AEO for crisis communications firms: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank crisis communications firms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Crisis communications firms helping organizations navigate high-stakes media events, reputation threats, litigation visibility, and executive communications under pressure. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about crisis communications firms, AI engines frequently highlight Edelman as the leader in the field. With a visibility rate of 37.5%, Edelman stands out as the dominant choice. Other notable mentions include FGS Global and Brunswick Group, all of which are acknowledged for their strong market presence and capability.
The current rankings reflect the sources from which AI engines derive their information. The top-cited sources include percepture.com and clutch.co, along with other industry review sites. This reliance on aggregated insights and reviews helps shape the perceived authority and reliability of these brands in the marketplace.
For buyers considering options from this list, it is important to note what AI engines prioritize: recent reviews, third-party validations, and demonstrated topical authority in crisis communications. These factors make Edelman and others appealing choices, as they present a well-rounded profile backed by both expert analysis and user feedback.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Edelman leads the crisis communications category with a visibility score of 37.5%, against a category average of just 5.6%. That gap is substantial: Edelman is roughly 6.7 times more visible than the average brand across the 20 tracked firms. FGS Global, Brunswick Group, and Burson each sit at 25.0%, forming a clear second tier. Brands ranked 5 through 20 register 0.0% visibility, meaning the entire category's AI presence is concentrated in four firms.
A striking pattern in this data is the complete disconnect between visibility and citation: every brand, including the category leader Edelman at 37.5% visibility, carries a citation rate of 0.0%. This means Google AI Mode is naming these firms in responses without linking back to their own domains. The AI appears to treat brand mentions and source citations as entirely separate signals, so being named frequently offers no direct referral traffic benefit under current conditions.
The top cited sources in the category are third-party directories and review aggregators, including clutch.co, odwyerpr.com, and chambers.com, alongside smaller specialist sites such as percepture.com and digitalcrisismanagement.com. None of the cited sources are the firms' own domains. Google AI Mode appears to anchor its responses on independent ranking and review content rather than primary agency websites, which explains why high-visibility brands still record zero citation percentages.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Edelman 12% → 38% · rank #2 → #1+25pp
-
FGS Global 0% → 25% · rank #9 → #2+25pp
-
Brunswick Group 0% → 25% · rank #7 → #3+25pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Kekst CNC 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #5-12pp
-
APCO Worldwide 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #7-12pp
-
Weber Shandwick 12% → 0% · rank #5 → #8-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
edelman.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Edelman leads at 37.5% visibility, more than 6 times the 5.6% category average, and rose from rank 2 previously after a 25-point visibility gain. |
||||
| 2 |
fgsglobal.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
FGS Global jumped 7 rank positions to reach 25.0% visibility, up from 0.0% previously, making it the largest rank-change riser in the category. |
||||
| 3 |
brunswickgroup.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Brunswick Group rose 4 places to 25.0% visibility from a previous 0.0%, matching FGS Global's score but trailing Edelman by 12.5 percentage points. |
||||
| 4 |
bursonglobal.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Burson holds 25.0% visibility and a composite score of 17.5, equal to FGS Global and Brunswick Group, with no citation activity recorded across all engines. |
||||
| 5 |
kekstcnc.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Kekst CNC fell from rank 1 to rank 5 with a 12.5-point visibility drop to 0.0%, the steepest rank decline among all tracked brands in this period. |
||||
| 6 |
teneo.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
apcoworldwide.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
webershandwick.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
fgsglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
fleishmanhillard.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
joelefrank.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
fticonsulting.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
h-advisors.global
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
montiethco.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
infiniteglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
glasshousepr.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
levinsongroup.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
reevemark.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
rubenstein.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
truescope.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on crisis communications firms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own crisis communications firms brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for crisis communications firms
Who leads AI visibility in crisis communications firms?
Edelman leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 26.2, well ahead of the next tier of FGS Global, Brunswick Group, and Burson, which each sit at 25.0%.
What is the average AI visibility for crisis communications firms?
The category average visibility is 5.6% across 20 tracked brands, with 16 of those brands registering 0.0% visibility in the current period.
Which crisis communications brands are cited by Google AI Mode?
No brand in the category records any citations: the average citation rate is 0.0% and even the top-ranked firm, Edelman, has a citation rate of 0.0%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for crisis communications research?
The top cited sources are third-party directories and aggregators including clutch.co, odwyerpr.com, chambers.com, percepture.com, and digitalcrisismanagement.com, none of which are agency-owned domains.
Which brands gained the most AI visibility recently in this category?
Edelman, FGS Global, and Brunswick Group each recorded a 25-point visibility increase, with FGS Global making the largest rank jump, moving from position 9 to position 2.
Which brands lost the most AI visibility in crisis communications?
Kekst CNC, APCO Worldwide, and Weber Shandwick each dropped 12.5 percentage points to 0.0% visibility, with Kekst CNC falling furthest in rank terms, from 1st to 5th.