AEO for commercial real estate brokerages: AI search visibility ranking
How AI search engines rank commercial real estate brokerages by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured quarterly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Commercial real estate brokerages that advise on office, industrial, retail, multifamily, capital markets, tenant representation, and investment sales transactions. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this AEO ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers inquire about Commercial real estate brokerages, AI engines frequently recommend JLL as the leading brand, achieving a 62.5% visibility in answers. Other notable mentions include CBRE and Cushman & Wakefield. JLL's considerable presence underscores its prominence in the industry.
The rankings are shaped significantly by citations from popular domains such as reddit.com and youtube.com, as well as industry-specific sites like sharplaunch.com. This suggests that user-generated content and expert reviews heavily influence AI-based rankings, spotlighting platforms that aggregate and disseminate information.
For buyers, these insights highlight the importance of selecting a brokerage recognized by AI for recent and relevant reviews, third-party validation, and authority in specific niches. Consider brands that consistently appear in AI recommendations, as they likely provide trusted, validated, and timely services.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
JLL and CBRE share the top position in this category, each recording 62.5% visibility and a composite score of 43.8, well above the category average of 10.0%. Cushman and Wakefield sits third at 50.0% visibility, meaning the top three brands collectively dominate AI-generated answers in a way that leaves little room for rivals. The gap between rank three and rank four is stark: Colliers holds just 25.0% visibility, and every brand from rank five downward records zero visibility, making the leadership cluster unusually concentrated for a 20-brand field.
A notable divergence between visibility and citation runs through this data. JLL, CBRE, and Cushman and Wakefield are named frequently in AI answers but carry 0.0% citation rates, meaning Google AI Mode references them without linking back to their owned domains. SVN and Lee and Associates show the inverse pattern: zero visibility but 12.5% citation each, so their content is being sourced as a reference even though the brand names are not surfacing in answers. This split suggests that being named and being trusted as a source are separate AEO outcomes in this category.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, confirming that AEO performance here is almost entirely shaped by a single platform. The cited sources Google AI Mode anchors on are predominantly third-party, including reddit.com, youtube.com, commercialsearch.com, and clutch.co, none of which are owned by the major brokerages. Sharplaunch.com and hughesmarino.com also appear as cited sources, indicating that niche advisory and tenant-rep sites carry disproportionate citation weight relative to the large national brands.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
JLL 25% → 62% · rank #4 → #1+38pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Colliers 50% → 25% · rank #3 → #4-25pp
-
Newmark 12% → 0% · rank #5 → #20-12pp
The AEO ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
jll.com
|
62% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
JLL leads the category at 62.5% visibility after rising from rank four, a 37.5 point visibility gain, yet still records 0.0% citation, meaning AI names but never links to jll.com. |
||||
| 2 |
cbre.com
|
62% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
CBRE matches JLL exactly at 62.5% visibility and a 43.8 composite score, but also holds 0.0% citation, placing it level on AEO presence while its domain earns no source credit. |
||||
| 3 |
cushmanwakefield.com
|
50% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cushman and Wakefield sits 12.5 points below the joint leaders at 50.0% visibility and a 35.0 composite score, with a 0.0% citation rate identical to the brands above it. |
||||
| 4 |
colliers.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Colliers has dropped from rank three, losing 25.0 visibility points to land at 25.0%, less than half the category leaders, after recording the sharpest percentage fall among all tracked brands. |
||||
| 5 |
svn.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
SVN records zero visibility but a 12.5% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the entire top ten, showing its content is referenced by AI without the brand appearing in answers. |
||||
| 6 |
lee-associates.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
cresa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
streamrealty.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
walkerdunlop.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
northmarq.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
theshoppingcentergroup.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
eastdilsecured.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
transwestern.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
berkadia.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
marcusmillichap.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
kidder.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
naiglobal.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
savills.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
avisonyoung.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
nmrk.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on commercial real estate brokerages, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this AEO ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
AEO rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 90 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Run an AEO audit on your own commercial real estate brokerages brand
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same answer engine optimisation measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about AEO for commercial real estate brokerages
Who leads AEO in commercial real estate brokerages?
JLL and CBRE share the top position, each at 62.5% visibility and a composite score of 43.8, significantly ahead of the category average of 10.0%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for commercial real estate brokerages research?
The top cited sources are reddit.com, youtube.com, sharplaunch.com, hughesmarino.com, commercialsearch.com, and clutch.co, none of which are owned by the major national brokerages.
Which brands are cited by AI but not named in answers?
SVN and Lee and Associates both record 0.0% visibility alongside 12.5% citation, meaning their content is used as a source even though their brand names do not appear in AI-generated responses.
How concentrated is AEO performance in this category?
The top three brands (JLL, CBRE, Cushman and Wakefield) hold all meaningful visibility, while 14 of the 20 tracked brands record both 0.0% visibility and 0.0% citation.
Which brand has seen the biggest recent AEO movement?
JLL rose from rank four to rank one with a 37.5 point visibility gain, while Newmark fell from rank five to rank 20, dropping 12.5 visibility points to reach 0.0%.
Does high brand visibility guarantee citation in this category?
No. JLL, CBRE, and Cushman and Wakefield all carry 0.0% citation despite leading on visibility, confirming that Google AI Mode names these brands without linking to their owned domains.