monitoraeo
AEO Rankings · Productivity

AEO for conference room booking software: AI search visibility ranking

How AI search engines rank conference room booking software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Conference room booking software used to reserve meeting spaces, manage hybrid offices, coordinate visitors, and improve workplace utilization. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →

11%
Avg visibility across category
16%
Avg citation rate
20/20
Brands successfully audited
X LinkedIn

When buyers ask AI engines about conference room booking software, Joan is the brand most frequently mentioned. Joan leads the pack with a commanding 50% visibility rate. Skedda and Robin are also commonly cited as top competitors. Joan's frequent citation suggests it is a reliable choice in this category.

The rankings reflect data from major sources like getjoan.com and hybridhero.com, along with influential community sites like reddit.com. These sites are often aggregators or review platforms, which collect user experiences and expert insights. As a result, they have a significant influence on how AI engines rank different software solutions.

For buyers, choosing from this list means paying attention to recent reviews and third-party validation. AI engines emphasize these factors heavily, requiring brands to maintain a strong authority in the conference room booking subcategory. Consider how well a brand is perceived for both its innovative features and user satisfaction.

At a glance

Category leader Skedda 62% visibility · named in 5 of 8 AI answers
Most cited brand Joan 75% citation rate · the AI's most-trusted source brand in conference room booking software
Top cited domain getjoan.com Referenced by AI across the conference room booking software query set — the highest-leverage PR target in this category
Visibility spread 62pp Gap between top and bottom of the ranking · 15 brands at 0% (invisible to the AI)

What we observed in this category

Joan leads the category with a composite score of 57.5, edging out Skedda (55.0) and Robin (43.8) despite having lower raw visibility than both. The gap matters because Joan's citation rate of 75.0% is dramatically higher than the category average of 15.6%, meaning the AI not only mentions Joan but actively references it as a source. Skedda and Robin both sit at 62.5% visibility yet diverge sharply on citation, which signals that visibility alone does not translate into AI trust.

The visibility-to-citation divergence is most striking at rank 5, where Archie records 0.0% visibility but a 62.5% citation rate, placing it well above the 15.6% average on citation while being completely absent from unprompted AI mentions. Robin shows the inverse pattern, appearing in 62.5% of responses yet earning zero citations. Tactic mirrors Archie with 0.0% visibility and 37.5% citations. This split suggests the AI distinguishes between brands it names in recommendations and domains it pulls as reference material.

Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in the dataset, confirming this category's AI visibility is concentrated on a single surface. The top cited sources list includes getjoan.com, archieapp.co, reddit.com, hybridhero.com, and awaio.com, indicating the AI anchors on a mix of vendor-owned domains and third-party review or community content. Reddit's presence alongside niche sites like hybridhero.com and guideflow.com suggests the AI draws on practitioner-level community discussions rather than purely editorial review sites.

Movers & shakers since last refresh

Biggest visibility risers

  • Skedda 0% → 62% · rank #4 → #2
    +62pp
  • Joan 0% → 50% · rank #2 → #1
    +50pp
  • Robin 12% → 62% · rank #3 → #3
    +50pp

Biggest visibility fallers

  • Archie 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #5
    -12pp

The AEO ranking

# Brand Visibility Citation Top engine
1
getjoan.com
50% 75% Google AI Mode

Joan holds the top composite score of 57.5 and a 75.0% citation rate, nearly five times the 15.6% category average, making it the most trusted source in AI responses.

2
skedda.com
62% 38% Google AI Mode

Skedda matches Robin on visibility at 62.5% but its 37.5% citation rate puts it well above Robin's 0.0%, giving it a stronger composite score of 55.0 versus 43.8.

3
robinpowered.com
62% 0% Google AI Mode

Robin ties Skedda on visibility at 62.5% yet receives zero citations, a gap that suppresses its composite score to 43.8 and signals low AI source authority despite broad mention frequency.

4
envoy.com
25% 25% Google AI Mode

Envoy Rooms sits at a composite score of 25.0 with both visibility and citation at 25.0%, placing it well below the top three but showing balanced presence without the citation-visibility split seen in peers.

5
archieapp.co
0% 62% Google AI Mode

Archie records 0.0% visibility yet a 62.5% citation rate, four times the category average, indicating the AI uses its domain as a reference source without proactively naming it in recommendations.

6
yarooms.com
12% 25% Google AI Mode
7
gettactic.com
0% 38% Google AI Mode
8
microsoft.com
0% 25% Google AI Mode
9
appspace.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
10
nexudus.com
0% 12% Google AI Mode
11
condecosoftware.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
12
officespacesoftware.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
13
gobright.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
14
eptura.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
15
roomzilla.net
0% 0% Google AI Mode
16
meetingroomapp.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
17
iofficecorp.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
18
mapiq.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
19
teem.com
0% 0% Google AI Mode
20
zoom.us
0% 0% Google AI Mode

Sources AI engines trust in this category

Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on conference room booking software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.

getjoan.comhybridhero.comreddit.comarchieapp.cogoogle.comawaio.comguideflow.comyoutube.com

How to read this AEO ranking

Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.

Visibility = being named

A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →

Citation rate = being trusted

Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →

Top engine differs by brand

The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →

AEO rankings move month to month

AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →

Run an AEO audit on your own conference room booking software brand

The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.

Audit your conference room booking software brand → Browse all AEO rankings Methodology →

Frequently asked about AEO for conference room booking software

Who leads AI visibility in conference room booking software?

Joan leads with a composite score of 57.5, driven primarily by a 75.0% citation rate that is nearly five times the 15.6% category average. Skedda ranks second at 55.0 composite, with higher raw visibility but lower citation authority.

Which brands are most cited as sources in AI responses for this category?

The top cited domains are getjoan.com and archieapp.co among vendor sites, alongside third-party sources including hybridhero.com, reddit.com, awaio.com, and guideflow.com. This mix shows the AI pulls from both vendor content and community or niche review content.

Can a brand be cited frequently without appearing in AI recommendations?

Yes. Archie has a 0.0% visibility rate but a 62.5% citation rate, and Tactic shows the same pattern with 0.0% visibility and 37.5% citations. Both brands are used as background references without being named in direct recommendations.

Which engine dominates AI visibility for conference room booking software?

Google AI Mode is the top-performing engine for every single brand in the dataset, meaning this category's AI answer landscape is almost entirely concentrated on one surface.

Which brands have seen the biggest recent visibility gains?

Skedda and Joan both moved from 0.0% to their current visibility levels, a delta of 62.5 and 50.0 percentage points respectively, making them the sharpest risers in the audit period. Robin also gained 50.0 visibility points despite holding the same rank.

What does a high visibility but zero citation score indicate for a brand?

Robin's profile, with 62.5% visibility and 0.0% citations, suggests the AI mentions the brand in response lists but does not anchor on its domain as a trustworthy reference source. This limits its composite score to 43.8 compared to Joan's 57.5.