Coworking spaces in Sydney: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank coworking spaces in sydney by visibility and citations. 16 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Coworking operators serving Sydney founders, agencies, and hybrid teams with flexible desks, private offices, meeting rooms, and premium shared workspace. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 09, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
The Commons dominates AI visibility in the Sydney coworking category with a 50% visibility score — four times the category average of 12.5% — after jumping from rank 9 to rank 1, a gain of 37.5 visibility points. This surge is significant because it displaces WeWork, which fell from rank 1 to rank 2 with a 12.5-point visibility decline, and Fishburners, which dropped from rank 2 to rank 4. A 35-point composite score gap between The Commons and the fifth-ranked Work Club illustrates how concentrated AI share of voice has become at the top.
The data reveals a sharp divergence between being named and being cited. The Commons appears in 50% of AI responses but carries a 0% citation rate, as does Fishburners at 37.5% visibility. Conversely, Servcorp is named in only 12.5% of responses yet is cited in 62.5% — the highest citation rate in the category — and Regus holds 37.5% citations despite 0% visibility. This means AI frequently references Servcorp and Regus as trusted sources without surfacing them as primary answers, while The Commons is described prominently but not linked.
Google AI Mode is the sole top engine recorded for every brand across all 16 players, indicating this category's AI visibility landscape is entirely shaped by a single engine. Among the top cited external sources, tagvenue.com leads, followed by servcorp.com.au, google.com, arielle.com.au, workclubglobal.com, wework.com, deskpass.com, and regus.com. The presence of aggregator and directory domains — tagvenue, deskpass, arielle — alongside brand-owned domains suggests AI is anchoring responses on both third-party listing platforms and individual operator sites.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
The Commons 12% → 50% · rank #9 → #1+38pp
-
Work Club 0% → 12% · rank #4 → #5+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Stone & Chalk 38% → 12% · rank #5 → #8-25pp
-
WeWork 38% → 25% · rank #1 → #2-12pp
-
Fishburners 50% → 38% · rank #2 → #4-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
thecommons.com.au
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
The Commons leads with 50% visibility — four times the 12.5% category average — but its 0% citation rate means AI names it without linking to it. |
||||
| 2 |
wework.com
|
25% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
WeWork holds 25% visibility and a 37.5% citation rate, making it the only top-two brand with meaningful citation presence alongside its naming frequency. |
||||
| 3 |
servcorp.com.au
|
12% | 62% | Google AI Mode |
Servcorp's 62.5% citation rate is the highest in the category despite only 12.5% visibility, signalling AI treats its domain as a trusted reference rather than a primary answer. |
||||
| 4 |
fishburners.org
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Fishburners appears in 37.5% of AI responses — three times the category average — but holds 0% citations, mirroring The Commons' named-but-not-linked pattern. |
||||
| 5 |
workclubglobal.com
|
12% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Work Club's 50% citation rate contrasts with its 12.5% visibility, placing it alongside Servcorp as a brand AI cites far more often than it explicitly names. |
||||
| 6 |
theworkproject.com
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
regus.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
stoneandchalk.com.au
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
tankstreamlabs.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
thegreatroom.co
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
wotso.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
executivecentre.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
hubaustralia.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
spaceandco.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
y-suite.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
christiespaces.com.au
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on coworking spaces in sydney, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own coworking spaces in sydney brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about coworking spaces in sydney AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the Sydney coworking category?
The Commons leads with 50% visibility, up from 12.5% in the prior period after jumping eight rank positions. Its composite score of 35.0 is the highest in the category.
Which brand is most cited by AI in this category despite low visibility?
Servcorp holds a 62.5% citation rate — the highest of any brand — while appearing in only 12.5% of AI responses, the same visibility level as several lower-ranked competitors.
What sources does AI cite most for Sydney coworking research?
The top cited sources are tagvenue.com, servcorp.com.au, google.com, arielle.com.au, workclubglobal.com, wework.com, deskpass.com, and regus.com, a mix of aggregator platforms and brand-owned domains.
Which brands have high AI visibility but zero citations?
The Commons (50% visibility) and Fishburners (37.5% visibility) both carry 0% citation rates, meaning AI describes them in responses but does not link their domains as sources.
Which brands have seen the biggest shifts in AI visibility recently?
The Commons gained 37.5 visibility points and rose eight rank positions, while Stone & Chalk lost 25 visibility points and fell three positions from rank 5 to rank 8.
Which search engine drives AI visibility in this category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every one of the 16 brands audited, meaning the entire category's AI visibility landscape is currently determined by a single engine.