Commercial real estate brokers: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank commercial real estate brokers by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Commercial real estate brokers advising landlords, occupiers, and investors on leasing, sales, tenant representation, capital markets, and property strategy. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 30, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity answer questions about commercial real estate brokers, Marcus & Millichap comes up most consistently, appearing as a cited source in 37.5% of relevant AI responses across the engines tracked here. CBRE and JLL round out the top three, appearing regularly alongside Marcus & Millichap when buyers ask for broker recommendations in this category.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines trust most. The top cited domains include clutch.co and m.yelp.com (third-party review aggregators), marcusmillichap.com (the leader's own site), reddit.com (peer discussion threads), and sharplaunch.com (a commercial real estate marketing resource). When aggregator and review sites dominate citations, it means AI engines are weighting external validation and user-generated content heavily in how they score credibility.
For a buyer using this page, the practical takeaway is to cross-check any shortlisted broker against the sources AI engines actually pull from. A broker with strong recent reviews on clutch.co or Yelp, active presence in Reddit discussions, and clear topical authority in your specific property type (multifamily, industrial, retail) will surface more consistently in AI recommendations, which is a reasonable proxy for broad third-party validation.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Marcus & Millichap holds the top composite score at 11.2, ahead of CBRE, JLL, Cushman & Wakefield, and Transwestern which all sit at 8.8. The gap matters because Marcus & Millichap achieves this rank with zero visibility (0.0%) but a 37.5% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode references its domain as a source without surfacing it in brand mentions. The four brands at 8.8 show the inverse pattern, appearing in AI responses but never being cited as a source.
The divergence between visibility and citation is the defining feature of this category. Marcus & Millichap is cited 37.5% of the time but has 0.0% visibility, while CBRE, JLL, Cushman & Wakefield, and Transwestern each register 12.5% visibility with 0.0% citation. NAI Global and Lee & Associates mirror the Marcus & Millichap pattern at a smaller scale, holding 12.5% citation each with zero visibility. No single brand achieves meaningful scores on both dimensions simultaneously.
The cited sources list anchors heavily on third-party and review platforms rather than the major broker domains. Clutch.co, m.yelp.com, reddit.com, and propertyradar.com appear alongside marcusmillichap.com, sharplaunch.com, bergercommercial.com, and reonomy.com. The presence of clutch.co and yelp in a commercial real estate context suggests Google AI Mode is pulling from general business-directory signals rather than industry-specific authoritative publishers. The category average visibility of 2.5% and citation average of 3.1% confirm how thin overall AI presence is across all 20 brands.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
CBRE 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
-
JLL 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3+12pp
-
Cushman & Wakefield 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #4+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
marcusmillichap.com
|
0% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Marcus & Millichap leads with a composite score of 11.2 and a 37.5% citation rate, the highest in the category, despite recording zero visibility across all queries. |
||||
| 2 |
cbre.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
CBRE scores 8.8 composite with 12.5% visibility (five times the 2.5% category average) but has a 0.0% citation rate, the opposite profile to the rank-1 brand. |
||||
| 3 |
jll.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
JLL matches CBRE exactly at 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation, and is one of three brands that entered the ranked list this period from a previous rank of zero. |
||||
| 4 |
cushmanwakefield.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cushman & Wakefield holds an 8.8 composite score identical to CBRE and JLL, with the same 12.5% visibility and zero citation, offering no differentiation from those two peers in AI responses. |
||||
| 5 |
transwestern.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Transwestern sits at 8.8 composite and 12.5% visibility, matching ranks 2-4, but unlike those three brands it is not listed as a visibility riser, suggesting its current score is not a new gain. |
||||
| 6 |
naiglobal.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
lee-associates.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
colliers.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
ngkf.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
savills.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
knightfrank.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
avisonyoung.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
berkadia.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
cresa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
eastdilsecured.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
jll.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
kidder.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
streamrealty.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
carterjonas.co.uk
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
northmarq.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on commercial real estate brokers, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own commercial real estate brokers brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about commercial real estate brokers AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in commercial real estate brokers?
Marcus & Millichap leads with the highest composite score of 11.2, driven entirely by a 37.5% citation rate rather than visibility. CBRE, JLL, Cushman & Wakefield, and Transwestern follow at 8.8, led by visibility rather than citation.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for commercial real estate broker research?
The top cited sources include clutch.co, m.yelp.com, reddit.com, and propertyradar.com alongside marcusmillichap.com, indicating AI Mode leans on third-party directories and review platforms rather than major broker websites.
Can a brand have high citation but zero visibility in this category?
Yes. Marcus & Millichap has a 37.5% citation rate and 0.0% visibility, and both NAI Global and Lee & Associates show 12.5% citation with 0.0% visibility, confirming citation and visibility measure distinct AI behaviours.
Which brands are new entrants to AI visibility in this category?
CBRE, JLL, and Cushman & Wakefield all moved from a previous rank of zero to their current positions, each gaining 12.5 percentage points of visibility in the most recent period.
How does the category average compare to the top performers?
The category average visibility is 2.5% and average citation is 3.1%, meaning Marcus & Millichap's 37.5% citation rate is roughly twelve times the category average, and the top four visible brands are each five times the average.
Are any major brokers completely absent from AI Mode responses?
Colliers, Newmark, and Savills all score 0.0% on both visibility and citation, giving them a composite score of 0.0 and no measurable presence in Google AI Mode responses in this audit period.