Coworking spaces in Omaha: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank coworking spaces in omaha by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Coworking operators serving Omaha businesses, founders, and remote teams with flexible offices, meeting rooms, private suites, and shared workspace memberships. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 19, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Spaces holds a commanding position in this category with a visibility score of 100.0 percent, more than double the second-ranked Regus at 50.0 percent. The composite score gap is equally stark, with Spaces at 70.0 versus Regus at 35.0. Below Regus, all remaining tracked brands including WeWork, Industrious, and Venture X register zero visibility and zero composite score, meaning the category is effectively a two-brand conversation in Google AI Mode, with 18 of 20 brands entirely absent.
A striking pattern in this audit is that visibility and citation are completely decoupled across every brand. Spaces appears in AI responses 100 percent of the time yet receives zero citations, and the same zero-citation result applies to every other brand in the set. The category average citation rate is 0.0 percent across all 20 brands. This means Google AI Mode is naming these brands without linking to or sourcing their own domains, making named presence and trusted sourcing entirely separate outcomes here.
The top cited sources in this category are dominated by aggregator and directory properties, specifically coworkingcafe.com, coworkingmag.com, and wezoo.com, alongside google.com itself. Local Omaha-specific sites such as therootcoworking.com, catalystoma.com, and avantspaces.com also appear in the citation layer. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode is anchoring its responses on third-party listing and review platforms rather than on brand-owned domains, which explains why brands with strong name recognition still accumulate zero citation credit.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Spaces 88% → 100% · rank #1 → #1+12pp
-
Regus 38% → 50% · rank #2 → #2+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
spacesworks.com
|
100% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Spaces leads with 100.0 percent visibility and a composite score of 70.0, rising 12.5 points from 87.5 percent previously, yet still earns zero citations in any response. |
||||
| 2 |
regus.com
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Regus holds second place at 50.0 percent visibility and a composite score of 35.0, also up 12.5 points, but like Spaces it receives zero citation credit from Google AI Mode. |
||||
| 3 |
wework.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
WeWork scores zero across visibility, citation, and composite metrics despite being a globally recognised brand, sitting 100 points below Spaces on every measure in this Omaha category. |
||||
| 4 |
industriousoffice.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Industrious registers zero visibility and zero composite score, matching WeWork at the floor and contributing to a category average visibility of just 7.5 percent across all 20 brands. |
||||
| 5 |
venturex.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Venture X holds rank 5 by brand ordering but shares an identical zero score profile with ranks 3 through 20, indicating no meaningful AI presence in this local category. |
||||
| 6 |
expansive.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
serendipitylabs.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
officeevolution.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
thecommondesk.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
lucidoffices.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
intelligentoffice.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
premierworkspaces.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
pipelineworkspaces.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
switchyards.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
deskpass.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
novelcoworking.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
kiln.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
commonhouse.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
cohatch.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
themalin.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on coworking spaces in omaha, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own coworking spaces in omaha brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about coworking spaces in omaha AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in coworking spaces in Omaha?
Spaces leads with 100.0 percent visibility and a composite score of 70.0, far ahead of second-placed Regus at 50.0 percent visibility and a composite score of 35.0.
What is the average AI visibility score for coworking brands in Omaha?
The category average visibility is 7.5 percent across 20 tracked brands, reflecting that 18 of 20 brands score zero visibility in Google AI Mode.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for Omaha coworking research?
The most cited sources include aggregators and directories such as coworkingcafe.com, coworkingmag.com, and wezoo.com, as well as local Omaha operators like therootcoworking.com and catalystoma.com.
Do any coworking brands in Omaha earn citation credit from Google AI Mode?
No, the average citation rate across all 20 brands is 0.0 percent, meaning Google AI Mode names brands in responses but does not link back to any of their owned domains.
Which brands have grown AI visibility the most recently in this category?
Spaces and Regus are the only brands showing visibility growth, each rising by 12.5 percentage points, while no brands recorded any visibility decline in the latest audit period.
Is Google AI Mode the primary engine driving visibility for Omaha coworking brands?
Yes, Google AI Mode is listed as the top engine for every brand in the dataset, and all audit data in this category is sourced exclusively from that engine.