Coworking spaces in Richmond: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank coworking spaces in richmond by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Coworking operators serving Richmond businesses, founders, and remote teams with flexible offices, meeting rooms, private suites, and shared workspace memberships. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 19, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Spaces leads the Richmond coworking category with 87.5% visibility, more than 25 percentage points clear of the next two brands, Venture X and Expansive, both sitting at 62.5%. That gap matters because the average category visibility is just 14.4%, meaning Spaces appears in AI responses at roughly six times the category norm. However, Spaces carries a 0% citation rate, so its dominance is purely presence-based with no source attribution backing it up, which is a structurally fragile position.
The clearest divergence between visibility and citation sits at rank 2 and rank 4. Venture X holds 62.5% visibility and 12.5% citation, and Gather Arts District holds only 25% visibility but also 12.5% citation. That means Gather Arts District is cited as a trusted source at the same rate as Venture X despite appearing far less often. Expansive, despite ranking third on visibility at 62.5%, has a 0% citation rate, putting it in the same trust tier as Spaces rather than its higher-ranked peer.
All ten tracked brands share Google AI Mode as their top engine, confirming this category is almost entirely shaped by a single AI surface. The cited sources list includes aggregator and directory domains such as coworkingmag.com, coworkingcafe.com, and cobizrichmond.com alongside google.com and m.yelp.com. The presence of gatherworkspaces.com and venturex.com in that same sources list explains why those two brands achieve citation rates above zero while higher-visibility peers do not.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Gather Arts District 12% → 25% · rank #5 → #4+12pp
-
Regus 0% → 12% · rank #9 → #6+12pp
-
Novel Coworking 0% → 12% · rank #18 → #7+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Expansive 88% → 62% · rank #2 → #3-25pp
-
Spaces 100% → 88% · rank #1 → #1-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
spacesworks.com
|
88% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Spaces leads at 87.5% visibility, six times the 14.4% category average, but its 0% citation rate means AI mentions it without linking any supporting source. |
||||
| 2 |
venturex.com
|
62% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Venture X matches Expansive on visibility at 62.5% but is the only top-three brand with a citation rate above zero, recording 12.5% against the 1.9% category average. |
||||
| 3 |
expansive.com
|
62% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Expansive sits at 62.5% visibility but has dropped 25 percentage points from 87.5% last period and holds a 0% citation rate, signalling declining AI trust alongside declining reach. |
||||
| 4 |
gatherworkspaces.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Gather Arts District achieves a 12.5% citation rate despite only 25% visibility, matching Venture X on citations while appearing in less than half as many AI responses. |
||||
| 5 |
commonhouse.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Common House shares the 25% visibility tier with Gather Arts District but records a 0% citation rate, giving it a composite score of 17.5 versus Gather Arts District's 21.2. |
||||
| 6 |
regus.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
novelcoworking.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
wework.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
industriousoffice.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
serendipitylabs.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
deskpass.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
officeevolution.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
thecommondesk.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
lucidoffices.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
intelligentoffice.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
premierworkspaces.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
pipelineworkspaces.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
switchyards.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
kiln.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
theworkaroundrva.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on coworking spaces in richmond, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own coworking spaces in richmond brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about coworking spaces in richmond AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the Richmond coworking category?
Spaces leads with 87.5% visibility and a composite score of 61.2, placing it well ahead of second-ranked Venture X at 62.5% visibility and a composite score of 47.5.
Which brand is most cited as a trusted source by AI in this category?
Venture X and Gather Arts District share the highest citation rate at 12.5% each, while all other top-five brands record 0% citations against a category average of just 1.9%.
What sources does AI cite most for Richmond coworking research?
The top cited sources include google.com, coworkingmag.com, coworkingcafe.com, and m.yelp.com, alongside brand-owned domains venturex.com and gatherworkspaces.com.
Which brands have seen the biggest visibility gains recently?
Novel Coworking jumped 11 rank positions from 18th to 7th with a 12.5 percentage point visibility gain, while Regus moved from 9th to 6th and also added 12.5 points of both visibility and citation.
Which brand has lost the most AI visibility in this category?
Expansive dropped 25 percentage points from 87.5% to 62.5% visibility and lost 12.5 points of citation, making it the largest faller despite still holding third place overall.
How concentrated is AI engine coverage in the Richmond coworking category?
All ten tracked brands share Google AI Mode as their sole top engine, indicating this category's AI visibility landscape is driven entirely by a single platform with no meaningful Bing or Perplexity presence recorded.