AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility in data loss prevention software?

Forcepoint leads with a composite score of 31.2, driven by the category's highest citation rate of 75% and a visibility score of 12.5%, far ahead of second-ranked Cyberhaven at 15.0.

What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for DLP software research?

The top cited sources include forcepoint.com, teramind.co, google.com, gartner.com, strac.io, reddit.com, kickidler.com, and cyberhaven.com, showing a mix of vendor, analyst, and community platforms.

Which DLP brands are cited frequently but not visibly surfaced in AI responses?

Cyberhaven (50% citation, 0% visibility) and Proofpoint (37.5% citation, 0% visibility) are the clearest examples of brands the AI references but does not directly feature in its generated answers.

How concentrated is AI visibility across brands in this category?

Visibility is extremely concentrated — only Forcepoint and Safetica record any visibility at all (both 12.5%), while the remaining eight top-10 brands each sit at 0% against a category average of just 1.2%.

Which engine dominates AI citation activity for data loss prevention software?

Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the top 10 without exception, indicating the entire measured AI visibility landscape for this category is driven by a single engine.

Which brands have shown the most recent movement in AI visibility for DLP software?

Forcepoint and Safetica are the only recorded visibility risers, both moving from 0% to 12.5% visibility, with Forcepoint also gaining 75 citation percentage points in the same period.