AI Visibility Rankings · Business Services

Coworking spaces in Omaha: AI search visibility ranking (2026)

By monitoraeo Last updated July 19, 2026 Refreshed every 30 days

How AI search engines rank coworking spaces in omaha by visibility and citations. 20 providers measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which providers the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Coworking operators serving Omaha businesses, founders, and remote teams with flexible offices, meeting rooms, private suites, and shared workspace memberships. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Avg visibility across category

Avg citation rate

20/20

Brands successfully audited

X LinkedIn

According to AI engines, "Spaces" takes the lead when it comes to coworking spaces in Omaha, with a notable visibility percentage of 87.5. Other prominent names include "Regus" and "WeWork." The high visibility of "Spaces" indicates a strong presence and recognition among buyers looking for coworking solutions.

The rankings are primarily influenced by data from top-cited sources like "google.com," "coworkingcafe.com," and "modernworksuites.com." These aggregator and review sites compile comprehensive reviews and feedback, giving high-ranking brands extensive exposure. Buyers can trust that these rankings are driven by reliable, diverse insights available through these authoritative domains.

For a buyer, this means ensuring that the chosen provider aligns with what AI engines prioritize: recent reviews, third-party validation, and topical authority within the coworking niche. It's crucial to consider how the top brands are evaluated and whether their offerings meet specific needs, as AI engines rely heavily on aggregated feedback and industry expertise.

At a glance

Category leader Spaces 88% visibility · named in 7 of 8 AI answers

Most cited brand Regus 50% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in coworking spaces in omaha

Top cited domain google.com Referenced by AI across the coworking spaces in omaha query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category

Visibility spread 88pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 19 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this category

Spaces dominates this category with a visibility score of 87.5%, against a category average of just 4.4%. That gap is stark: every other brand in the top 10 sits at 0.0% visibility. The composite score for Spaces is 61.2, while the next closest brand, Regus, scores only 15.0. With 18 of 20 brands essentially invisible in AI-generated responses, the category is effectively a one-brand conversation at the moment.

The Regus data reveals a meaningful split between visibility and citation. Regus holds 0.0% visibility yet earns a 50.0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode references it as a source without surfacing it as a named recommendation. Spaces shows the inverse pattern: 87.5% visibility but 0.0% citations. This divergence suggests AI is naming Spaces to users while borrowing authority from Regus-linked content behind the scenes, a distinction that matters for how each brand is actually influencing buyer decisions.

The cited sources list for this category is anchored heavily in local and aggregator content. Google.com leads, followed by coworkingcafe.com, omahaguide.com, and local operators like modernworksuites.com, avantspaces.com, and therootcoworking.com. Brand domains from the top 20 ranked coworking operators are largely absent from that citation list, which explains why composite scores are so low across the board. The AI is pulling location-specific directory and guide content rather than operator websites.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility fallers

Regus 50% → 0% · rank #2 → #2
-50pp
Spaces 100% → 88% · rank #1 → #1
-12pp

The ranking

#	Brand	Visibility	Citation	Top engine
1	Spaces spacesworks.com	88%	0%	Google AI Mode
Spaces leads with 87.5% visibility, more than 20 times the 4.4% category average, but its 0.0% citation rate means it earns no source credit from Google AI Mode.
2	Regus regus.com	0%	50%	Google AI Mode
Regus is the only brand besides Spaces with a non-zero composite score (15.0), driven entirely by a 50.0% citation rate despite recording 0.0% visibility this period.
3	WeWork wework.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
WeWork sits at rank 3 by brand recognition but records 0.0% across all three metrics, making it statistically indistinguishable from the 17 brands ranked below it.
4	Industrious industriousoffice.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
Industrious holds rank 4 yet scores 0.0% on visibility, citations, and composite, suggesting its national profile has not translated into any AI presence for Omaha-specific queries.
5	Venture X venturex.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
Venture X mirrors Industrious exactly with a composite score of 0.0, indicating neither brand is being surfaced or cited by Google AI Mode for coworking searches in Omaha.
6	Expansive expansive.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
7	Serendipity Labs serendipitylabs.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
8	Office Evolution officeevolution.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
9	Common Desk thecommondesk.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
10	Lucid Private Offices lucidoffices.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
11	Intelligent Office intelligentoffice.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
12	Premier Workspaces premierworkspaces.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
13	Pipeline pipelineworkspaces.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
14	Switchyards switchyards.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
15	Deskpass deskpass.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
16	Novel Coworking novelcoworking.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
17	Kiln kiln.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
18	Common House commonhouse.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
19	COhatch cohatch.com	0%	0%	Google AI Mode
20	The Malin themalin.co	0%	0%	Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on coworking spaces in omaha, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

google.comcoworkingcafe.commodernworksuites.comavantspaces.comomahaguide.comwezoo.comupnorthmedia.cotherootcoworking.com

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →

Get your own coworking spaces in omaha brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your coworking spaces in omaha brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about coworking spaces in omaha AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility in coworking spaces in Omaha?

Spaces leads with 87.5% visibility and a composite score of 61.2, far ahead of every other brand in the category. No other brand exceeds a composite score of 15.0.

What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for coworking research in Omaha?

The top cited sources are google.com, coworkingcafe.com, modernworksuites.com, avantspaces.com, omahaguide.com, and therootcoworking.com. These are primarily local guides and aggregators rather than the major coworking operator domains.

Why does Regus have citations but no visibility in this category?

Regus records a 50.0% citation rate but 0.0% visibility, meaning Google AI Mode is drawing on Regus-linked content as a source while not surfacing Regus as a named recommendation to users.

How concentrated is AI visibility across the 20 brands in this category?

Extremely concentrated: Spaces holds 87.5% visibility while 18 of 20 brands sit at 0.0%, and the category average visibility is only 4.4%.

Are any brands showing momentum in AI visibility for coworking in Omaha?

The data shows no visibility risers in this period. Both Spaces and Regus are listed as fallers, with Regus dropping 50.0 percentage points in visibility and Spaces dropping 12.5 percentage points from a previous high of 100.0%.

Do the top-ranked coworking brands own the citations Google AI Mode uses?

No. The citation sources include local operators like modernworksuites.com and therootcoworking.com alongside directory sites, while the domains of the top 20 ranked brands are largely absent from the cited sources list.