monitoraeo
AI Visibility Rankings · Business Services

Coworking spaces in Melbourne: AI search visibility ranking (2026)

How AI search engines rank coworking spaces in melbourne by visibility and citations. 16 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Coworking operators serving Melbourne startups, scaleups, agencies, and hybrid teams with desks, studios, offices, and community-driven workspaces. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

Refreshed Jun 09, 2026
5%
Avg visibility across category
8%
Avg citation rate
16/16
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

At a glance

Category leader The Commons 38% visibility · named in 3 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Regus 62% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in coworking spaces in melbourne
Top cited domain tagvenue.com Referenced by AI across the coworking spaces in melbourne query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 38pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 11 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this categoryauto-generated

The Commons leads the Melbourne coworking AI visibility landscape with a 37.5% visibility score — nearly seven times the category average of 5.5% and more than triple the next closest brand, Inspire9 at 12.5%. This gap is significant: The Commons entered the tracked period with zero prior visibility and gained all 37.5 points in a single measurement window, suggesting a sudden, sharp emergence in Google AI Mode's narrative about this category. No other brand comes close to matching this trajectory in the same period.

The most striking divergence in the data is Regus, which holds zero visibility (0.0%) yet leads all brands in citation rate at 62.5% — the highest citation figure in the entire dataset. This means Google AI Mode is actively pulling Regus as a source reference without naming it as a featured brand in responses. Conversely, The Commons is named frequently but never cited as a source. Inspire9 is the only top-5 brand achieving meaningful scores on both dimensions (12.5% visibility, 25.0% citation), making it the most balanced performer.

All ten tracked brands share Google AI Mode as their top engine, confirming this category's AI visibility is entirely concentrated within a single engine. The top cited sources list reveals the AI anchors heavily on third-party aggregators and directory sites — tagvenue.com, deskpass.com, instantoffices.com, and eibc.net.au all appear ahead of most brand domains. Only regus.com and inspire9.com appear in both the cited sources list and the brand rankings, indicating those two brands have successfully established their own domains as reference material within the AI's sourcing logic.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • The Commons 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1
    +38pp
  • Inspire9 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3
    +12pp
  • WeWork 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #4
    +12pp

The ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
thecommons.com.au
38% 0% Google AI Mode

The Commons holds 37.5% visibility — nearly 7x the 5.5% category average — but records 0.0% citations, meaning AI names it without treating its domain as a source.

2
regus.com
0% 62% Google AI Mode

Regus is the category's most-cited brand at 62.5% citation rate despite 0.0% visibility, appearing in AI source references without ever being named as a featured brand.

3
inspire9.com
12% 25% Google AI Mode

Inspire9 is the only top-5 brand with meaningful scores on both metrics — 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation — and its domain appears directly in the top cited sources list.

4
wework.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

WeWork sits at a balanced 12.5% on both visibility and citation, matching The Executive Centre exactly, but both scores remain well below Regus's citation dominance.

5
executivecentre.com
12% 12% Google AI Mode

The Executive Centre mirrors WeWork with identical 12.5% visibility and 12.5% citation scores, offering no differentiating signal in Google AI Mode for this category.

6
hubaustralia.com
12% 0% Google AI Mode
7
servcorp.com.au
0% 12% Google AI Mode
8
wotso.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
9
fishburners.org
0% 0% Google AI Mode
10
tankstreamlabs.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
11
christiespaces.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
spaceandco.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
theworkproject.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
ybf.vc
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
flexbyispt.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
thecluster.com.au
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on coworking spaces in melbourne, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

tagvenue.comgoogle.comregus.comdeskpass.comcreativecubes.coeibc.net.auinstantoffices.cominspire9.com

How to read this ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.

Rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.

Get your own coworking spaces in melbourne brand audited

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your coworking spaces in melbourne brand → Browse all rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about coworking spaces in melbourne AI visibility

Who leads AI visibility in Melbourne coworking spaces?

The Commons leads with 37.5% visibility in Google AI Mode, a score that emerged from zero in the prior period and sits nearly seven times above the 5.5% category average.

Which brand is most cited by AI when researching Melbourne coworking?

Regus is the most cited brand at 62.5%, despite recording 0.0% visibility — meaning AI uses it as a source reference but does not feature it as a named recommendation.

What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for Melbourne coworking research?

The AI relies heavily on third-party aggregators including tagvenue.com, deskpass.com, and instantoffices.com, with only regus.com and inspire9.com appearing as both brand domains and cited sources.

Is there a brand that performs well on both visibility and citation in this category?

Inspire9 is the only top-5 brand with meaningful scores on both dimensions, recording 12.5% visibility and 25.0% citation, and its domain appears in the top cited sources list.

How fragmented is AI visibility across the 16 tracked brands in this category?

Visibility is highly concentrated — The Commons alone accounts for 37.5% while six of the ten ranked brands record 0.0% visibility, and the category average is just 5.5%.

Which brands are new entrants to AI visibility in this category?

The Commons, Inspire9, and WeWork are all identified as biggest visibility risers, each moving from 0.0% previous visibility to their current scores within the latest measurement window.